this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
723 points (98.7% liked)

News

23266 readers
4060 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Some Democrats say his comments, directed at a Christian audience, signaled his plans to be a dictator. His campaign says he was talking about ‘uniting’ the country, and experts point to his ‘deliberately ambiguous’ speaking style.

Democratic lawmakers and Vice President Harris’s campaign joined a chorus of online critics in calling out remarks Donald Trump aimed at a Christian audience on Friday, arguing that the former president and current Republican presidential nominee had implied he would end elections in the United States if he won a second term.

At the conclusion of his speech at the Believers Summit in West Palm Beach, Fla., Trump said, “Christians, get out and vote, just this time. You won’t have to do it anymore. … You got to get out and vote. In four years, you don’t have to vote again. We’ll have it fixed so good you’re not going to have to vote.”

Democrats and others interpreted the comments as signaling how a second Trump presidency would be run, a reminder that he previously said he would not be a dictator upon returning to office “except for Day One.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 125 points 3 months ago (6 children)

TRUMP:  "We'll have it fixed so good you're not going to have to vote."

MEDIA: "Oh there he goes again with his ''deliberately ambiguous' phrasing..."

What fucking part of that sentence was ambiguous???

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 39 points 3 months ago

well he's gonna say they're fixing the country so good that you won't feel like you have to vote again or something. this has long been their usual thing, called implausible deniability. it only works if everyone else is dumb. unfortunately for them, they're the dumb ones thinking they're clever with these.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Melody@lemmy.one 110 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Yeah this isn't surprising.

What's funnier is how he acts like a toddler with his hand caught in the cookie jar; blaming it on his imaginary friend or whatever else is convenient to blame at hand.

Make no mistake; this is their plan. For far right extremist believers; this is their most fevered and deepest desire dream. They are, unfortunately, thinking that they are the only ones who are "right" to rule the world; despite how wrong they are and despite literally everything and everyone telling them they CANNOT do that.

To be clear; these kinds of minds have fallen to the trap that religion breeds.

When used in moderation; religion can be helpful for people both mentally and emotionally. It can allow them to cope with, and accept, reality and when they abandon all fear and put faith into something it can bring themselves back to focusing on things more productively.

When used in excess; religion can breed utter lack of reason and sanity. This is the trap. This is when someone loses touch with reality. When you abandon all fear and put faith into something; you become the most reckless thing imaginable; and the damage to the world and others you can do with this is virtually unlimited.

As they say; "The road to Hell is paved with 'Good Intentions'.". There is nothing more dangerous than a fool who believes he is doing the right thing. The foolish cannot be reasoned with, or dissuaded from their path, for they are a fool.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

Religion has always been a tool for controlling the masses. Humans are flawed, broken creatures that naturally abuse power. Religion simply builds a framework to execute that abuse.

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of earth.

This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be "cured" against one's will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals.

C. S. Lewis

[–] aleph@lemm.ee 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Agreed, but this isn't unique to religion -- the same can be said of political ideologies.

[–] iiGxC@slrpnk.net 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Religion tends to have untestifiable claims and poor epistemology built in and encouraged tho. It's rare for ideologies to have that.

[–] aleph@lemm.ee 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Epistemology isn't the determining factor when it comes to human beings doing terrible things to each other on the rationale that it is for "the greater good" or the "natural order".

Nazi Germany, the Khmer Rouge, the Cultural Revolution, European colonialism, etc saw millions dead because one group of people though they had the right to control society and shape it in the way they saw fit.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 83 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"Deliberately ambiguous" isn't the excuse these people seem to think it is.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 42 points 3 months ago (4 children)

I don't even see how anyone could argue it's ambiguous. Can anyone give one plausible, specific theory about what else it could've meant?

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 39 points 3 months ago (2 children)

For the record, I don't think there is any ambiguity in the slightest about the leader of an insurrection saying this alongside "I will be a dictator" and whatever else.

However, what Fox and other propagandists would say is that, "he's going to fix the country and everyone will like that and vote Repub forevermore." In complete defiance of the objective reality that Donald did nothing of the sort 2017-21.

Donald is a corrupt and racist rapist. Polarizing as fuck. Repugnant deplorables love him and everyone else is utterly disgusted.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Yeah. Our media needs to ask the question I did. Okay Republicans, if this doesn't mean that, explain in detail how this meant "unity". They won't be able to say anything specific and they will squirm and at least some young kids trying to figure things out right now will see which party is fascist. Just letting them make some vague bullshit statement and presenting it as neutral is beyond irresponsible

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 7 points 3 months ago

At best he's not able to formulate even these simple statements, imagine him speaking about 3rd world war and saying something like this. But yes, he did mean what everybody understood.

[–] arken@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Well, since he's talking specifically to christians, in the context that he wants all christians to vote: he could have meant that he will fix all their concerns during his term -- no more abortions, "christian values" in school, etc -- so that next election, they don't have to worry anymore. Just come out and vote this time, he'll fix America so good that the liberals can't even undo it if they win the next one (but they won't, because everyone will be happy in this new golden age).

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But democrats no longer having any power is exactly the fascist implication we are talking about.

[–] arken@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Well, there's a difference between democrats not having any power because of a coup or because R did their politics so well...I'm not defending this interpretation btw, but you asked.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] suction@lemmy.world 67 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Backlash my ass. If he’s still polling ~ 40% it’s not him who’s the problem, but whoever is part of those 40%

[–] pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml 30 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Concentrated media ownership is the problem. We had rules against it until W Bush and his Republican Congress eliminated them even though everyone said this would happen.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] spaghetti_hitchens@kbin.run 48 points 3 months ago (2 children)

"Deliberately ambiguous"

I don't think that means what they think that means.

[–] Sc00ter@lemm.ee 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Being deliberate with your word choice so the intention of your words is ambiguous. Similar to "intentionally vague"

[–] worldwidewave@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Trump’s never had the ability to be deliberate with anything, certainly not the tired and diminished Trump we’ve got this cycle.

Trump also only has ambiguity as a strength, because he doesn’t have the mental capacity, or attention span, for specificity. You think he can detail a 5 point plan without getting distracted about sharks and electrocution? His voters like him spoon-feeding him 3 word slogans, and that’s just about all that he can muster these days.

[–] modifier@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago

It's an interesting contrast to 'he just tells it like it is' from the first time around.

[–] slickgoat@lemmy.world 44 points 3 months ago (2 children)

He continually tells us what he's going to do and we are continually shocked when he does it.

[–] Emmy@lemmy.nz 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well, largely we don't expect politicians to keep promises....

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

They always keep the shitty ones.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm shocked nobody does anything about it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world 43 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'd be worried if he wasn't getting backlash. Actually, I'm still worried because there clearly isn't enough backlash.

We all know what he's insinuating.

[–] havocpants@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago

Not enough backlash? He tried to overthrow the democracy he's now running for and inexplicably isn't in prison or being executed for treason.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 41 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Fox News will yell "That's not what he meant, crazy liberals! You're the real authoritarians here because you didn't have a primary for Harris!" while the ensuing debate shifts the Overton window towards authoritarianism as discussions about having an American dictator are normalized.

Trump is so toxic for America.

obligatory propaganda vaccine:

Trump's statements are reckless and unacceptable for a politician, and he probably was hinting at a dictatorship using plausible deniability, given that he attempted a coup after the last election. We have no reason to take him at his word anymore.

The DNC elector process is the only viable way of choosing a candidate with the looming 2 week Ohio ballot deadline, as the alternative would be to not run a candidate at all. Harris is the most popular candidate out of those willing to run, and well-informed, locally-elected politicians across the country have independently endorsed her without DNC pressure. Primary reform (or even better, election reform) would be great for democratizing, optimizing, and de-risking the candidate selection process for both parties, but the DNC has not abused their power here by choosing the most popular candidate in an emergency situation.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (3 children)

A sane voting system would be so lovely. How about STAR voting and fucking ZERO primaries? Fuck the party politics.

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Amen.

We waste so much energy and productivity with party politics. I don’t give a damn about your clics.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I want the defenders to explain in specific terms how this wasn't about being a dictator. "It was about unity" isn't a statement. It doesn't near making sense.

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

That last line is choice.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 27 points 3 months ago

We’ll have it fixed so good you’re not going to have to vote.

How... ambiguous...

[–] Monstrosity@lemm.ee 25 points 3 months ago

"Some Democrats say..." Way to marginalize the obvious threat, BezosPost.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Reporting on the response to the dangerous promise he made makes it seem like the article is trying to prompt sympathy for him.

Poor Donald must face a consequence for saying something shitty.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 months ago

“When people show you who they are, believe them the first time.”

This is only the 500th time but I guess some people are slow learners.

[–] voluble@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's cryptofascism. The 'OK' hand gesture, this - fascists will call you crazy if you get upset about it. But every little thing is a seed planted.

Unfortunately this fascist attitude doesn't end with a Trump electoral defeat. These seeds are finding fertile soil. They are growing into something.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FarFarAway@startrek.website 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

What if he doesn't mean that he's going to be a dictator. What if he means he will purge the country of anyone that doesn't think like him and his followers, therefore they never have to vote again because everyone will be on the same page. J/k...mostly

[–] samokosik@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Trump, unlike many other presidents, had good relations with Kim and Putin. That’s quite logical - you wanna have good relations with your idols…

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Imho his back needs quite a lot of lashing. Catoninetails preferred

load more comments
view more: next ›