this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2026
590 points (99.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

39379 readers
3956 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MutantTailThing@lemmy.world 227 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (8 children)

Weed is such a harmless little bullshit drug to be so ridiculously over-the-top hyper criminalized in some countries like bruh.

Weed is gonna ruin your life because if you have it on your person imma sens you to prison for 30 fucking years and ruin your life.

It does not. Make. Sense.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 108 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Outlawing cannabis products was essentially an exercise in deliberate systemic racism in the US. (Nixon).

Unsure about the rest of the world.

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 52 points 6 days ago (1 children)

IIRC the US heavily pressured other countries with tariffs to also ban it

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago

good old imperialism. plus they are involved profit off of the illegal drug trade.

[–] embed_me@programming.dev 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

India here, colonial penal code outlawed it but we're too prudish to change it after independence

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

They outlawed it because hemp was a competitor or cotton I thought

[–] miked@piefed.social 30 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It goes farther back than that. DuPont and Hurst had a hand in making cannabis look bad.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dansemacabreingalone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I thought it was about paper prices?

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Yep, William Randolph Hearst fucked everything over for his textile businesses long before Nixon, but it is true that racism played a big factor, namely beginning to refer to it as marijuana instead of cannabis and linking that to those pesky Latinos

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Making cocaine illegal was for black people. Weed was for the hippies.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Oh yeah. To suppress the anti (Vietnam) war protests.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yup. The goal was to make both groups felons to prevent them from voting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zaphod@discuss.tchncs.de 84 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Meanwhile alcohol, one of the most harmful substances, is being consumed like water 😐

[–] ol_capt_joe@piefed.ee 34 points 6 days ago

Delicious, masterfully distilled, barrel aged, water of life πŸ‘‰πŸ˜‰πŸ‘‰πŸ₯ƒ

[–] tomi000@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's the dudes with the bud light cans.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It makes sense if you recognize it as an excuse to harass black and Latino people

β€’And hippies β€’And folks against the war β€’And a way to fill for-profit prisons β€’And a way to control where/how people live β€’And a way to make cotton plantations make more β€’And a way to prohibit something since alcohol bans didn’t work out

[–] Kanda@reddthat.com 8 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I did it all day every day for 12 years, then quit and went back to work like nothing happened. Try that with any other drug

[–] Numenor@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

You were off work smoking weed for 12 years?

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

If you had that chance, are you saying you wouldn't?

load more comments (1 replies)

I can attest to this, I too smoked all day every day and one day I was just too lazy to go buy more weed and I haven’t smoked since. That was 15 years ago.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Yuuup. Had the opportunity to move to Singapore about a decade ago... NOPE. Great place to visit. Amazing people and food. No weed. Don't even think about it.

It's not really because of weed itself, a lot of countries in East Asia have very strict drug laws. Historically it ties into the boxer rebellion and the way the West used opium to control China.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago

Gotta keep feeding the slave force.

[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 6 days ago (12 children)

The only issue I have with weed, and most other drugs, is that you can't easily test for them in a person's system, meaning that you can't know if someone's driving under the influence. This wouldn't be as much of a problem if not for the fact that we have have such a car centric society. I don't like people endangering other people just for a buzz.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 37 points 5 days ago (8 children)

Imagine being so car brained that you base personal freedom around it

[–] abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I don't think this is "car brained". They're not saying anything around public transit, just that we need to have a test for DWI and weed. People shouldn't be jailed for 30 years regardless of the presence of the test or not, but we do still need some other test. Otherwise I guarantee that "don't drive while baked" will be the next infomercial you see in a few years.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Missing the point a bit, we shouldn't base legalization around if people are going to drive their cars on a substance.

[–] abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

100% agreed. Like I said I think it should be legal regardless, the punishments are way too severe for what it is. But on a completely different note, we do still need the tests. I love drinking and I love smoking, but there are rules of the road, and one of those is "don't drive the death machine with impaired judgement".

But yes you're right, the legality shouldn't be based on if "but what if they drive". I'm more saying "if you do some life-disregarding level ignorant" shit you're still getting in trouble.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] GirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The best way to eliminate this risk is public transit.

Yes. I want to ban cars too.

[–] CoolCat@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago (4 children)

You can easily test if they're in someone's system with a saliva test, so your argument doesn't make any sense.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Blood test is better for weed. It's only detectable for 12h vs 24h with saliva.

But levels of THC aren't really correlated with impairment.

[–] CoolCat@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

12 to 24h seems good (maybe even too long imho) in the context of driving a car.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 6 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Not when the levels have no bearing on intoxication.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago

I would even say some drivers might be better drivers with hints of calming THC&CBD in their system...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 days ago (3 children)

They have mouth swabs they use now that can tell for smoking.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 6 points 5 days ago

I am 100% on bike I see no argument on there. Just don't smoke 3 day before you have to drive.

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 days ago

Oh they don't really let it stop them over here, they just use whatever shitty system they have available and let you deal with the false positives and the fact it detects it for much longer than you are intoxicated.

load more comments (6 replies)