this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
525 points (80.9% liked)

People Twitter

5392 readers
2087 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 243 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (10 children)

Many people have reported this as a fake tweet. I don't have time to be the tweet police. What is everyone's thoughts about having a link to the actual tweet or other social media link?

Edit: Please stop reporting this. They may have re-posted this from somewhere else and didn't know or it might not be fake. I'm not going to x to find out. From now on, please provide an archived link to all politicians and major figures.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 81 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'm for it. This is like the 15th fake Elon Musk tweet I've seen today

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 60 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, but an archived link so tweet cannot be deleted.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 37 points 2 weeks ago

Good point, I'll change the sticky.

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I'm not the mod you're talking to, but I assume they aren't deleting it because OP posted it before providing a link was a rule, and it might not be a fake tweet. I mean it is fake, but I can't prove that.

Personally I'm in favor of mods erring on the side of not removing content if there's any uncertainty, even if it's a bit annoying seeing this fake tweet

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's misleading on the people Twitter sub. Fake Wikipedia articles hard to distinguish would be misleading on a Wikipedia sub

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago

It really feels like you didn't actually read what I wrote

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

This is the way.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 212 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

prolly the wrong climate to be openly admitting profits are more important than peoples lives.

[–] Krackalot@discuss.tchncs.de 98 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A real "let them eat cake" moment.

[–] 200ok@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I've heard that phrase my whole life and only looked it up now because of your comment. For anyone else that's curious:

"Let them eat cake" is the traditional translation of the French phrase "Qu'ils mangent de la brioche",[1] said to have been spoken in the 18th century by "a great princess" upon being told that the peasants had no bread.

...

The quote is taken to reflect either the princess's frivolous disregard for the starving peasants or her poor understanding of their plight.

~ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Let_them_eat_cake

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I had a history teacher who claimed that French bakers at the time called the layers of dough that were left on the bottom of the ovens and had to be scraped off periodically “cake” and that is what Marie Antoinette was referring to when she said “let them eat cake.” So it was just as heartless, but maybe less comically out of touch.

[–] Mora@pawb.social 13 points 2 weeks ago

The one sentence the poster you responded left out:

The phrase "let them eat cake" is conventionally attributed to Marie Antoinette, although there is no evidence that she ever uttered it, and it is now generally regarded as a journalistic cliché.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Someone might wanna "Deny, Defend, Depose" Musk. 😉

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 157 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I couldn't find this tweet on Elon Musk's Twitter feed

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 89 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Thank you for your sacrifice (of going to x).

[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 weeks ago

It was painful scrolling through his feed 😅

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Does that mean he deleted it, or it's fake? I don't know how Twitter works.

[–] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 96 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It's fake. It was posted on r/ToiletPaperUSA earlier today and clearly flaired as fake/satire.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ditto @ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] can@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago

Either is possible.

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 39 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I legit cannot tell anymore whether I'm reading satire or actual muskrat posts

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If it's any longer than the comment I'm leaving right now, it's fake. He is never this verbose

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 31 points 2 weeks ago

There’s been a bunch of Elon Musk tweets about this guy that are fake. But they’re all things he obviously believes.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Is there a list of healthcare company shareholders?

I guarantee you the companies will start freaking out once their largest shareholders start to be picked off and everyone else sells their shares.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

The largest shareholders tend to be retirement funds. It's generational warfare that no one realizes or talks about.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I would disagree that that is an example of generational warfare.
The older people get, the less of their money tends to be in actual stocks, and the shares managed by retirement funds are inevitably non-voting, so they can't even voice what tiny bit of opinion their fraction of ownership would theoretically get them.

The "shareholders" being performed for are the managers of those investment funds.
Making obscene wealth on stock investing is relatively rare, but making obscene wealth investing other people's money and then paying yourself an obscene salary out of the proceeds is far more common.
Those are the people who control the massive amounts of money that companies perform for to drive up share prices.

Why own when you can get paid to control? Then your money isn't on the line and you don't need to be lucky to get rich.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Market linked retirement funds, imo rank among one of the worst regressions in American governance/society.

It broke the employer:employee relationship where your work provides a pension, and you are secured in your old age for loyalty and time worked.

It directly enabled an emboldened a new group of parasites, who run hedge funds to gamble with other people’s money whilst skimming fees up and down the transaction flows. You win, I win - you loose, I win.

And those ‘smart people’ crash the economy every 10-15 years due to their collective greed and over leveraging in order to take the maximum profit they can - or society as a whole “lands softy” due to central banks fiscal policy via inflation, and we all see where that’s landed us.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)

"I was just following orders"

-said every nazi ever

[–] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago
[–] allo@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

edit: not finding this on elons twitter

[–] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Because it's not real. It's from reddit, specifically, r/ToiletPaperUSA where it was clearly flaired as fake/satire.

[–] LibreHans@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

If killing CEOs reduces their profits, maybe they should work on not having unpopular CEOs

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 13 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago

This is obviously fake. That's what other CEOs think, not Musk.

The only duty of CEO Musk is to himself!

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

???

Did he just condemn people for celebrating the killer and shitting on the killed and then went on providing the exact reason why people are celebrating? He forget to take his meth this morning or something?

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 10 points 2 weeks ago

So I'm watching Severance right now and it's incredible how spot on the corporate cult portrayal is in that show

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 weeks ago

the >80%+ that still use facebook using the laughing meme aren't "the radical left" if anything, facebook is a right leaning platform.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And this is a lie. There is no law about this there is no duty for it. I mean your company is tock might not be the greatest but that is another thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] schwim@lemm.ee 9 points 2 weeks ago

There doesn't seem to be any actual record of this being tweeted.

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 9 points 2 weeks ago

Is this real? I have no idea how to even access twitter anymore

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"We're forced to!"

Are you against that?

You spent a shitload of money, scheming to reshape American democracy. Was a single penny spent toward untying your tortured hands?

Do any of these assholes ever address this, as anything besides an excuse for their individual evils?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 6 points 2 weeks ago

It's not even the same jacket. Fucking boston bomber mkII

load more comments
view more: next ›