Here is a better source. National Review isn't a credible source.
https://apnews.com/article/racism-ron-desantis-florida-1a5b1e2158b868848abf703633f5c8f6
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
Here is a better source. National Review isn't a credible source.
https://apnews.com/article/racism-ron-desantis-florida-1a5b1e2158b868848abf703633f5c8f6
I don’t like NR and their conservative bias is very much on their sleeve, but “isn’t a credible source” is a bit of a stretch.
They lean pretty far right and are known to use emotional sensationalism in their articles. I'd much rather get my news from AP.
I would too, they are not my first pick, but saying a source isn’t credible is a big accusation. Idk I’m probably overthinking it. When I think of not credible I think of Tucker Carlson, Fox News, Breitbart. Truly lying sources.
great point.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/national-review/
right wing spun but credible and mostly factual.
You're cool to state your concerns.
The fact that you weren't dogpiled caught my eye.
Just sayin'
Appreciate it. Unfortunately I know myself and sometimes I come off incredibly strong/hostile or I am too charitable with not a whole lot of in between. But I am really, really trying hard to take a step back these days and assess things with a little cooler head.
Lemmy dogpiles by default. Far, far worse than reddit ever did. And I've proven it (to myself!).
So, I try to call it out when I see it (always), but I also notice when it doesn't happen, such as now.
I’m not sure it’s worse than Reddit lol but I feel you. Appreciate the kind words
Must be v careful to avoid dogpiling. When legit trynna make a nuanced point, gotta be obvious about your actual view before getting into the nuance.
after the fox news docs were released in the dominion lawsuit where all the anchors knew they were lying but they did it because they feared losing watchers to newsmax should be a lesson in how the audience (and modern conservatives in particular) affects the market and how having a conspiratorial fan base will necessarily result in a credibility spiral.
Honestly it should be called the "Fox Newsmax" effect, or something. So its like, yes, the national review is probably in a similar spiral.
the national review is probably in a similar spiral
I mean unless you have evidence pointing to that that’s not a fair assumption.
It's amazing to me that someone who has the wherewithal to rise to the highest offices in the land, can also be such a blubbering insecure weak little bitch that they need to legislate against having to hear about reality. But then again, Donald fucking Trump became president and might do so again. I guess the highest offices in the land are actually pretty easy to get to after all 🤷
Easy if you have rich donors
And no personal ethics at all. I dont think they even know what ethics are to begin with.
Let's not place the blame only on DeSantis. There's a large portion of the US who would be fine with Jim Crow being a thing again. Florida voters elected him because they knew he'd do this shit
A federal Mandate should be put in place where questionable laws which possibly violate the Constitution are not enforced until they are found legitimate.
He’s like a monkey throwing shit at the wall to see what sticks.
This seems to be a national problem
I like the intent behind that, but it would also be scary to give the courts even more power at this time in history.
The court decides regardless, this would prevent unconstitutional laws from going into effect
Yeah but the dynamic would probably change quite a bit if they were gatekeepers up front and new laws had to avoid a presidential veto plus a court veto. And it would let the courts act on their own rather then simply deciding cases that end up on their docket.
Like I said, the idea sounds like a nice thing. In just think we’ve seen enough to know that the execution would be a nightmare.
It would probably take a constitutional amendment to make questionably unconstitutional law something to be reviewed before it being implemented. Also include a timeline which it must be complete.
I know none of this will happen but I can dream
Considering how most Republicans wait for one governor to pass an insane law that survives court appeals then all follow suit, it’s good to see one get so thoroughly crushed before the copycats start.
go back to sleep, sheep
They did all this and still Meatball Ron and Abhorrent Abbott were ignored in favour of couchfucker as Trump's VP pick. Sad!
Good. Also, fuck the National Review.
"permanent" here means it will hold until the inevitable appeal to scRotus
Lets see what Biden's plan to deal with them is. He's promised to do some kind of SCOTUS reform act before the end of his term.
the current composition of congress makes any significant changes impossible to achieve.
best that can happen is introduction of such legislation, and their subsequent defeat or burial, this session will call-out republicans who block it--and then they get booted by voters in november in favor of those who will seek meaningful changes next year.
Awesome move from the judge.