this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2024
96 points (96.2% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27277 readers
1903 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'd like to see just how horrible someone can make a site. Facebook is a good contender.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Comcast. I dare you to try to cancel or change your cable and internet package.

[–] Battle_Masker@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

Publisher's Clearing House.

So this company has ads on local free tv stations in the US about how you could win $5000 a week for life, but when you go to the website it's like 97% ads and maybe 2% contests, and some contests are straight up unenterable if you have an adblocker. Then before you can officially enter, you have to go through 3 pages of 'as seen on tv' crap that it tries to sell you before you can finish entering. Also it lags like a motherfucker with or without an adblocker, cause there's so many ads taking up that much bandwith, cause heaven forbid a webpage ad be a static image. And of course you have to have an account, so your spam folder and paper mailbox fill up with the worst things possible.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 hours ago

Usually webapps.

[–] elephantium@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago

It's hard to pick out one as THE worst, but generally, if I have to use the site for some external reason, the experience is awful.

Health insurance, doctor's offices, etc are generally pretty bad. Oddly, tax sites aren't as rough.

Also oddly, vacation related websites are awful.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 10 points 6 hours ago

literally any restaurant website. I disabled Facebook from my entire network (pihole).

I can no longer order food on a website because Facebook is deadzoned.

Also, about half of big box brick and mortar online stores stopped working as well.

[–] GhostTheToast@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago

Spotify. Only website/service that makes their service intentionally worst and people still pay for it

[–] 1hitsong@lemmy.ml 43 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Seemingly every recipe website. They tell a long, unrelated story, cover the page with ads, popups, slideouts, timer triggered ads, videos, etc.

It's almost impossible to see the recipe under all the crap.

[–] Shard@lemmy.world 17 points 15 hours ago

These were some of the first sites to be enshittified. The more you scroll that more ad revenue they got. So they hid the actual recipes and steps under a back story longer than the dune books that forced you to scroll and hit ad after ad.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 24 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

4chan. When I saw a German shepherd get hit in the face with a shovel full force, I decided the site wasn't for me.

[–] Sir_Premiumhengst@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Ya no. That's when I quit too. That place's ~~hollow~~ got no humanity left.

It was like 20 years ago when I saw it. It never really had any humanity.

[–] Naughty_not_bad@lemmynsfw.com 43 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Try using Instagram without an account and no app, basically impossible.

[–] anothermember@lemmy.zip 12 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The only way I've worked out how to even save Instagram images locally is using the page information (ctrl+i) Media tab in Firefox and sort through it to find it there. Terrible for an image hosting website.

[–] hogmomma@lemmy.world 23 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

It's not an image hosting site, it's a social media site whose goal is to keep you coming back for more. The easier it is for you to save their content locally, the less likely you are to spend as much time on their site.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 78 points 23 hours ago (5 children)

Pintrest is the worst website ever built and has caused immense damage to the free sharing of information.

[–] Battle_Masker@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

me: oh hey I was looking for--

Pinterest: Sign in or I will come to your house and break your thumbs

me: well fuck you too then

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 48 points 23 hours ago

Together with Quora. Search engine pollution.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 17 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I legitimately don't know why Google hasn't filtered it out of image search results. It's harmful to Google's platform.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

It's the top rated blocked website on Kagi.

I don't know why Google doesn't take a hint.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

This is a baseless but very reasonable theory - because Pinterest pays them a fuck ton of money.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Nyxicas@kbin.melroy.org 25 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Reddit.

Fragile Mods. Shitty trolls. Dishonest engagements. Little to no good discussion. Opinions are seen as attacks. Power-tripping users and mods alike. Karma whores.

[–] Prime_Minister_Keyes@lemm.ee 1 points 5 hours ago

Can't stand the staleness. Apart from the frigging bots and automods, it feels like a bunch of boring, shallow, sated establishment guys that like "pretending that one could be hip with a mortgage payment," as Bela Koe-Krompecher once put it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HootinNHollerin@slrpnk.net 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

I only know of this site because a friend submitted one he called “The Tempest”

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 21 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Ogrish.

Doesn't exist any more, but definitely traumatized me as a child.

If you haven't heard of it, it was basically a video hosting site focusing on extreme violence and gore.

Tons of clips of people being killed or horrifically maimed in war, car accidents, industrial accidents, 'extreme' magic shows gone wrong, brutal gang attacks, straight up snuff videos...

Some videos off the top of my head I won't ever be able to erase from my memory:

The beheading of Daniel Pearl.

Low resolution video of 9/11, but you could make out people jumping from the towers... and splattering all over the ground. The camera man tracked people the entire distance they fell.

Some insane magic show gone wrong where a man chain sawed his wife in half ... she hadn't managed to fold herself into the right position inside the magic box... her screams and twitching legs were not an act.

A video taken in Fallujah (I think?) of an Iraqi hopped up on an absurd amount of drugs, taken from a US soldier who had just dismounted with most of his squad from a humvee.

Him and others advance down the middle of a street towards the soldiers, all holding AKs. A volley of fire from the dismounted soildiers either took out all the group, leaving them with chunks blown off, writhing in agony, or scattering...

Except this one guy. He's clearly seriously wounded, but is still advancing basically blind firing his AK.

The US soldiers are in shock that he's still walking.

Now for a burst from a 50 cal.

Huge parts of this guy's body are visibly blown off of him, but he still advances.

A second, more sustained 50 cal burst basically liquifies him where he stood.

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 19 points 20 hours ago (6 children)

That and rotten.com have been responsible for a lot of my insomnia, and probably a good chunk of my misanthropy.

You can't unsee things, folks. Don't give in to the temptation. It's not worth it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] squirrel@discuss.tchncs.de 76 points 1 day ago
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 28 points 22 hours ago

ticketmaster.com

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 29 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I thought Twitter was a stupid idea when it first started. 140 character limit? What the fuck is the point? The fact they increased that limit shows it was dumb. Everything else about the site just gives further reason to hate it.

[–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 18 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

That limit came from the days of SMS. The idea was that you can't go to the internet, because data is expensive, the network doesn't exist, your dumb phone can't even open websites etc. However, you can send SMS messages, and those things have a 160 character limit.

[–] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Do does that mean they took an existing limitation from the SMS protocol, that didn't apply because it used data instead and then shoehorned it into a godawful web 2.0 monstrosity all the same (and bear in mind, this is significantly reducing the unnecessary character limit!)

[–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 11 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

In 2006 the restriction did apply. The idea was that you would type the message on a computer, and let Twitter send a few SMS messages to a small group people.

You weren’t supposed to have millions of followers or write a full length blog post using a hundred short messages. The idea was that you cold reach people quickly even though they didn’t have access to a proper computer or the internet. So much has changed in the past 18 years…

[–] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

So wait, it would convert them into an SMS for you?

Why bother with the middle man...

[–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 8 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Back in the bad old days, messages cost you real world money. If you wanted to reach lots of people by SMS, it would be pretty expensive. Might as well let Twitter pay for the messages, especially when you’re just writing a public announcement.

[–] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Still does where I'm from! As to why they front up for the 18 cents (or similar), seems mental

[–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 3 points 8 hours ago

I’ve heard some strange stories about a mysterious land on the other side of a vast ocean. In this far-away land of countless wonders, companies are only symbolically restricted by laws. This means that they can legally exploit their employees and customers in all sorts of creative ways, and charge pretty much whatever they want. Maybe you’ve heard similar wonderful tales as well?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Boozilla@sh.itjust.works 14 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Nextdoor has gotta be in the top 10.

[–] hactar42@lemmy.ml 13 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It is amazing how toxic people on that site are. Especially when you consider it's not anonymous and the people are literally in your neighborhood

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›