this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2026
159 points (98.8% liked)

politics

31880 readers
2617 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Top Trump Administration officials have taken to the campaign trail to boost Republican candidates ahead of the pivotal midterm elections as the party battles to retain control of Congress.

Last month alone, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendan Carr, and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum appeared alongside President Donald Trump to support Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan in his tight reelection fight against Democrat Mary Peltola at a rally in Wasilla, Alaska, on Oct. 13. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth appeared in Wisconsin alongside GOP Rep. Derrick Van Orden on Oct. 20 to speak to manufacturing workers during a Pentagon tour highlighting U.S. defense production. Last Monday, Vice President JD Vance and Burgum spoke at a rally in Topeka, Kansas. And on Tuesday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio briefly joined Trump on stage, at the President’s urging, during a rally in Corpus Christi, Texas.

Cabinet members and other leading Trump officials have been wading into the midterms in these and other ways for months. In August, for instance, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy endorsed Republican Senate candidate Mike Rogers in Michigan.

Legal experts and advocacy groups contend that in making such moves, members of the Administration have violated a decades-old law: the Hatch Act, passed by Congress in 1939, which places restrictions on certain political activities for federal executive branch employees.

...

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] the_q@piefed.social 43 points 1 week ago

Without consequences rules and laws have no meaning.

[–] Denfa@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago

When someone is willing to rape and brutalize children, or help cover up for the people who serially commit crimes against children—are there any moral boundaries or limits on what their conscience will allow them to do? Are there any lines in their life that should never be crossed? These are the questions I contemplate whenever people seem to be surprised that constitutional guidelines and traditions of civil engagement are steamrolled yet again by the Trump administration.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago

As with almost all other headlines ending in a question mark, the answer is "No."

But, our other branches of government who are supposed to provide checks and balances are complicit.

[–] JustPlainDave@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago

I think the better question is "would it matter if they weren't allowed?". Because it doesn't seem to.

[–] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago

Are they allowed to? Were they actually doing anything else aside from pocketing our tax dollars and finding new, cruel ways to harm people?

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

Are they allowed to?

Who's gonna stop them?

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago

If the best the regime can muster is send Doug Burgum and Brendon Carr on the campaign trail, they must be desperate. It's hard to find Trump henchmen who are more inconsequential and devoid of charisma.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

The Hatch Act comes up in popular media fairly regularly too. Parks and Recreation had at least one episode on it.

[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

Hatch act is dead and buried

[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The demographic most likely to be swayed by Lutnick's appearance:

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You leave Healslimes out of this.

[–] Blibly@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

2016 ass headline