mjsaber

joined 1 year ago
[–] mjsaber@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

To my knowledge, proteins can start to denature at 104F, depending on the protein and other factors like pH. Around 106F, proteins in the brain will start to denature, regardless of other factors.

[–] mjsaber@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Also, at a high enough level (104 F), the proteins in your brain start to denature, which leads to death.

[–] mjsaber@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 months ago

I don't really have any advice or anything, but I hope you can find some reason to keep going. It sucks feeling alone, even more so when you're with other people.

Transitioning fucking sucks. Even if you have good results, it's a mess to deal with, physically and socially, and those difficulties make it mentally taxing as well. Like a lot of social media, we tend to only see the really exceptional cases, and not the reality a lot of us will live with.

I wish I had something to say that could take your pain away, but I don't. At some point, we all have to find a reason to keep going for ourselves. For me, it's my cat. It's nothing, in the grand scheme of things, but I'm all he has, and that's enough to keep me going. At least for today.

Keep reaching out. Keep trying. In the end, that's all we can really do.

[–] mjsaber@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The Amazon series is fan fiction. This is part of the background story Tolkien wrote.

I'm not really interested in either, as they are both soulless capitalist cash grabs, but I think this has the possibility of being a decent (although completely unnecessary) film .

[–] mjsaber@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Lol me neither

[–] mjsaber@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 9 months ago (3 children)

It's not as punk, but the last three albums by Metric are brilliant in how they discuss the current state of the world.

[–] mjsaber@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 months ago

I don't use Linux, but I love penguins, and I want to chill with this Lil guy

[–] mjsaber@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

As long as they aren't getting medical advice from you, I'm good with it.

[–] mjsaber@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 11 months ago (3 children)

No, like my initial comment said, number and types of partners are important, as are your partners' partners.

If you actually read my comment, you can see I'm trying to get people to look past the stigma and actually determine what kinds of risks they have and make safer sex decisions accordingly.

PrEP can have some uncomfortable side effects, and not everyone is able to tolerate it. There are very, very few things in healthcare that we can say "everyone" in a certain cohort should do, and PrEP is no exception.

Your response, which characterizes my post as misinformation, is inaccurate, as I have shown, but I do appreciate the chance to talk about sex and try to normalize it as part of the healthcare discussion 😊

[–] mjsaber@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 months ago (5 children)

I literally posted a link to an article from Stanford that shows what I'm talking about.

[–] mjsaber@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (7 children)

I'm not anti gay, I was an STI nurse for a few years. Anal sex for ANYONE carries a higher risk per interaction, regardless of whether you are the receptive or insetive partner.

My point was not to label all people having unprotected sex as needing PrEP, or only gay people as needing PrEP. My point was to look at the types of sex you have, with the number and types of partners you have, and take a realistic look at what kinds of risks for STI transmission any of those have.

For instance, if you have lots of unprotected oral sex with strangers, you aren't going to get HIV. You might get another STI, but HIV is virtually un-transmissable via oral sex. But someone reading the comment might get scared and think they need to take PrEP.

https://stanfordhealthcare.org/medical-conditions/sexual-and-reproductive-health/hiv-aids/causes/risk-of-exposure.html#:~:text=Therefore%2C%20unprotected%20sex%20with%20an,exposures)%20for%20receptive%20anal%20sex.

[–] mjsaber@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 11 months ago (13 children)

That's not entirely true. Receptive vaginal sex is much less likely to transmit the virus than anal sex (about 17x less). Insertive anal sex is more likely to transmit than vaginal sex, too, so the type of sex you have matters too.

Number of partners, and their sexual habits really matter, too. It's important to help people really understand their STI risk if we want people to make healthier decisions regarding sex.

view more: ‹ prev next ›