this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
153 points (96.9% liked)

Games

32192 readers
1829 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

We need to start using this game as a unit to measure mismanagement.

"In total, the project cost us approximately .51 Star Citizens."

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] Mim@lemmy.zip 1 points 31 minutes ago

The amount of popcorn I ate because of this saga probably gained me a fair few pounds already.

[–] Nexy@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 2 hours ago

The good old Scam Citizen!

[–] absquatulate@lemmy.world 18 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Jesus christ. People need to realize that this is a scam. No video game is worth thousands of your dollars, especially a decade old game still in alpha.

[–] Evrala@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

It isn't a scam, just incredibly mismanaged. Chris Robert's has a very hard time saying "this is good enough" and that makes the company bleed money as they repeatedly remake things. People then don't tell Chris no. They weren't making a good space Sim, they were making the best darn space Sim evah! Their wages aren't great and now they are trying to push illegal levels of crunch time till they got caught.

They've completely redone the flight model several times to various levels of success. Time frames get so damm long that they have to go back and remake huge chunks of the game in order to keep things up to snuff graphically.

I get the feeling that they never felt the need to stress out about timelines as the funding kept rolling in, in fact the funding accelerated over time! The game has 183 different ships all designed down to the tiniest detail in the game right now. That's a fuck ton of work hours, but ship sales gets the funding rolling so they have to keep cranking out new ships.

I do really like playing the game, but it is really a shitshow for management. There was one point where they had to throw away a massive amount of work because one studio was making things that didn't fit the metrics for scale and animation of the rest of the game.

Edit: and ships are a dumb thing to buy anyway! You can earn them in game anyway for really not all that much work. It's the most cost inefficient grind skip I've ever seen in a game.

[–] finestnothing@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago

I got the game and some small ship bundle a year or two ago for like $20. It was a pretty fun game for the cost, but I honestly wouldn't pay more than $30 for it. It's buggy, runs like hot garbage even on my 3080 ti, and it's very much a mile wide inch deep content wise from what I remember

[–] Eric_Pollock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The episodic rollout of SQ42 is presumed to be a way to inject new cash into the studio alongside reported plans to release higher priced ships and the rumored third game.

What?... Higher priced ships? You've got to be joking...

One of my favorite ships in the game, the Drake Corsair, is already $250. It's a great all-rounder, but it's not even a large ship comparitively! And they're going to start charging more for the newer ships?!

They just released a new ship as well, the RSI Zeus MKII, which is yet another $175. And that doesn't even mention some of the larger ships like the Anvil Carrack, sitting at an insane $600, and the Origin 890 Jump at $950...

And if that's not bad enough, they've had concept ships for years available for purchase in the $1,500-$2,000 range. How can these ships get more expensive?

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 hours ago

Your numbers have a zero too much.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 53 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Star Citizen

"drying funds"

Have we checked to make sure they don't have a banana stand nearby? Specifically looked at the walls?

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 27 points 11 hours ago

What could a Star Citizen cost? Eight hundred million dollars?

[–] whereBeWaldo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

This game should be one of the most prominent examples of sunk cost fallacy

[–] bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 19 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Marketing and sales strategies are excellent for this game. It unifies in game purchases focused on whales like with mobile games and selling early access to an alpha. There’s also an aspect of collectibles and exclusivity like with NFTs. It‘s also cult like in many aspects. An utopian perfectionist vision evangelized by a prophet.

[–] magikmw@lemm.ee 2 points 8 hours ago

Everyone who bought in defending the practices is a perfect example of cultish behaviour and copium.

Heck, I bought in, but I only paid $20. And I never played a minute.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 17 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

They could’ve invested half of the funds in something else and never had to ask for another dime while keeping the game in perpetual development

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 72 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

It’s that that decade long grift disguised as a game?

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 54 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

I used to work with a guy who had thrown away upwards of $10,000 at this game. The last time it came up, he told me he had spent over $8,000, and that was several years ago and he didn't seem to be showing any signs of slowing down. When I asked him what he got for that money, he showed me the one ship he has. He had one ship. The rest were still in development and wouldn't even be released for years.

He spent more than some cars cost, for a handful of digital space ships, 90% of which aren't even finished. I have no idea how to reason with people who do this sort of thing.

Bloody hell, I spent a little over two dollars buying Elite: Dangerous (a similar space game) when it was on sale about five years ago and haven't spent any more money on it since. I can't even comprehend spending 10,000 dollars on an incomplete game.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 20 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

People like this get to piss away money while millions go homeless without a meal today.

I don't understand some people.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 16 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

These people have a mental illness. They’re being taken advantage of by unscrupulous companies. They’re in exactly the same boat as people with gambling addictions. We should feel bad for them, but not (always*) as bad as homeless folks, who are still worse off.

*One of my elementary school teachers was married to a gambling addict. The guy was secretly hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt and had stolen hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of heavy construction equipment to pay off some of his loans. The guy ended up in a police chase and took his own life before he could be arrested. His wife, the teacher, was left massively in debt (he had secretly remortgaged the family house to pay for gambling debts) and grieving the loss of her husband but also in shock at discovering the extent of his crimes and debts. Really awful situation and nothing but profits for the casinos!

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know.

Some people are defending things tooth and nail when trying to reason. Not only things like this either, might be something purchased or some ideology.

I have a really hard time emphasizing.

[–] kellyaster@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Did you mean "empathizing"? I'm having difficulty empathizing with cases like that too. I mean, ugh, it's mind-boggling, $10k is a life-changing amount of money for most people and this guy threw it away on a video game that's not even out yet. Still, people like him are being exploited for personal gain, and that is also wrong.

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Yes, I meant that, sorry and thanks (if nobody says anything it has the tendency to stick) . Typo and not native.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 8 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

And even if the game released and was great, what would you do if you already had everything in the game?

[–] Evrala@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

I have a bunch of ships in the game. The most fun I've ever had in the game was after a reset I ignored all of the other ships I had and just focused on starting with the cheapest ship in the game and earning my way up. I had a blast.

I haven't touched the game in probably 3 years, basically just waiting for more things to get finished before jumping back in. But it is hard to get excited for the game with how long it has been and how... not good things have been in the company.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 4 points 12 hours ago

that should be just the start, there should be something else to do beyond gathering everything you can. I hope they will add something like that.

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 47 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Seven hundred million dollars

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

More like 850 at this point

[–] magic_lobster_party@fedia.io 14 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Squadron “Feature Complete” 42

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Nothing says complete like a month of crunch for the demo

[–] Stanley_Pain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 17 hours ago

Any day now.

[–] stardust@lemmy.ca 10 points 16 hours ago

Same news all the time.