this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
483 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19243 readers
2285 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Texas Republican Valentina Gomez sparked outrage after releasing a video proposing public executions of undocumented immigrants who commit violent crimes, claiming it would act as a deterrent.

The video, shared on X, simulated Gomez shooting a hooded dummy representing an undocumented migrant.

Her comments followed the arrest of a Guatemalan immigrant for a subway murder in New York.

Known for far-right provocations, Gomez’s remarks drew sharp criticism from political figures and activists, with some praising her stance while others condemned it as hateful and extreme.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 4 points 25 minutes ago

NGL, that's a good looking meme setup.

Would be a shame if someone happen to put words like Luigi or healthcare CEO. Not saying what order though.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 42 minutes ago
[–] UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world 1 points 4 minutes ago

Of course they do.

Fully expected it

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 14 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

How about televised executions of politicians that do not do their elected jobs

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 6 points 58 minutes ago

I'm thinking televised executions of instance CEOs that do do their jobs

[–] Jericho_One@lemmy.world 22 points 2 hours ago

Shouldn't the headline be "Republican said something terrible to get the media talking about her, and we've done exactly what she wanted"?

[–] ben_dover@lemmy.ml 37 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

i'm proposing public executions of Nazi scum, cool?

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago

Make this law

[–] Demdaru@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Accepted!

Next week official definition of nazi changed to "Either left or right wing extremist not affiliated with federal goverment of USA" ^^

[–] ben_dover@lemmy.ml 1 points 43 minutes ago

then let's use "right-wing asshole who spits on the human rights of others" as the definition. the gallows- and guillotine industries will have a nice economic upswing

[–] terminally_offline@infosec.pub 7 points 2 hours ago
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

And if you call these people anything else than "moderate, christian-democratic, center-right, conservatives", you're being dramatic...

[–] vikingr@lemmy.world 13 points 3 hours ago

She hopes by showing her ass that the whites won't spend her as a token.

But they will.

Dumb fascist cunt.

[–] FiremanEdsRevenge@lemmy.world 43 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Wtf is up with these Hispanic nazis?

[–] kava@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

two major things to keep in mind

a) majority of hispanics in the US have been there multiple generations. while they may hold some varying level of ties to their family's home country, they've more or less been mostly americanized and are effectively just a different flavor of "american"

add in the fact that these are a more socially conservative people who more likely to be religious and it makes sense why they have been moving to the right. GOP could have taken advantage of this a long time ago. I think it's strange that Trump is the one to finally harness this group of people, but I guess reality is stranger than fiction

b) the US isn't stupid and it imports right-wing anti-left people. For example from Cuba or Venezuela. Miami has a massive Cuban population and they're all descendants from people fleeing the communist Castro regime. The Cubans are bred from birth to believe the Castro regime was evil and they're told all about the horrors (conveniently nobody remembers the just as brutal Batista regime, coincidentally supported by the US).

So all it takes is for there to be a connection between "democrats -> left wing -> communist" and all the Cubans turn against the DNC.

what I find fascinating is that you talk to a young Cuban who is one or two generations separated from Cuba, they have all sorts of horror stories and hatred for the Castro regime.

But you talk to an old-timer, someone in their 60s or 70s and they have nostalgia and nuanced views. Sort of like how people view the Soviet Union.

If we're gonna summarize all of this I'd just say this- assimilation. We're watching the process of how Irish went from "ethnic minority" to "white" and hispanics are going through a similar process

[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Sort of like how people view the Soviet Union.

I've never met anyone personally who speaks fondly of their time in the USSR. Tankies online who are too young to have lived through it are the only ones.

[–] kava@lemmy.world 1 points 19 minutes ago* (last edited 15 minutes ago)

There's that infamous quote from Putin- "Whoever does not miss the Soviet Union has no heart. Whoever wants it back has no brain"

People who actually grew up during the Soviet Union and went through the process of collapse and liberalization as an adult experienced quite a chaotic period of time. Your way of life was violently changed, the ideology you were taught disposed of, and you went through economic troubles. It's no wonder some look back fondly

I've seen similar statements from both Cubans and ex-Soviets. One of the main themes is how under liberal societies you are "addicted to money", so to speak. For example in Cuba, you could not get what you wanted. For example you go to the store one day, there's no shoes. Tomorrow, there's no batteries. You could not eat beef, you could not just leave. There were many restrictions.

But you were sort of guaranteed a certain minimum quality of life. You would have a place to live, you would have food. You would have a steady job without worrying about losing it.

Whereas in the US, you have an exponentially higher purchasing power- even the lowest segments of the population. But there's a catch. You have to be working all week to sustain that lifestyle. And the employer can more easily fire you- it's not as stable.

So they look back with nostalgia at what to them seems likes simpler and calmer times. Less stressful

anyhow, to back up my anecdotal experience with data: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2017/06/29/in-russia-nostalgia-for-soviet-union-and-positive-feelings-about-stalin/

78% of older Russians think collapse of Soviet Union was a bad thing. Majority of Russians view Stalin favorably.

It depends on the country you're from, but it's safe to say many older people have nostalgia and look back at the Soviet Union fondly. I've seen the same thing with Cubans

here's a thread on reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/esy6i5/russians_of_reddit_what_is_the_older_generations/

where people share their experiences. Few of the top comments basically mirror what I referenced above

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

I mean it might not be too relevant (as I know the majority of the Hispanics youre referring to aren't Spanish per se), but I'd like to remind people that Spain was a fascist dictatorship up until 1975, when it became a democracy.

I'm sure they at least produce media that's enjoyed in other Spanish speaking countries idk but nonetheless just a thought I had

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francoist_Spain

(It's really not related to the thing here the right wing propaganda Hispanics in America are being subjected to probably isn't from Francoist Spain

[–] AreaSIX@lemm.ee 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Spain didn't exactly just become a democracy after Franco's death in '75, things were very iffy well into the eighties, or at least until they joined NATO in '82. The military even attempted a coup in '81.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Thanks for the elaboration.

I just quoted a Wikipedia generalisation.

I'm not too well versed in Spanish history

[–] yournamehere@lemm.ee 7 points 5 hours ago

kinda stockholm syndroming. german christmas market attack was a saudia arabian refugee voting for the newer german Nazis "AfD" that also Space Karen likes.

so the dumbest of migrants seem to overcompensate their lack of identity.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 11 points 4 hours ago
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

🤦‍♂️ Of course she moved to Texas.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 15 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I wonder how Democrats will triangulate a compromise with this.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Being strung up with them, hopefully

[–] Catma@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

What if we just execute them but make it a Pay Per View event? We can raise money for helping out other immigrants

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Pelosi's portfolio suddenly has like a billion shares of whichever streaming service

[–] roserose56@lemmy.ca 11 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Are we talking about her? Who got 6th in the elections ? who even has this photo?

Image I just can't laugh.

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

When even the Department Of Justice publishes reports that more severe punishments, explicitly including death sentences, don't work for deterrence (see points 4 and 5 of their summary), people really should start thinking about better ways to prevent crime.

(Personally, I'd propose tackling the conditions that force crimes, particularly those of desperation, as well as reevaluating the catalogue of what really counts as crimes, particularly if there's no victim, but on here, I'd be preaching to the choir.)

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

tackling the conditions that force crimes, particularly those of desperation

aka corpos making less money, never happen

[–] kava@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

honestly i'm a little radical here. i think we should totally eliminate prisons

there should be two fundamental types of crimes

  1. ones that are forgivable and we deem the individual capable of rehabilitation

  2. ones that are unforgivable and we deem the individual incapable

in the 2nd case, we should just execute quickly and quietly. this should be reserved for the extreme cases. you know, those guys that chop up their parents and start eating their ears or the ones that abduct little girls for who knows what. what qualifies for this can be debated, i'm not surely exactly where we draw the line. for example should rape count? should a murder of passion count? i don't know

in the first case, we should take all the money we spend on prisons and instead focus it into rehabilitation programs. so for example let's say an addict is caught shoplifting. instead of hauling them off to prison, forcibly put them in a rehab center to detox. then put them in some sort of public housing and give them a job, give them free methadone, etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mercano@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Man, the headline is really leaving a critical criterion out to get more clicks, isn’t it? (I’m blaming Newsweek for this, not OP.)

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

They'd get fewer if you actually said what that was instead of alluding to it

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 39 points 12 hours ago

If I do this but it’s the CEO of a health insurance company, then I’ll get sued out the wazoo.

[–] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 38 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Luckily she's never been elected to anything so far.

She's a Colombian immigrant herself apparently and still has the accent so I'm not sure the racist crowd she's appealing to with this message is going to rally behind her as opposed to whatever other Republican is running.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 22 points 12 hours ago

How long until we find out that she or her family members are here illegally?

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 5 points 9 hours ago (2 children)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

widespread regurgitation of conservative views at disproportionate scales may imply manipulation by an unknown party.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 11 points 9 hours ago

Fucking hell... Many of those sound like they're either bots or from people who have been consuming too much content from bots.

[–] Dupree878@lemmy.world 53 points 15 hours ago

She’s one of the people Trump would deport just because of her name anyway

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 108 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

She not only thinks this, but took the time to plan this out. At no point while thinking about shooting immigrants, or building a dummy to represent an immigrant, or taping its arms and legs, or putting it in a chair, or loading the gun, or setting up a tripod to film it, or pulling the trigger, or loading it to a computer to edit it, or uploading it, did she think maybe this is a bit much.

Disgusting human trash.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

what will these pieces of turds not do for a grain political power?

[–] JayleneSlide@lemmy.world 20 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

I am sure if it was their only option they would do that too. they are just going for what they think sells

[–] Sciaphobia@lemm.ee 35 points 15 hours ago

Y'all Qaeda at it again.

load more comments
view more: next ›