this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
524 points (98.7% liked)

News

24599 readers
3997 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump’s move to defund USAID is causing unintended consequences for American farmers and businesses.

The Washington Post reports that USAID purchases billions in U.S. agricultural products, with American farms supplying 41% of its food aid.

The funding freeze has already halted $340 million in food shipments, leaving tons of wheat stranded in Houston.

Experts warn this decision directly harms American jobs and businesses, as much of USAID’s aid is administered through U.S.-based organizations employing American workers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SarcasticMan@lemmy.world 181 points 1 day ago (8 children)

They write these stories like this isn't the result he is looking for. The point is to crash, not rebuild; nothing the Trump administration is doing is geared to help, rebuild, or make America great. That's not how they make money. The more I see, the more I hear the more I am convinced the whole point is to destabilize and rebuild to get rid of that pesky constitution.

Maybe I am just angry or doomsaying, but I'll be damned if it doesn't look that way, and to make matters even worse, people just can't wrap their heads around the whole organized minority rules over the unorganized majority thing.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 98 points 1 day ago (3 children)

They write these stories like this isn’t the result he is looking for. The point is to crash, not rebuild;

I'm noticing a slightly different pattern with these actions. I don't think trump and his cronies were actually seeking to hurt farmers, but something else.

  1. hurt everyone temporary to see who screams.
  2. Those that scream that are opponents, continue to deny them the government benefit
  3. Those that are allies, extract concessions and/or pledges of fealty before returning the same benefit they had before.
  4. For those that don't scream, or don't scream loud enough, simply pocket the benefit for himself and his own goals.

nothing the Trump administration is doing is geared to help, rebuild, or make America great.

Agreed.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Basically pull all the cables and see what breaks that you care about.

Then just fix that.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Basically pull all the cables and see what breaks that you care about.

Then just fix that.

Yes. In IT we call this the "scream test". This feels like that with added corruption.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Incidentally, Musk did exactly that at Twitter. He blamed the developers for his own recklessness ("I was told we had redundancy across our data centers. What I wasn’t told was that we had 70,000 hard-coded references to Sacramento. And there’s still shit that’s broken because of it") when the infrastructure team strongly warned him ahead of time that this needed to be done carefully to avoid issues.

Which indicates that he learned nothing. Now he's doing the same to the federal government.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

What Musk didn't isn't what is acceptable as a "scream test" in IT. "Scream test" is only use after exhausting all other avenues of identifying any live processes still in use. Additionally, its broadcast weeks or months in advance so folks can be on the lookout for a process of theirs that is failing they didn't know was on the servers in question. Further, the "scream test" is just powering down the server, or possibly disconnecting it from the network. Either task can be un-done quickly to restore service in the event a live process is found that needs to be preserved.

Musk just ripped shit out in the middle of the night with no easy way to restore service. What he did was like ripping out your own organs to see if you die from it? Appendix? Apparently not needed. Liver? Why am I dead now?

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 28 points 1 day ago

Demarcating between enemies and allies (coerced or otherwise) is most definitely a primary goal.

[–] LedgeDrop@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Thank you for sharing your perspective.

I thought as the OP did (Trumps goal was to overwhelm and destabilize the U.S.)... your response gave me pause.

I guess we'll find out who was right in 4 years....

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And on the way down, connected rich people have already shorted select industries' stocks, then will buy in bigtime after the crash to profit on the long way back up.

The rich get richer.

EDIT: the way back up won't be so long, as theh recovery will be aided by big bailouts (or bail-ins) at the taxpayers' expense. So we'll get screwed not one, not two, but THREE ways.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago

That's basically what all the instability of the early 20th century was all about. On one end of the spectrum, you had communists and socialist looking at the old order and then reacting by destroying it all. On the other end of the political spectrum, you had the far right movements of the Nazis in Germany who saw the writing on the wall with the socialist wave moving in and instead wanted to create a counter movement to all the socially minded. The wealthy capitalists, millionaires, monarchs and historic aristocracy were more than willing to back the far right conservative movements who were willing to work with them than to let communists in who clearly just wanted to get rid of all the old wealthy class.

The same thing is happening all over again. Different playing field, new dynamics but still the same old ball game. Modern wealth can't work with the current system and they know things have to change so its better to back the far right than to let any kind of social democratic system take over. They'd rather destroy everything because they know that whoever is first to build whatever that remains will be the new kings and rulers of the future. Rather than accommodate and grow in any democratic system, they'd rather watch the world burn and then take over the masses who will crawl out of the ashes.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 21 points 1 day ago

Capital leverages instability to transfer wealth to itself from the working class.

Having control over the levers of chaos means that they can not only leverage instability whenever and however they want, they are also singularly able to predict when the chaos will subside. This increases their economic power exponentially.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Destabilization is 100% the point. Create problems, sell solutions. Make the people reliant on the government for everything so they fully own and control you.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 day ago

the deep fucking irony of who's always complaining about welfare queens…

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

destabilize and rebuild

destroy and cash-out.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 0 points 15 hours ago

It's almost leftist cliche to say the system is full of contradictions. Nobody intentionally builds a system full of contradictions, but you get there by not paying attention to what you're doing.

Which is to say that they don't plan to do that. They just don't know what the hell they're doing.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

They know it's all about destroying the government. They're just too chicken shit to say it.