this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
612 points (98.3% liked)

196

5891 readers
2301 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Humans have produced enough food, and had the capability to feed every human in the world for over 500 years. Every famine you've seen in the news, all of them, has been caused by keeping food from being delivered to those that are hungry.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 38 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

had the capability to feed every human in the world for over 500 years

Not 500, more like 120 or so years. First thanks to the invention of refrigerated logistics (essential for transporting foodstuffs without them spoiling during the trip) and then thanks to the Haber-Bosch process of extracting nitrogen from the atmosphere, which is essential for industrial fertilizers.

Famines since ~1930 could've been avoided if the "waste" surplus was redirected

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

We've moved preserved food since the discovery of salt. Transport, refrigeration and fertilizer technologies just let our population explode within the last century. The population levels prior to those technologies was more than supported by the transportation and food production capabilities of the time.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

That's just historically untrue. 500 years ago we didn't have much of the technology needed for reliable harvest. Many farms were still highly dependant on rain. No rain, no crops. A late freeze, no crops. Locusts, no crops. You starve.That simple.

This doesn't include the absolute necessity of artificial fertizlier in maintaining the modern population.

Maybe your statement could be true if we had the ability to move crops from areas not expirencing a disaster that could have fixed it, but would have been very difficult and required a global effort. So technically humanity may have produced enough food, but there was not a real way to move it. Even ignoring profit incentives that control logistics and assuming a altruistic system of redistribution, it could take weeks for messages to arrive in areas that did have food. Then it would take weeks to move it. No refrigeration, the fastest you could move is horse.

Seems very unlikely

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The fastest you'd need to move is by horse or ship. Food preservation has been a thing since the discovery of salt. And we didn't need artificial fertilizer centuries ago, because we didn't need to support this many people on limited land, that's a very recent problem. Also cities grew near water for a reason, that's how they got their food. Ships moving food supplies.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Right so how are we increasing salt production? You'll need more workers, which leaves less people available for farming. Could salt production even be scaled to match that demand given the technology? You'll now need an increased network capacity to move the extra salt. More horses, more pots, more baskets, more drivers.

What about places without access by water?

Artificial fertilizer does however allow for a reliable surplus. Something necessary for a redistribution network. You need some kind of fertilizer and natural sources for scalable farming are rare.

You've created a fictional understanding of logistics that sums up to "just move the stuff" without considering the consequences.

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You're misunderstanding my statement, there is no need for increased production, because it already existed. There is no need for an expanded distribution system, it already existed. There is no need for more of anything, because it was already sitting there, just going to somewhere else. The only changes needed were which wagon, or which ship, the only consequences were who made how much profit, and who got credit for it.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Oh no I understand your statements, it's just they are inherently wrong.

Honestly if you said in the last 200 years (maybe even 300) we wouldn't be arguing. I think you're severally over-estimating the surplus created by pre-industrial farmers and the amount of the economy engaged in luxury or profiteering. Most people then produced what they needed and little more. Yes there were portions of the economy tooled to serve the needs of the elite, but I'm not convinced that is enough labor to completely eliminate hunger even if redistributed to production and logistical networks.

We're not even getting into how common slavery was for agricultural production. If we are creating a new system to ensure everyone is fed how do we deal with that?

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I've made a simple historically verifiable statement, if you had any case what so ever, you'd be able to point to a counter example.

[–] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 days ago

I’ve made a simple historically verifiable statement,

Can you provide a source then?

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

I've made a simple historically verifiable statement

You did the opposite. You insisted that your version was true and that re-tooling an entire supply chain is easy.

Your entire arguement is hypotheticals with no source.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I'd assume that intercontinental food shipping would have been rather difficult in the 1500s.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Swallows could grip it by the husk?

[–] Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago

It's not a question of where they grip it, it's a simple matter of weight ratios!

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Wouldn't have been needed, production was distributed enough with populations. And crop collapses were contained to regional problems.