this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2024
713 points (96.1% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35765 readers
902 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] schwim@lemm.ee 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I appreciate the warning as it readily admits the majority of the content is boring enough to make you want to scroll away.

[–] gndagreborn@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I LOVE engagement farming. I LOVE generating all that revenue and data to be mined for my precious share holders who I owe my LIFE to.

[–] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

SoUNd oN

Not clicking that either

Always some annoying bullshit at the end

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 67 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Even worse is captions saying what happens. Like it'll be a video of a baby trying to sit on a chair and missing and falling...and the caption will say "bro missed his chair".

Why does a 7 second video need spoilers?

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago

That’s up there with the overlay of the “creator” pointing at the spoiler text, needlessly obscuring the actual content.

[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's the attention span shrinking as time goes by.

I have a brilliant idea actually; a video sharing site with a maximum video length of one second. "How much can you fit in a second? Find out for only $10/month"

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That just made me miss Vine and early Twitter... Attention span be damned, there's an art to crafting a good joke with a length constraint that I don't see much on the internet anymore

[–] rhythmisaprancer@moist.catsweat.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

there's an art to crafting a good joke with a length constraint

RIP Mitch Hedberg

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah. Those platforms were the one-liners of social media comedy. 7 seconds/140 characters to set up and deliver a punch line.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Bill Gates, Zuccerberg and Elon Musk wants to know your address.

It's six times better than vine!

[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The worst is people verbally explaining what you're seeing like a fucking documentary. It's extra bad because they stole the video they're narrating.

Even better is a split screen video where the bottom half is someone playing Minecraft or some really simple platform game because people don't have the attention span to learn some dumb fact without also watching some game on half of their screen.

I really hate this version of the internet.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Even better is a split screen video where the bottom half is someone playing Minecraft or some really simple platform game because people don't have the attention span to learn some dumb fact without also watching some game on half of their screen.

I've never seen those in any of my feeds, thankfully. Probably because I tend to watch longer videos and..."original" videos (no overlayed people or other stuff)

[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Same, but once in a while I start watching a short from one of my subscriptions and then start scrolling. I guess because I watch some gaming content, YouTube thinks I want to watch that drivel.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I watch a lot of gaming content, but it's mostly video essay or review style stuff. Maybe that's what keeps my feed clean.

On YouTube, I don't watch shorts at all though. And I'm vicious about telling it "Not Interested" when there's something I don't want in my feed.

[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It's not my feed that has crap. Try swiping up on 100 shorts some night when you can't sleep and see what you see.

[–] Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 54 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I did X and this happened!

Also, if the title of a news article is in the form of a question I just mutter to myself "no" and keep scrolling without even reading it.

[–] TurtleTourParty@midwest.social 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Which then becomes a way to influence opinion.

Can Obama Really Reform Healthcare?

Is Trump's Infrastructure Week Here?

Can Biden Make EVs Work?

The answer should be Fuck You, I'll go read a different source on this topic.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

THIS GUY JUST...

Tell me who "this guy" is. You have their username. Don't anonymize them.

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"watch until the end"

Yeah, that's how videos work.

Nah, I like to close my eyes at the penultimate second of any video I would otherwise have watched to the end. Just to be difficult.

[–] LostXOR@fedia.io 33 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Especially when the video is only 15 seconds long. Has the average attention span really fallen so far that one can't wait like 10 seconds for the funny part? (The answer is yes, I know, I've seen kids scrolling through TikTok and skipping a video after just a second or two).

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Wait for the end" or "the last one will shock you" is because the video gets an algorithm bump if people watch it all the way to the end. Only reason. To make more money.

[–] MellowYellow13@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yes but you dont have to say "watch till the end," as it makes people literally not want to do that

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 1 points 14 hours ago

And would be easy for the algo to detect -- if it says wait, take away credit.

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

It should, they are not giving any proper reason to, just trying to cheaply get more money from you wasting more of your time. They are wrong, they should feel bad. Making a video with the express purpose of trying to milk money out of it is not a successful strategy long-term. Making good content that people want to watch to the end without being told to is much harder, but actually works.

Read the first sentence and gave up sorry. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

How much is impatient people and how much is the content creator not understanding how to do a hook at the beginning?

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Have you ever considered that those kids already saw the video and don't want to watch again?

[–] lukewarm_ozone@lemmy.today 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Have you considered just not watching shortform video like tiktoks and youtube shorts?

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I've never even heard that line in anything I watch. If I see thumbnail faces, I instantly block the whole channel.

Yup! That's in fact what I myself don't do.

I cross posted this post from another to MildlyInfuriating because it's the kind of content this community is for. Not because I myself was soliciting advice.

[–] Fluffy_Ruffs@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

If it's interesting I'll watch until the end. It's that simple. If you feel the need to tell me how to get through a 30-second video I'm going to assume it's not worth my time and that's the only way you can get me to stick around.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The clickbait will continue until it stops working.

I Dare you to watch this entire video! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Edx9D2yaOGs

Challenge not accepted! 💪

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Like if you watched to the end and you will have seven years of good luck.

[–] scops@reddthat.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is this some New Social Media platform problem I'm too elder millenial to understand?

It's like the TikTok equivalent of YouTube clickbait titles and thumbnails. I don't even use TikTok, but I can hear the stilted AI lady voiceover saying, "Wait Until The End. You Won't Believe The Transformation."

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Longer engagement times on videos are rewarded with higher priority in the Feed and more advertising revenues.

These videos are responding to the economic incentives created by the social media industry. Nothing you - personally - do will change this because you - personally aren't the target audience.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

till

If they could please just spell the word correctly, that'd be great.

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/till

Googled it for you so you can be less wrong next time

[–] Odo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

"Till" and "until" are separate words despite having the same meaning. This meaning of "till" is actually the older word.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 day ago

But no, you don't understand, LaNgUaGeS cHaNgE oVeR tImE