this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
452 points (97.3% liked)

News

30737 readers
4462 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 113 points 1 year ago (2 children)

the company is still worth over $6 billion on paper

But is it, though? 🥴

[–] neptune@dmv.social 52 points 1 year ago

"on paper". You only add this in when everyone knows it's not actually true, but someone wrote it was.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I imagine that refers to market cap

[–] theodewere@kbin.social 55 points 1 year ago (5 children)

its market cap is entirely fraudulent.. not only did the company lose money last year, it only brought in $4 million in revenues.. this wild IPO valuation is indicative of fraud of some kind.. probably plain old money laundering..

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 year ago

Yep. Not that Reddit is worth as much as it opened for, but it's worth more than Truth Social for sure, but somehow they opened to a higher value at about the same time. There's no reasonable way that happened legitimately.

[–] havocpants@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

this wild IPO valuation is indicative of fraud of some kind… probably plain old money laundering…

It wasn't an IPO - it's doubtful they would have fulfilled the regulatory requirements for an IPO.

DJT is a SPAC.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special-purpose_acquisition_company

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

plain old money laundering

Yes, yes and yes.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

A market cap can’t really be “fraudulent”. Stock valuation has traditional methods, but meme stocks have blown the lid off of that in many circumstances. It’s still worth that much because people are willing to pay that price.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Either that or it's written on some very expensive paper. Not sure what material would be worth that much at A4 and 8.5x11 sizes.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Cool, so he's worth what, -$2 billion?

[–] FrostyTrichs@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think you need to double check your math. -2,000,000,000 < 0

Worthless than zero

Yet he couldn’t afford his bond money.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 50 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This article is out of date. It fell by a lot more than that by close of the market.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I love stories with happy endings.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's still worth billions, and more than it was initially offered at.

Until it drops to $2 and/or is delisted, it's not a happy or even amusing ending.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 year ago

Market Cap = $6.069 B (because the screenshot cut it off)

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

Correction: Trump's stated net worth now more closely aligns with his actual worth ($0)

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

First World Jerk problems.

[–] june@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I almost bought puts.

Realized I lack the knowledge.

So I chose not to.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you bought puts at the wrong time, you would have lost money, and then you would be doubly upset when it actually cratered.

1 sad is better than 2 sad + poor.

Smarter than most even if that ends up the right call in hindsight.

The market can remain irrational, etc

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'll bet puts were really, really expensive.

[–] june@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yea I have no idea how they work so probably. 😅

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'll sell you the opportunity to take my share right now and sell it, if you promise to buy me another share in 3 months at the going rate then. If I guess right, that share will cost as much as it does right now, so when I get my share back, it's still worth what it was before and I keep the fee you paid to borrow my share. If you guessed right, you can replace that share at a much lower cost in 3 months.

The cost I'm going to ask to lend you my share will go up as the likelihood of the price going down later on increases. If it's really, really likely that the cost will go down, I'm going to charge your ass off to borrow my share to offset the potential loss I'm going to take.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

God damn the stock market is just pure unadulterated gambling

[–] Dashi@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago
[–] june@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

This is why I don’t play in options, I can never keep them straight. I apparently meant I considered shorting the stock.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] frunch@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pump n trump

Or would it be trump and dump?

[–] Gabu@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Dumb and dump

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

The ‘ol Trump Pump Dump

[–] recapitated@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

It's still up way over its fake IPO

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

They made up that worth a couple of days ago. To be honest, it needs to drop another $5B.

[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I wonder if he'll try to grab his stocks in the groin when they're trading on the pink sheets.

[–] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago
[–] LaterRedditor@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let's see how long MAGA can hold

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Diamond hands! Or some dumb shit.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Can't lose what you never had.