Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
Jimmy Kimmel shows polls on (I think) his Thursday monologue that showed Harris ahead, Trump ahead, and both of them tied.
Polls clearly don't mean shit anymore.
Polls clearly don’t mean shit anymore.
I mean, they are significant, and they're one of our better ways to get information about what's going on. But there are complexities, and you can't ignore them.
First, obviously, there's the issue that any polling thing has, which is the possibility for error. If you call people on phones, some people won't respond, and those people may not be an even cross-section of society.
Second, the Presidential election isn't a popular vote. What matters is what's happening in the swing states. So presenting the output of a national popular poll -- which for some reason, a lot of media organizations do, I can only imagine because it's simpler to understand -- isn't a very good metric for who will win the Presidential election. There's correlation, sure, but the difference can be quite significant in very close elections like this.
Third, voter turnout matters, not just who a voter prefers.
To compensate for various issues like this, you develop a model that takes input -- for which polls are one, but only one, source of inputs -- and then train it on past elections. You can model things like increased or reduced response rates to polls among various demographics.
That can be useful, but it's still not an oracle that can see into the future. Models always deal with a simplified view of the world, aren't omniscient. We won't know for absolutely certain how well a model performs in a particular election until that election. Maybe it turns out that there's a ton of hail on that day, and that there's a Twitter trend to not go out in hail, or something equally off-the-wall.
If you want to know for sure, the answer is wait for the election.
If you want to get our best guess, the answer is "we can make some predictions, using polling data, statistical analysis, and other historical information, though it'll inevitably have some level of uncertainty". Right now, I think that it's a pretty decent consensus that the race is pretty close, but that Harris has been generally improving her position. No legitimate person modeling the election is going to simply outright call the election at this point, though. They'll just give estimates as to likelihoods of outcomes.
Yeah, they're entirely meaningless this election cycle. These poll leads have been sitting in margin of error zones the whole damn time, which means you cannot make a useful inference from the data in the poll.
It's so close you can slightly tweak the conditions and who you ask and WHAT you ask them to push the poll data to support anything you want.
Good for propaganda, bad for anything else.
Also, who answers an unknown number from their phone anymore other than the elderly and the lonely? That's not exactly a good cross-section of voters.
There was an interesting thing from the NYT where they talked about their phone poll response rate being 2%.
I can't imagine that they had worse or better response rates annoying people with their shit than anyone else would, so it's probably a good wager that all the polls see 2% response rates and thus are based off a shockingly small profile of people.
A small dataset can still be statistically significant, depending on how and where the data is obtained and structured.
That being said, everything involving Trump has had bad polling since he first started running. Poor polling isn't particularly new when he's involved. Some of it is spot on, others wildly inaccurate.
I'm surprised marketing companies don't release their stats since they have a better idea of who everyone is going to vote for than anyone else. But then they'd have to admit that they know.
They'd also have to not have a horse race, which is what is in their best interest.
That doesn't mean it's meaningless. It means it's a very close race.
Polls are simply educated guesses. Nobody knows for sure until the election is certified and POTUS is sworn in.
But how do you even make an educated guess anymore? So few people answer their phone now that there's no way you'll get any idea.
They use other survey methods. Go read any methodology and it will describe how they collected their data.
But that would require learning stuff instead of spouting off whatever negative shit feels good
They just keep going down the list until they have enough respondents to use for the data.
I don't think there is a list of phone numbers out there that can give you anything close to an educated guess for people under 30. They don't even like to talk on the phone. They'd rather be texted.
Polling companies have a standard number of people they need that will cover their demographic requirements (ie: age, income, location). They keep going down their list of phone numbers until those requirements are fulfilled.
But again, how can they accurately get that in terms of opinion when so few people under 30 are willing to answer their phones? It doesn't matter what your demographics are when you're still restricted to the small number of people under 30 that are willing to answer their phones, making them outliers to begin with.
Their lists are millions of names long. It takes them a lot longer than it did 30 years ago, but they slog away at it until they get enough.
It's faster. They use more methods than just calling, but the calls can be automated and the data entry digitized. (I know there are restrictions on robodialing, but I'm sure surveys have an exemption or approval process.)
Nanos in Canada still does it the old way.
I would suggest that the fact that the polls are all over the map supports my point.
Please double check your voter registration! Even if you voted last year, you may have been purged from the system.
Go out and vote. Vote vote vote.
Please down your use of "up" as a verb. It ups my blood pressure and downs my tolerance of reading newspaper headlines.
It's a real downer. Now, time for these uppers!