this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2026
106 points (97.3% liked)

politics

31474 readers
2382 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 43 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I so want to see a trial of any high-level Nat-C's like that douchebag Hegseth.

Talk about someone that peaked in high school....

[–] Heikki2@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago

How great would it be a mass drowning in the reflecting pool like a giant unlisted swirly

[–] Hayduke@lemmy.world 29 points 5 days ago

Not because it’s wrong, but because the threshold of unpopularity was crossed.

[–] Fishnoodle@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The key takeaway is that he's a fucking limp dick jagoff who wanted to look tough, but he was so fucking stupid he didn't realize the prisoner was in a fucking wheel chair before spouting his dipshit plan for a public execution.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Hegseth or donnie?

I figure Hegseth announced this and thought it was going to really ~~make him look so goddamned cool~~ project a "warrior ethos" that gets the Nat-C's hard.

I'm not sure he had the time to look into things - he's been spending an absurd amount of time involved in taxpayer-paid influencer videos of him in ridiculously stupid exercise scenarios with the troops. The only thing dumber is when he has RFK jr working out with him in jeans and no shirt.

[–] Fetus@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Nothing he does will ever make him look like a warrior after his little "oopsie daisy!" move after missing an axe target and hitting someone.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMrVdFnjEjs

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Oh that's hilarious, never saw the skateboard one. That must have been one stupid morning show segment - dudes in suits given sneakers and skateboards?

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 12 points 5 days ago

There is 1 real takeaway, they wanted to do it to set a precedent, didn't get the support, so backed off, for now.

Not much more to say, other than the fact that Hegseth is on his way out soon-ish. I'd say the new press secretary is not long for this government either but that's another story.

[–] Radical_Socialist_t00t@lemmy.ca 20 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Only reason is the guy was in a wheelchair and it was gonna look bad, nothing else.

If that guy wasn't in a wheelchair it'd still be happening

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm surprised he cares about it looking bad

[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He cares about it impacting midterms

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That implies he isn't going to steal the midterms or ignore the results

[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Unfortunately he will try both of those

[–] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Well they could have just tied him to a pole or something

[–] Widdershins@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

And have the Pole get shot and start a war with Poland?

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Why does the line from the "Hunchback of Notre Dame" come to mind: Who is the monster and who is the man?