this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
431 points (98.0% liked)

science

14689 readers
131 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

From the article:

Scientists have caught a once-in-a-billion-years evolutionary event in progress, as two lifeforms have merged into one organism that boasts abilities its peers would envy. Last time this happened (1.6 billion years ago), certain advanced cells absorbed a type of bacteria that could harvest energy from sunlight. These became organelles called chloroplasts, which gave sunlight-harvesting abilities, as well as a fetching green color, to a group of lifeforms you might have heard of – plants.

And now, scientists have discovered that it’s happening again. A species of algae called Braarudosphaera bigelowii was found to have engulfed a cyanobacterium that lets them do something that algae, and plants in general, can’t normally do – "fixing" nitrogen straight from the air, and combining it with other elements to create more useful compounds.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jimbabwe@lemmy.world 227 points 6 months ago (8 children)

Born too late to explore the world. Born too soon to explore the stars. Born just in time for Algae 2.0 to drop.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago (3 children)

And what a feature drop it was. Right? Or was it? Not sure what "fixing" nitrogen is helpful for...

[–] fireweed@lemmy.world 73 points 6 months ago (5 children)

As any farmer or gardener will tell you, nitrogen is critical for plant growth, and for most plants it's obtained via the soil. Soil nitrogen can be depleted if not replenished (in an agricultural context, by compost or fertilizer), but there's plentiful nitrogen in the atmosphere (which is mostly nitrogen, actually) so any plant that has nitrogen fixing abilities has constant access to this critical nutrient. There currently exist nitrogen-fixing plants (peas and clover for example), but they don't actually do it on their own, they rely on a symbiotic relationship with bacteria.

[–] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago

Ooh could this make for a truly green way to capture carbon and make fertilizer? It would be sweet to have a closed system that grows the algea with solar then you collect it squeze the water out, bury it then start again

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

This is interesting, thank you. So... I'm guessing we don't really want wild plants to gain this ability? We really want to control this ability? What would happen if all plants gained this ability -- would we have any nitrogen left in the atmosphere? I'm guessing we personally (as a species) need the current mixture of air compounds to be a certain way (the way it is now, pretty much) in order not to be poisoned? I've heard about oxygen poisoning -- that's a thing, right?

Or we might want to have some plants gain this ability in order to do terraforming of another planet which has mainly nitrogen in its atmosphere, very far into the future? Would be cool. Maybe.

[–] Hugin@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (3 children)

The N2 in the atmosphere go through a lot of conversions in the bacteria and plant but eventually ends up as nitrates which then break down and release N2 back in the atmosphere.

So no we won't end up with no nitrogen in the atmosphere. Generally we want more nitrogen fixed as most crops deplete the nitrogen and only crops that host the nitrogen fixing bacteria can replenish the fixed nitrogen in the soil.

This is the main reason for crop rotations. Farmers grow corn that depletes the fixed nitrogen and then soy that has bacteria that replenishes it.

It would be great if corn got that feature as a lot of fossil fuels are used to fix nitrogen for fertilizers. See the Haber process for more info. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haber_process

[–] ericjmorey@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

It would be great if corn got that feature

There's a variety of maize that does fix nitrogen:

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/08/amaizeballs/567140/

There are some political and technical hurdles to adapting it more broadly to the agricultural industry.

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Fun fact, one half of the invention of the Haber Bosch process Fritz Haber also invented chemical warfare.

He's partially responsible for saving perhaps billions of lives through the Haber Bosch process and killing millions through the use and proliferation of chemical weapons.

We did get this banger out of it though

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

So long as he's net positive, eh..? 🥹

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Thank you for sharing all this insight! Cheers!

[–] Morgoon@startrek.website 3 points 6 months ago

Oh wow, didn't even think about that. It'd be like the great oxygen event which almost killed all life in earth https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Oxidation_Event

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 25 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Nitrogen is crucial for duplicating DNA, which needs to happen for vells to divide. Despite being over 70% of the atmosphere, nitrogen gas is incredibly inert, so most organisms cant use it for any metabolic purposes. There are many bacteria that are able to break down nitrogen gas into useable nitrates, most famously those that live in the root systems of legimes like soy and peanuts, which is why American corn farmers grow so much soy.

[–] KidnappedByKitties@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] Hupf@feddit.de 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] KidnappedByKitties@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

To the Mun!

[–] dyathinkhesaurus@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Fertiliser is one option.

[–] isles@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

The ocean is only marginally explored.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 97 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If they saw this happen, then it happens far more often than once in a billion years.

[–] DickFiasco@lemm.ee 59 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The article says it's been in-progress for the last 100 million years, so "once in a billion years" is really like a 1:10 chance. Gotta get those clicks though.

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

That's fair. I expect there are quite a few examples of this happening in various places we are yet to discover.

Some thrive, some die out, but it seems to be a normal evolution of life.

[–] NounsAndWords@lemmy.world 53 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Very interested to see where this goes over the next several thousands of years.

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 39 points 6 months ago

Very interested to see where this goes over the next several hundreds of thousands of years.

Ftfy

[–] GrabtharsHammer@lemmy.world 50 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So the last time was chloroplasts, right? And that worked out super well for all the other organisms and didn't do anything catastrophic to the atmosphere, right?

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 months ago

Meh, what bad thing could possibly happen if our nitrogen concentration goes down dramatically? I mean that stuff is basically useless /s

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 6 months ago (2 children)

man i can't wait until 20 years from now when scientists find out that this is actually like, really fucking common or some dumb bullshit like that.

Or at least i hope that happens, because it would be very funny.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Its probably very common. I would suspect its happened before and the larger barrier is unicellular to multicellular life.

i'm guessing the generic is very common, but the specific event here is very rare. Like a unix time party for instance.

[–] UnpluggedFridge@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (4 children)

A similar thing happens with cockroaches where crucial bacteria are absorbed into cells to ensure inheritance in offspring.

words spoken by someone who has spent 30 years studying the reproductive cycle of the cockroach

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 26 points 6 months ago (2 children)

So what do we get this time? I hope it's some uncontrollable monster that eats plastic and religious zealots.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Breathing and using nitrogen directly. I guess that would give some kind of plant that needs less or no soil.

[–] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Legumes fix nitrogen from the air and still need soil.

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

They gonna use this to make corn

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SGG@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Better keep Captain Janeway away from it. She'll un-tuvix them so fast it'll make your head spin

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

You commit one murder and no one let's you live it down, meanwhile The Sisko renders a planet uninhabitable to humans and tricks a foreign government into joining your war and no one bats an eye.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

This isn't that uncommon, it's just really hard for it to survive into reproduction. Protists are notorious for it, this one alone has at least three separate bacterial symbiotes and even replaced it's own mitochondria(which themselves are endosymbiotic bacteria) with another bacteria, essentially reinventing the fucking wheel: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mixotricha_paradoxa

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

When mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell actually happens IRL again

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

As a layman, my interpretation is that scientists have observed a mutation in some prehistoric cells / creatures that is likely positive. In this case an algae and a bacteria somehow combined in such a way that they have become something new and better.

As an optimistic guesser it seems like this probably happens fairly often and is either unlikely to survive or replicate for long. But, having observed something that we have known about is further evidence that we understand ongoing evolution and may have a better, more sound understanding of how life came to be.

I guess that's probably interesting because it helps us better understand what the building blocks for life are, and as we discover them on other planets or in other places in outer space we may better be equipped to understand how or if life exists outside our own world.

[–] kelargo@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] WolfLink@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What about fusion? Can it cause fusion?

[–] nandeEbisu@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

They don't have arms and legs to do the dance with.

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

I think this means Ents will become a thing now.

load more comments
view more: next ›