this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Photography

24 readers
1 users here now

A place to politely discuss the tools, technique and culture of photography.

This is not a good place to simply share cool photos/videos or promote your own work and projects, but rather a place to discuss photography as an art and post things that would be of interest to other photographers.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
communick@viewfinder.pro
1
What’s your forever lens? (alien.top)
submitted 11 months ago by barberheart@alien.top to c/photography@viewfinder.pro
357 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

If you could only use one lens for the rest of time what would it be?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eroticfoxxxy@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I know it'a not everyone's favourite but I'd choose the 24-105

[–] Glen_Myers@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (4 children)

This is what I tell people. I would take the reach of f4 over the speed of a 2.8 most of the time.

[–] eroticfoxxxy@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

It can do great portraits if you know how to stage people against backgrounds to force bokeh. It'll never be as creamy, but honestly if you're shooting portraits lower than 3.2 you can miss so many shots due to focus.

If I had to choose ONE lens, this would be it.

[–] kermityfrog2@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

I've been using the Tamron 28-200mm 2.8-5.6 and it's a great all-rounder/vacation lens. This from also owning a 24-70 and 70-200 2.8 lenses.

[–] gbrldz@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (3 children)
[–] markyymark13@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That thing is the size of 70-200

[–] Snorlax46@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

And triple the cost. I'd rather have 3 $1000 lenses but that is the best answer to the question I've seen.

[–] Illustrious-Cherry12@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

So expensive. And so big. I'll stick with the Canon EF 24-105II f4..

[–] TestFlightBeta@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

When on earth did this come out?

[–] qtx@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I mean, Tamron has the 17-70mm APSC 2.8 which is 24-105 on FF.

[–] MuLLetDaDDie@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

I just got the 90mm sp af f/2.8

[–] Flojani@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm so envious that Canon made a 24-105mm f/2.8. I don't care that it's $3,000 or heavy. I just wish Nikon would make one for their cameras now. Lol.

[–] eroticfoxxxy@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Only as an RF though. I'm not buying a new system just for 1.2f difference

[–] cantwejustplaynice@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

That lens is my workhorse. Although for me it's paired with a .64x speed booster to use for video and it becomes a 30-135mm f/2.6 which is AMAZING.