this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
875 points (97.3% liked)

News

23268 readers
4893 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] galaxies_collide@lemmy.world 129 points 1 year ago (3 children)

She’ll just get crowdfunding money from Republicans (white domestic terrorists).

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 113 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I mean, either way it's a win. If she gets $2 each from a shitload of right wing fuckheads, that means we made ~50,000 right wing fuckheads pay to support gay marriage.

[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s 50,000 people paying for the attempt at preventing gay marriage, not in support of it.

[–] AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Paying for a failed attempt. So it's kind of impotence squared if it happens.

That's $100,000 that won't get to those people unless somebody else raises it because I doubt very seriously Kim Davis has $100,000.

[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Recognizing that these bios mean next to nothing, a quick google suggests her net worth could be in the tens of millions.

The grift (potentially) pays well.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

If only we could collect their names and tell everyone about how they feel!

load more comments (2 replies)

That's fine, victims get their money and some dumb cunt in Ohio is a little bit poorer. Sounds like a win-win to me.

[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds like socialism to me

[–] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I get the joke but to be clear, handouts are not a problem for these folks, so long as the Jesus Strings are fully attached.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everyone has the right to follow their religion. If Big Kim didn't want to disobey her God, she is allowed to: by resigning her position in protest and joining a monastery.

I believe "Get thee to a nunnery." might be appropriate.

[–] Drewdp@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (4 children)

So judge David B ruled Kim Davis had to pay David E and David M 50k each. .

I was not aware there were so many Dave's involved.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

These are the Daves that I know I know, these are the Daves I know. Some of them go by David but most of them just go by Dave. They all have different hands but come from different moms

[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I have this song on my phone so I can listen to it whenever I please!

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Dave’s not here…

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Basically... a portion of each of the David's legal fees

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Eight year legal battle and a payout you'll never see. Seems fair.

[–] azn03@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I was just thinking: this woman doesn't have 100k. Lol.

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

I've said it before, if your religion is preventing you form doing your job, either change you religion or change your job.

[–] KillAllPoorPeople@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

She's going to start a GoFundMe and get like $500k and walk away wealthy. I hate how fucked up our society is.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (8 children)

$400K isn't "wealthy" by any calculation. It's not nothing, but it's not enough to live on. Unless your expenses are like $16K per year.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Give me 400k right now and I'll buy a house and live forever on fuck all because I'm safe and secure in my own home. That means so much, owning your home is wealth.

[–] KillAllPoorPeople@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Getting $400k in one go absolutely makes you wealthy. This isn't $400k over a lifetime.

[–] snippyfulcrum@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Kentucky is also a fairly low cost of living state which is something to factor in too.

My husband and I combined make waaaaaaay the hell less than 400k a year and we aren't rich but I'd say we live fairly comfortably here.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] WorldWideLem@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is that legal? I know you're not allowed to fundraise off your crimes, does that also apply to civil cases?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] natecox@programming.dev 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t understand why one couple got $100,000, while the other couple got nothing. I wish the article had expanded on that a bit more.

[–] lazyvar@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I was wondering myself as well so I got you.

Basically what happened was that these were technically two separate cases with two separate jury pools to decide the amount for damages.

One jury pool came to the decision that there were damages and awarded $50k to each individual in couple 1 (totaling $100k) while the other jury pool independently decided that no damages should be awarded based on the same evidence.

Keep in mind that this region is generally pretty hostile towards LGBTQ+ people. The judge had the option to overrule a jury if they find that the decision doesn’t match the evidence in the case.

The lawyer of this lady is actually hoping for that in the case that lead to a $100k damages award as per the quote below.

“Two juries heard the same evidence and the same arguments, and only one jury returned a verdict that was based on the facts and the evidence presented at trial,” Daniel Schmid, senior litigation counsel for Liberty Counsel and one of Davis’ attorneys, told CNN via email. “In the Yates case, the jury returned a verdict of $0.00 because that is what the evidence required.”

“Without any evidentiary support, the Ermold jury reached a verdict of $50,000 for each plaintiff. The evidence presented at trial simply does not support that verdict, and Ms. Davis will be filing a motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict next week,” Schmid said. “Ms. Davis trusts that the courts reviewing the evidence presented will see that the Ermold verdict lacks any evidentiary support and will agree with the Yates jury that the plaintiffs are entitled to no damages whatsoever.”

Source

[–] natecox@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Pretty frustrating example of how our legal system is broken.

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 20 points 1 year ago

Be a joke; go broke

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Thoughts and prayers.

[–] esadatari@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

aaaaahahahahahahaha that bitch can get fucked for all hundred k of it.

[–] Anonymousllama@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Finally some good news. Still amazed it's taken this long to get a resolution

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

US district judge David Bunning said that Davis “cannot use her own constitutional rights as a shield to violate the constitutional rights of others while performing her duties as an elected official”.

[…]

During this week’s trial, Davis argued that she was protected from litigation due to qualified immunity, a doctrine that protects government officials from lawsuits accusing them of violating someone’s constitutional rights.

"I shouldn't have to do this thing because of my beliefs."

"I shouldn't be guilty because I was acting on behalf of the government."

Pretty big valley between these two arguments. Roast this fucking turd.

"Good Christian" Adulterer Kim Davis conceived twins with her lover while married to another man.

“If a man commits adultery with another man’s wife—with the wife of his neighbor—both the adulterer and the adulteress are to be put to death” (Leviticus 20:10)

Yet another example of an evangelical conservative expecting to be protected by laws but not bound by them, while everyone else is to be bound by laws but not protected by them.

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 12 points 1 year ago

For abusing authority she doesn't have. Save up Kim,

[–] n0m4n@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Davis went far out of her way to screw over some people. Bigotry has costs.

[–] user91@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

No way this red has that money

[–] meldroc@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

GAAAAH!!! MY EYES!!! I'd forgotten how ugly that woman is, inside and out!

Does she still wear her homemade birth control dresses?

[–] sadreality@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

FAFO

I guess no immunity for her?

Should been police!

[–] DoctorTYVM@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Uplifting news!

[–] uint8_t@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

🦀🦀🦀

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 4 points 1 year ago

She might have to sell one of her Trump-rally powerboats or something

[–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

Nelson: "Ha ha!"

[–] Binthinkin@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Is this Kyle Rittenhouses wife?

[–] IamRoot@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Fucked around…

[–] spiderjuzce@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

She looks like a gross pig

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›