this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
317 points (88.2% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

6335 readers
32 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm tired of guessing which country the author is from when they use cup measurement and how densely they put flour in it.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JaN0h4ck@feddit.org 1 points 18 hours ago
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

So go to Europe.

[–] razorwiregoatlick@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you bake regularly then this is a popular opinion. I generally won’t bother with a recipe that does not have the weights.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

But then you bake REALLY regularly, and you don't follow recipes anymore. I know exactly what the doughs and batters look like and how they pour. I know how adding sugar and water will loosen up the batter. I know exactly how the pizza flour should ocillate between the dough hook and the walls of the bowl.

It's like this bell curve of measuring

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago
  • 2 cups of flour
  • 1oz of water
  • 50g of salt
[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The only exception to this should be militers/liters. Because if you have to use, as example, 1l of milk, this would, if you want to be exact, be about 1.05kg

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 112 points 2 days ago (15 children)

i cant imagine this would be unpopular for anyone who actually bakes.

its so frustrating not having exact amounts for what is essentially chemistry.

[–] inconel@lemmy.ca 28 points 2 days ago (11 children)

I wanted to believe my opinion is popular yet recipes I've seen are almost in volume and I don't know why.

Baking is chemistry for sure.

[–] fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 days ago

My total guess is weighing scales used to be expensive / inaccessible for the common home baker and one of the first popular recipe books thus used volume, became wildly popular, and indirectly taught a generation of home bakers that baking recipes are by volume, not weight.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What, I'm supposed to use my kitchen scale for something other than cocaine?

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

A cup of cocaine please.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Scale, fancy. I just keep going until the feelings disappear.

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

You're doing it right. The scale is for selling not measuring doses.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 67 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (17 children)

Use non-American recipes.

The rest of the world does this. And guess what, 1 milliliter of water is exactly 1 gram, unlike stupid ounces.

[–] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If I want a recipe in English I always end the search query with "UK" to make sure it's in weight, not cups. I'm not a fucking toddler

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 24 points 2 days ago

Downvoted for popular opinion.

[–] redshoepastor@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago (13 children)

Just because no one in your life cares enough about your niche opinion to actually have an opinion does not make that an "unpopular opinion." When your opinion is the opinion of hobbyists, professionals, and elites alike, it's certain not unpopular, even if it is niche.

You're certainly right in your opinion, and that's the point of bitching at you.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 39 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This isn't unpopular.

Anyone who learns to bake quickly learns this.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] panicnow@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Cleanup is so much easier also. I don’t have to use a measuring spoon or cup for ingredients—I just dispense them into the bowl until I hit the correct number.

[–] NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Overshoot? Then what, scrape the flour out from the sugar?

[–] Mad_Punda@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago

I have done this many times. But I also got better at not overshooting.

[–] distantsounds@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You weigh ingredients in one bowl and pour into your mixing bowl. You still end up washing less

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

I am a proficient baker and I can get behind this.

[–] Geometrinen_Gepardi@sopuli.xyz 28 points 2 days ago (16 children)

Flour's ability to absorb water changes depending on what variety of wheat and where it was grown and what the weather was like during the season. Weight is also just a guideline. Baking is not an exact science.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

IMO anything sold by weight should be measured by weight in a recipe.

I could have an exception for things under 20g, which scales seem to get wrong a lot. I can do spoons, but not cups.

Also: Metric only. A tablespoon is anywhere from 13g to 20g depending on who you're talking to. A gram is always a gram.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 8 points 2 days ago (4 children)
[–] cheeseburger@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

454 ml! Because 1 gram of water is also 1 milliliter.

[–] Frostbeard@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Density of whole milk according to first google answer is 1,034g/cm^3.

It's been a while, but would that make it 438,68 ml?

Edit: But I totally agree with your statement. SI/ metric units is superior in every way with how easy it is to convert between them. At university in Norway I had American textbooks in all but one of my chemistry classes and all used SI/metric and proper names for the elements

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

1 gram of pure, distilled water at average gravity at sea level etc. but close enough.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, but in real units :P

I have one bowl and I just measure in all my wet by weight without dirtying a cup or spoon

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

3/32 Stones weight of water.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 12 points 2 days ago

yes. It's far easier to measure liquids by mass accurately

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Any recipe that gives me the ingredients in weight is my mortal enemy. Most sites I've been to now have a one click conversion for metric or Imperial

load more comments
view more: next ›