this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
542 points (98.2% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9743 readers
763 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wpb@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

This is reason.com, famously a libertarian propaganda mill. Safe to completely ignore.

[–] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 3 hours ago

Now the 10 year old can do everything alone

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

More and more 70s-90s SNL skits are coming to life for real.

First one I remember was when the Gillette Track 2 twin-bladed razor came out. The ads showed an animation of how the first blade pulls the whisker out slightly, then the second blade cuts it off, allowing what's left to snap back below the skin for a super-close shave. SNL made a parody ad for a triple-bladed razor where the second blade pulls it out even more and the third one cuts it. The slogan was: "the new Track 3 - because you'll believe ANYTHING!" Within a year there were actual triple-bladed razors.

[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 21 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

When I was 10 i was told to be home when the street lights came on. Otherwise my parents rarely knew where I was. Kids these days aren’t going to be able to function independently when they grow up if they can’t even take a walk on their own.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

* Safety Warning * - You just said "Kids these days." The next step down that slippery slope is "Get off my lawn!"

This has been a public service from the Internet Safety Association.

[–] PagingDoctorLove@lemmy.world 18 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not saying this didn't happen, but I'm skeptical that it happened how it's being reported. It seems the only details are coming from the mother and her attorney, which is a red flag to me. It also sounds a lot like the self reported "discrimination" that some fundamentalist Christian influencer families have claimed, when they were indeed neglecting/abusing their children. In particular the Lott family (AmericanFamilyRoadTrip on socials) who live in a bus with their 8 children, don't get them medical attention unless forced, and recently got a "parents rights" attorney who sounded a lot like the attorney in this article.

I also find it odd that the sheriff of a town of less than 400 people would cause waves like this over an unfounded claim from a stranger. I'm curious to know what all this safety plan entails, because it could be a very reasonable plan and it's likely that DCFS just has to meet certain criteria before they can close the case.

Again, not saying it didn't happen, but the story seems like a good candidate for "missing reasons."

[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

the story seems like a good candidate for “missing reasons.”

Which is interesting as it's coming from reason.com

[–] PagingDoctorLove@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

There's another fundamentalist influencer family, a conservative wannabe Eminem and his disturbingly meek wife. They also have a gaggle of children and have been investigated by DCFS. Oh and then there's the family that Shaq buys stuff for all the time, and the one whose oldest son is in prison for possession of CSAM, and the family whose grandparents were literal Nazis.

These people all know each other, have all kinds of cronies, and spread all kinds of misinformation. I wouldn't put it past any of them to make a fake "news" website to back up their own claims, and name it something dumb like reason.com 😂

[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

As another commenter pointed out Reason magazine has been around for decades. It's a libertarian publication so I don't trust them to not push views a 14-year old would think is deep but any well-adjusted adult could see right through, but it isn't like they are some fly-by-night website.

[–] PagingDoctorLove@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Thank you for sharing, but now I'm even more suspicious. Libertarians aren't exactly known for their fact checking abilities, and I can't find this news story on websites that seem any more reputable.

[–] VerdantSporeSeasoning@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Reason.com is a publication that's been around for years, decidedly libertarian lean. No idea what that means for it in current political context. I used to see people from Reason on Bill Maher's show as non-Republican conservative-ish voices.

[–] PagingDoctorLove@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Hm, interesting, thanks for sharing. Libertarians and fundamentalist influencers have quite a bit of overlap in the ideologies, funny enough. I don't know how to feel about the Bill Maher tidbit though... I'm not his biggest fan, lol.

[–] LowtierComputer@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

This post and posts like this should be taken with a big grain of salt.

There's not enough information supplied.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

There’s not enough information supplied.

Business Insider has a substantial paywall version. It's an essay from Brittany Patterson read to a Jane Ridley, verified by Business Insider.

It's much more detailed and less flowery than Reason.

Mother of 4

Soren (tween in question) is homeschooled

Had to take another 1/4 to the doctor

Soren could not be found so they left him, they have 16 acres, she assumed he was outside

She took 1/4 to the doctor

Soren got bored and went to talk to a friend's grandmother that worked at a gas station, she wasn't there, he went to the Dollar Store, police brought him home.

Was stopped by a concerned neighbor, he ignored her and kept walking. She called the cops.

Deputy hauled her off, booked her and locked her up under arrest on a charge of wreckless conduct. Out on bail.

wreckless conduct: Daring or bold, but also irresponsible Willfully disregarding rules, norms, or social conventions Showing a lack of concern for consequences or potential harm to others

The deputy said it wasn't safe because it was a dangerous road. She said all kinds of things could have happened, including being kidnapped.

30 MPH road

Maybe he was doing something he REALLY shouldn't have been doing.

Maybe they had it out for her for truancy vs homeschooling

Maybe she REALLY pissed in the deputy's Wheaties,

Maybe it's not the first time?

Smalltown shenanigans, police overreach, nanny state neighbors are friends with the cops.

Take your pick; it might make a nice bingo card.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 21 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Damn, I used to walk home from the bus stop that was 1/2 mile away when I was in kindergarten. These people need to calm down.

[–] jacecomix@sh.itjust.works 15 points 11 hours ago

Some of these same people will complain about how kids these days don't play outside.

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 21 points 13 hours ago

Reported to police for walking less than a mile into town on a road that was 25 - 35 mph speed limit...

[–] pinkystew@reddthat.com 16 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I want jail to not be the default setting in this country.

Maybe she's a shitty parent, but that's something that can be worked on. She can be taught. It's not like she's some kind of soulless paycopath going from house to house traumatizing all the kids. There is absolutely no need to lock his person up.

And now that she's locked up, the kid has no parent at all. Does anyone really think this is the best solution?

I wish my people weren't so fucking lazy. Do the work. Figure something else out. Find out how to address this individual's needs without just waving your hand and saying, put her in jail and move on.

[–] BatmanAoD@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

For what it's worth, she was "quickly" released on bail (the article doesn't say how quickly), and the prosecution is not seeking further jail time but rather for the mom to sign a "safety plan" (although not signing could indeed lead to a year of jail time).

Your point is correct, but "the kid has no parent at all" isn't (currently) true.

[–] LANIK2000@lemmy.world 42 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Imagine getting jailed unless you ground your kids 24/7. Pretty sure that used to be a punishment for kids, not a requirement.

I know this is probably not possible if I still wish to use English online, but does anybody know how to filter out news specifically form America? It's becoming less and less relevant to my life as America is becoming more and more like Russia. It's like yea, I know, the people are literal fascists, any additional details are just depressing.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I had filtered loads of buzz words before I left reddit. Now going on without being signed in is nausea inducing. Block Trump & Elon for sure.

I always felt reddit needed a grouping mechanism. I never in my life want to see anything related to baseball on my feed but I would have to block every one of their teams to make it work. Same goes for anime or manga or hentai or whatever all those drawings are.

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 1 points 6 hours ago

For anime I just used to block all communities that stumble across my feed(those were like 10 or so).

[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago

Frack that Sheriff. Should lose her job, and they should investigate who called ?

[–] ViscloReader@lemmy.world 40 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

That would be admitting this country ain't safe enough for a child. Doomer world

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 5 points 13 hours ago

Something I'm noticing is the people who scream the loudest about the "what ifs" like rape and murder are often really fucking crazy themselves.

[–] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 25 points 19 hours ago

Yeah like as if God forbids any kids run around without being continuously tracked by Life360.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 60 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (5 children)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Adam_Walsh

This is what started this panic. A TV movie dramatization from 1983. At this point current parents largely weren't born yet so they don't even know how it started, they've just been raised into believing this is normal. It's not normal.

[–] CptEnder@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I think the real origins come from "do you know where you're children are?" PSA campaign during the Atlanta Child Murders in the 70s. My parents said they remember the whole country started locking their doors and were crazy about keeping their kids inside.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

So the PSA wasn't intended for that. It actually kind of only shows up late at night after most cities curfew and is supposed to be an anti-deliquency message, lol. The Atlanta Child murders are the other high profile case that happened right around Walsh's murder though. Both popped in the national news in around '81.

What's important about the Atlanta Child murders is they were ALSO dramatized in 1985 after the success of the Walsh dramatization( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Atlanta_Child_Murders_(miniseries)). It was even more sensationalized and was specifically designed to fuel the panic. That's why I consider the Walsh precursor really the watershed point. It was, however, gradual from the '60s as the news media really found out how to exploit it.

See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missing_children_panic for a more complete overview. You'll see this is also intimately linked to Reagan, the satanic panic, homophobia, and the political right.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 22 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

It’s also because most suburbs don’t have sidewalks and cycle paths and often lack safe crossings. Residential roads are so wide that drivers speed all the time. So kids have to be chauffeured around. Since they can’t even walk or cycle to school or soccer practice safely. That’s how it became the norm for kids to never go out alone. And people wonder why kids stay indoors all the time and play videogames or doom scroll on social media.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 230 points 1 day ago (19 children)

Dunno how I'd have gotten home from school or to soccer practice if I needed an adult, ffs I was staying alone overnight and cooking dinner for myself by 5th grade. How do you acquire independence and skills with someone hovering all the fucking time?

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 169 points 1 day ago (4 children)

we have infantalized children all the way through high school. no more open campuses, nothing. we live in a world where an 18 year old high school senior has to ask to use the restroom during the day, but could go to her night job as a porn star.

the main issue is parents suing school districts over any little thing, requiring them now to lock everyone down or else

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] adp1314@lemmy.world 98 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I started walking to school when I was eight. My parents made sure I knew the way and that was that. And on our bikes we went wayyy farther than a mile unsupervised

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 5 points 10 hours ago

My oldest (8) bikes to school nearly every day.

His younger brother is allowed to walk to school next year when he is 6.

It is fairly normal here for kids, that are above 6/7, to walk to and from school if it isn't too far.

[–] kiwicheese@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

Here we have 3 year old kids walking to kindergarten unsupervised.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 156 points 1 day ago (5 children)

"You're guilty of leaving your child alone, therefore we're taking you away from your child."

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›