this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
520 points (96.9% liked)

Not The Onion

12187 readers
811 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 17 hours ago

So is the image in the article the porn version? Because that's hella tame. Oh is that just something they've commissioned which sort of gets the point across?

Remember kids! Jesus was best friends with a prostitute. This is in fact something God and Jesus would approve of....probably. If she's the kind of lady who's down with Jesus and only does stuff with other ladies when a guy is also involved, then I think Jesus and God would be cool with her.

[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

This was always going to happen.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is there any fanart of Vatican x Samsung?👀

[–] NastyNative@mander.xyz 2 points 19 hours ago

4 real what a horrible idea!

[–] SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago (2 children)

5 minutes after the Vatican presented her, there was already porn. Some say even earlier.

Rule 34: If it exists, there is porn of it. No exceptions.

[–] TastyWheat@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Knowing the Catholic Church, this is a chicken or the egg moment.

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Nah, the official girl figure came first. The porn version they had on hand was a boy.

[–] SoupBrick@yiffit.net 196 points 1 day ago
[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Googling “Luce porn” immediately surfaced sites where people are posting what appears to be handmade images of exactly that (click at your own risk), but searching Civitai specifically, a site which makes AI-generating porn of anyone and anything extremely easy, turned up the real motherlode.

I gotta say, the choice to write this article itself is questionable. It's obvious this stuff would exist to anyone familiar with the internet, but describing the images in lurid detail and saying exactly how to get them complete with direct links, kinda sus.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Backlog3231@reddthat.com 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That took longer than I expected.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Five minutes is longer than you expected?

[–] Xatolos@reddthat.com 2 points 12 hours ago

Maybe used to 30 seconds being average?

[–] Martineski@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Those came out as soon it was announced actually.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sircac@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago
[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works 60 points 1 day ago (65 children)

That mascot is a child. Please don't make porn of fictional children even if you disagree with the politics or religion of that fictional child you're making porn out of. Child porn is a bad thing

[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

It's a fucking drawing, who the fuck cares.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 109 points 1 day ago (3 children)

She is really a 2,000 year old ~~dragon~~ child of god so it's totally ok.

-some priest

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BlackLaZoR@fedia.io 26 points 1 day ago

Child porn is a bad thing

Tell that to the priests

[–] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 56 points 1 day ago (5 children)

If she's drawn as an adult like the pucture used for the pist I don't think it would be a problem anymore, you can't really lock down a fictional character's age it just comes down to features their drawn with and I guess if someone feels the need to go out of thier way to give an age

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 day ago (8 children)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (60 replies)
[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As soon as they announced it, people dove head first into that degeneracy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

Took longer than I expected.

load more comments
view more: next ›