this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
1012 points (98.9% liked)

Today I Learned

17707 readers
182 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TerkErJerbs@lemm.ee 151 points 2 months ago (14 children)

I find it strange that more people haven't put it together yet. The stuff plastics are made of is literally toxic byproduct from the O&G industry. Yes some of the products have extremely functional uses, but for the rest of it, they're literally selling us their toxic waste and trying to make us responsible for disposing of it.

They might as well be standing outside the grocery stores with a barrel of goo and offering you a portion of it (for a price of course!) on your way out. So then you take it home and try to figure out what to do with it, and feel bad when you realize there is no way to dispose of it in an ethical way which is why they're shoving the responsibility onto you.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 61 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That’s why they should pay a tax for every pound of plastic they produce, with an equivalent refund for every pound they certifiably dispose of properly.

When you have to clean up your own mess you get good at it.

[–] TerkErJerbs@lemm.ee 32 points 2 months ago

They won't even clean up their own oil well sites. Look up how many oil companies hide all their profits and then declare bankruptcy so that they can get the taxpayers to clean up after a given oilfield runs dry.

I don't have a lot of hope in them taking care of the other end of the process either, unless it's by force.

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It really is frustrating. Like we even have resin codes. Little numbers printed that should indicate what kind of plastic it is.

I’m in Seattle. We have a robust recycling system. I still can’t find anywhere what resin code plastics they accept. The website just says “plastic bottles and jugs.”

I pay to use Ridwell. They accept plastic film and, as of recently, “multi-layer plastic.”

The only way to tell these apart is just by judging the plastic for how it feels. Plastic film is stretchier while multi-layer tends to be crinkly? Half the plastic we dispose of does not fall firmly in either camp, so we just do our best.

Why does it have to be this hard?

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 26 points 2 months ago

Because recycling is not meant to be effective it's meant to pass blame onto consumers

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] tilefan@lemm.ee 62 points 2 months ago (5 children)

80% of the shit you put in your recycling bin goes straight into a landfill. plastic recycling was a giant greenwashing scam by the oil industry

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Quite honestly, going to a landfill seems so so so much better than the alternative: going into the environment and oceans, turning into microplastics and getting into food chains.

At least landfills are contained. Bury the shit until we have the tech to deal with it.

Some day, between the plastics, nutrients from organics, e-waste, landfills are going to be a goldmine.

[–] exanime@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Quite honestly, going to a landfill seems so so so much better than the alternative: going into the environment and oceans, turning into microplastics and getting into food chains.

Eh, it pretty much does all that bad stuff from the landfills

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 60 points 2 months ago (2 children)

that 8% more than i thought

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 36 points 2 months ago (2 children)

9% is only recycled once, only 1% has been truly reused multiple times, so you're close enough.

Also:

Of the remaining waste, 12% was incinerated and 79% was either sent to landfills or lost to the environment as pollution.

They're the same thing. Incinerated is lost as pollution, it just happened to have one more use on the way there.

And I just realized, this wikipedia page linked is almost 10 years out of date!

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Incinerated plastic releases green house gases and some amount of micro plastics in the uncombusted ash.

Landfill plastic seemingly just erodes into micro plastics over long time scales.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'll be honest, that's actually more than I would have guessed (ballpark would have been 5% or under), sad as that is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 38 points 2 months ago

9 percent seems high.

[–] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 2 months ago (13 children)

I read somewhere that because recycling plastic isn’t profitable, under the capitalist system there’s no incentive to do so.

Most plastics due for recycling just gets shipped off to poor countries for “reclycing” but isn’t at all, and a lot of it just ends up in the ocean.

So you’re better off just throwing plastics in the garbage where it will at least end up in landfill and not in the ocean.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (4 children)

It's because you can't recycle plastic really. Each time you heat it up to melt it it loses its properties. A recyclable material is for instance aluminium, which keeps on being awesome. I tried various recycled plastics for a business I run, none of it was strong enough. Recycled lego, recycled car bumpers, nada. And then the question is - why would I buy the recycled plastic that doesn't work when it's like 30 cents cheaper. Pellets are so cheap in fact, that I could buy a tonne, use up 100kgs, throw the rest away and still be fine.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's just a bad material that's cheap to make things out of.

Once used, to my knowledge, it can't be reused as the same thing, so they "recycle" it into road surfacing etc, which I'm sure doesn't end up fragmenting into tiny bits over the years and ending up in water sources...

And I'm not sure there's a good way to get away from it completely. Even drink cans have a small layer of plastic inside to stop it reacting with the metal. Glass is probably the most environmentally friendly (if you just wash and reuse), but a bitch to get it back in one piece.

Time to tax the ever loving shit out of plastic tbh. And yes, prices will go up, but you know what? They go up anyway. They can only take as much as we have, and they're already taking it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] randompasta@lemmy.today 33 points 2 months ago (4 children)

The recycling symbol for plastics was a great bit of marketing for the plastics industry. 'Just buy a new thing and no worries you can just recycle it.'

Future geologists are going to see a marine deposit of plastic and be able to date exactly the age of the rock layer.

[–] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

They purposely made their symbols for non-recylable types of plastic look like the recycling symbol.

[–] echolalia@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 months ago

Survivors of the resource wars will send their children to the plastic mines to work for bottle caps

[–] makingrain@lemm.ee 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Don't forget nuclear fallout. There's even a term for when humans started to irrevocably fuck Earth: the Anthropocene.

[–] weariedfae@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The committee recently pulled the plug on the Anthropocene unfortunately. It was never official and they just rejected it this year.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And heavy metals from burning fossil fuels.

Just a thin, oily, radioactive, toxic smear in the record.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

That could be fixed with “virgin nondegradable plastic” taxes, deposit/return fees, and regulations on single use plastics.

But unfortunately the fossil fuel industry calls the shots in most places.

[–] Huckledebuck@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (9 children)

Reduce, reuse, recycle in that order. Recycling should be the final option to dealing with our trash.

I believe the focus for most people should be reduce (including myself).

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Could you tell that to all the companies out there who use plastic?

Remember when Snapple tried to spin moving to plastic bottles like it was a good thing, like 5 years ago?

[–] Huckledebuck@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Agreed, but there is also far too much consumer push back. Sunchips tried to make a more biodegradable bag, but people complained that they were too loud.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That is a way higher number than I expected.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wafflez@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Can't find for total glass but just current rates for glass: "US’s roughly 33% glass-recycling rate" "90% recycling rate in Switzerland, Germany, and other European countries"

https://cen.acs.org/materials/inorganic-chemistry/glass-recycling-US-broken/97/i6

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

In my area they don’t recycle glass. I was so surprised when I moved here and learned that. Glass and aluminum are the two most worth it/possible afaik.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 months ago (5 children)

not to mention it doesn't matter where it goes, most plastic can't be recycled or is not efficient to recycle it. Really need to just not use plastic as a whole

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] cashmaggot@piefed.social 20 points 2 months ago (7 children)

I worked at a university at one point in my life, and they were quite proud about their recycling plan. The janitors though, would just take the trash and the recycling and put the two bags together and throw them both away. I never really lived anywhere that recycled outside of the West Coast. But is it actually being recycled here? Is this the 9%?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (10 children)

NGL that's more than I thought, but nevertheless: don't use plastic if you can avoid it. It's not easy to recycle.

For instance, for beverages, prefer cans or your own glass / metal water bottles.

That said, 9% is a huge lot better than 0%. edit or considering the amount of plastics we use, a huge lot better than 8% too.

[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago

The older i get the more disgusting i find plastic. I would never buy plastic tupperware ever again, drinking out of plastic bottles just feels wrong.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Almost like plastics recycling has been a scam all along perpetrated by the corporations to greenwash their business.

Reduce, then reuse, and if the other two cannot occur; recycle.

[–] Repelle@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This is absolutely correct but still not the whole story. Recycling for glass and aluminum and steel can be done essentially infinitely creating a largely closed loop (though for glass in particular we really need to return to our old reuse practices). By using the same language for plastic as we do for better recycling methods we still make plastic recycling sound better than it is, even when reduction and reuse are emphasized.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

That's significantly more than I was expecting.

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

More than I assumed, tbh. We need to start taxing plastic bottles.

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (6 children)

How the hell are plastic bottles going to pay taxes? Let's not even think about giving them jobs when unemployment is already high.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] lengau@midwest.social 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Plug for Climate Town's great video about plastic recycling

Bonus: if you've never used Nebula before (or you're already a subscriber), here it is ad-free from Nebula: https://nebula.tv/videos/climatetown-plastic-recycling-is-an-actual-scam-climate-town

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] h3mlocke@lemm.ee 16 points 2 months ago (4 children)

9% sounds a lot higher than I'd previously heard

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The other 91% is in my balls.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] doingthestuff@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

In my area you have to pay a lot extra for a recycling bin, and they only accept two kinds of plastic.

Then it came out they were just shipping it overseas to be recycled but sometimes it was ending up in landfills anyway. There are only a few houses on our street with a recycling bin out each week.

[–] scala@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It's amazing we stopped using the "plastic" from plant matter, which is renewable vs petroleum plastic.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 13 points 2 months ago

It's because plastic is do durable that 91% of the plastic ever produced is still in use, right ?

Right !????

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I have gradually wondered if the issue has not been in our obsession with plastic specifically, but our need for sanitation of every object. "We need a material that will preserve its shape in transit and operation; but we then want it to gently break down into nature when we're done with it." No matter what materials of what strength we invent, that's always going to be an oxymoron. There's a reason people criticize biodegradable materials as often falling apart.

Don't get me wrong, I'm sure medicine has made tremendous advances through the preservation of sealed instruments and drugs, especially for those with sensitive immune systems. But the 3000% thorough sanitization we keep of every single object we interact with has had a very gradual impact on our planet. I kind of want to envision just how fatal of a health risk it would carry if so much of our food wasn't triple-secure-wrapped, and whether that's comparable to the current impact of widespread plastic.

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 11 points 2 months ago

No, the problem has never been us at all. We don't run Coca Cola Co. We don't decide how laundry detergent is packaged. We don't manufacture excess plastic drums and lined tanks for unnecesary use cases. We don't flood the market with cheap dinnerware, plates, cups, bowls, etc.

Big corporations do all of that. Run by dozens of people who do not care what we think.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›