Statalyzer

This is literally humanity.

Yes but the ratio of the two is different in some places than others.

Remember in college basketball when a coach got a tech for having a heart attack?

True but he only covered Jokic for like a quarter of the game and Jokic is really really good - players who are that good usually get theirs one way or the other unless they just have an awful game.

And this is why the league was way too soft giving him just 5 games rather than the 20 or so it deserved. Why would he regret it? He got a slap on the wrist relative to the action.

I wonder if he's deluded enough that he genuinely believes that he was simply fairly defending a teammate - said teammate was in a fight and Gobert was trying to break up the fight. He wasn't threatening to harm Klay or anything. But if Draymond were really trying to just protect Klay, he would have gone after McDaniels - the one who was actually fighting with Klay Thompson.

Moat people seem to think all announcers suck and just want to complain regardless.

Looks like the all-star game.

Guys was trying to break up a fight. How is helping a fight to NOT get stopped "protecting" anyone?

I wonder if it's just because it feels like SNF has been the Giants and Jets all season long...

What people are really talking about when looking at that stat is how often can an offense keep the drive alive for another set of downs.

I don't think that's accurate - if that's the case, we / you would be combining it with 1st and 2nd down conversions as well.

Now "3rd + 4th rate" does tell us something useful, but I don't see a big problem with separating them either.

A lot of Irish and Scottish dances can get pretty damn strenuous.

A combined 7/8 on 4th down. Where are all the "analytics have ruined the game" complaints?

Also, I wonder how many "What a fucking idiot that coach/oc is" posts there would have been had players whiffed blocks, dropped passes, etc, on the exact same calls...

Drop didn't matter, that play call had no chance anyway.