this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2025
450 points (98.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

12163 readers
1581 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 25 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Not only are the proportions really misguided, but the thing is even the road funding is too low. We’re way behind in infrastructure, and yes we still need to be able to get around with personal vehicles

[–] magiccupcake@lemmy.world 46 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Ironically the reason we can't keep up with car infrastructure is because there's too much of it.

It much more costly to maintain, especially when scaling to more lanes.

Reducing space given to cars and giving more to bikes/buses/trains would make it easier to upkeep our current roads.

[–] Crankenstein@lemmy.world 16 points 17 hours ago

Just saw the video from "Not Just Bikes" a few days ago on this exact topic.

The biggest middle finger is that everyone of the people behind these projects knew it would become too expensive to maintain but they all decided it wasn't their problem to solve cause by then they would be long since retired from their position by the time it became a relevant issue.

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 20 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Not only that but suburban areas are actually built using loans that can't be paid back bc suburban areas produce so little taxes they aren't self sustaining

[–] grue@lemmy.world 12 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

That's the thing that gets me about the "but I want to live in a single-family house, not an apartment" people: it's like, sure, that'd be fine if you were willing to actually pay for the true cost of it instead of forcing society to subsidize your lifestyle!

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

But then they cant just afford it with a single working adult in the family like that was ever long term viable instead of a short period of specifically american history that was never gonna last because that's just not possible without either completely rolling over the environment or other countries. The horror!

Not that there aren't plenty of issues with the cost and time requirement of having a family, but my god this whining like life isnt worth living if you can't buy a single family home is annoying me.