this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
79 points (85.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

30307 readers
683 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted, clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts: 1

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
    • If you feel strongly that you want politics back, please volunteer as a mod.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They might also be meaningless internet points. Who knows.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zugyuk@lemmy.world 11 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

What if we could trade in our Internet points for some sick cosmetics 🀣

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 2 points 58 minutes ago* (last edited 58 minutes ago)

My profile already looks amazing, no need for mtx.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Honestly, that way for obtaining flair and shit would be preferable to spending actual money. Especially if I could turn them in for a physical Lemmy shirt to wear IRL.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago

We all know that decorating your in-game character with cosmetics is the true endgame.

[–] Zero22xx@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

They're really not meaningless though. For one thing, they allow moderators and admins to more easily detect trolls and bad faith actors. And on platforms or with add-ons that allow better tracking of vote history, it allows the user to more efficiently moderate their own experience, should they so choose.

Also, I think you've got to be kind of an asshole to not recognise that a little bit of validation from communities that you participate in is a nice thing to have and that downvotes can hurt to an extent, even if it's not the same as getting physically slapped. And to be clear, I'm not pointing at you or anyone, I'm just riffing here. I haven't even seen downvotes for a while now.

So yeah, I'd say they're meaningless in a video game sense. You're not going to win any prizes with them. But there's a reason they exist, plus no one is immune to the effects of positive or negative reinforcement.

[–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago

I agree. At the very least they say "this many people liked what you said or posted enough to click this button", and that is far from meaningless.

[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

When I first got on Lemmy, there were a bunch of discussions about getting rid of downvotes, and I thought this was a bad idea. For the most part, they do a good job of allowing the communities to self-moderate. Sure there are trolls that downvote everything, and they can rot in Hell, but they’re a very small majority. Generally speaking, up/downvotes provide an easy way to sort the wheat from the chaff in both posts and comments.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

remember the heated discussions about the "proper" use of downvotes?

iirc there was a bloc of users who were very adamant that downvotes only be used for indicating the comment in question failed to adhere to the 1964 Chicago Manual of Style regarding commas or something, but everybody else was using it to say "don't like it" and they were super-cheesed.

[–] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Personally:

Upvote = I like it or it contributes well to discourse

Downvote = repeated trolling (first comment gets a pass, as do unpopular opinions, but doubling down on unambiguous and apolitical truths doesn't), spam, scams, etc.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Sure, that makes sense.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 hours ago

To me, voting is mostly a sorting tool.

I may upvote to make sure a great comment is higher than the good comments around it. I may even disagree with the comment to some extent, but I'm still going to upvote, because I think it adds something important to the conversation and more people should read it. However, there are also situations when I upvote to show my approval.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 hours ago

There are also trolls who constantly say controversial things. Looking at the downvote counter tells you something.

There are also people who... I don't really know what's going in the head of a person who intentionally insult everyone they come across. Did a nefarious little brother hijack that account or is that person really trying get some achievement about maxing out the downvote counter? Some people are a complete mystery. Either way, the downvote counter serves as a red flag.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 5 points 12 hours ago

I thought about that too. If they were completely meaningless then why would they be used for sorting purposes. Turns out, they do mean something and they can be used for something.

[–] gi1242@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I don't even know you have points on Lemmy. how do I check them

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)
[–] Zero22xx@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 12 hours ago

All depends on which app / UI you're using I guess but it should look pretty much like Reddit almost everywhere. The only difference here is that there's no grand total at the top of your profile like a high score. But when I was signed up on world, in the app I'm using you could see separate up and down vote counts for everything.

[–] DragonsInARoom@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

I love internet points they make me feel good

[–] CorrodedCranium@leminal.space 27 points 15 hours ago (5 children)

I hope Lemmy's internet points never become a thing people view as important. The way people act on Reddit to get a handful of up votes is embarrassing.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 11 points 13 hours ago (2 children)
[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 5 points 12 hours ago

You have many.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 19 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

I just disable "show votes" in settings and that's it.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 5 points 12 hours ago

Ooh, so they can also be invisible internet points.

[–] imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works 6 points 13 hours ago

That just blew my mind, I didn't even realize that was a setting.

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Lemmy.world users can't unfortunately (it arrived in 0.19.4 IIRC)

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Wait wait, global karma is a thing now…? If so: not a good change. I thought it was a great idea to omit that, tbh.

[–] hypna@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I've been thinking recently that Lemmy would simply be better off without any comment votes. I've heard some instances disable them, but it still seems to be the norm. Group think already has enough pull given human nature. It doesn't need a boost.

I mean I don’t think showing votes on posts and comments is inherently bad… but aggregating them to a user across instances seems not only technically challenging from a protocol sense (given that (de)federation and blacklisting is entirely in the control of the server admin), but also a feature that should be intentionally omitted. It’s genuinely not a useful metric in terms of building communities, which I think the lemmy stack should (and does) consider to be an essentially overriding priority.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 11 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I've been able to exchange some of my points in the Lemmy Store for a rub on tattoo.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] donuts@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

And we should keep it that way. As soon as you can derive value from your profile karma and/or it means something, it'll break any sense of earnest discussion some are trying to have in the first place.

Look at Reddit: any serious thread is peppered with might-be-funny one-liners in the hopes of catching some upvotes. This makes those threads harder to read through, although it does make for funny AI summary results.

It's not just off topic banter to increase karma though. It's also reposting old memes, jokes and stories that did well in the past to farm that sweet karma. Throw in some copied top-level comments too and some subreddits are basically perpetually living in dΓ©jΓ  vu.

Let's not try to aim for that.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Some of that could be karma grinding, but for the most part, that is probably just people having fun. Many come to social media platforms for recreational purposes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheFrogThatFlies@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

But it is incredible the power those points have in our mind! Just now I'm being downvoted for a comment I did and I immediately felt the need to go there and justify the point I was trying to make. It took some effort to convince myself that I don't care about that and that I don't have to justify to those that didn't understand my point.

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Since 0.19.4 you can hide downvotes in your settings. Unfortunately LW still runs 0.19.3

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

if you're using Voyager it's a setting you can change to just show upvotes.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 hours ago

Must confess, those points do seem to wield some strange power over my mind. Kinda scary actually. Some people have disabled those numbers entirely, and I’m beginning to see why.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 11 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

I'll sell you mine. Hell, I might even trade some points for a block of your finest cheese.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

I'm afraid we're fresh out of red leicester sir, it's been on order for two weeks.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Even more fake here because you can turn off down votes

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CorrodedCranium@leminal.space 10 points 15 hours ago

For those that don't know this is in reference to Reddit's process of "vote fuzzing". Most explanations online explain it as altering the votes to prevent things like rigging the vote or an individual going to someone else's page and down voting everything they've posted or commented. I think in reality it's more obtuse and erratic. I don't know if the level of "fuzz" varies based off the age of the post or the total number of votes.

[–] StudChud@aussie.zone 4 points 13 hours ago

If we don't have fake internet points, then how will we know what to think? Won't somebody think of the pointsβ€½ 😭

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Whoever has the most points on Lemmy has to read the credits in a style of Clive Anderson's choosing.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Whomever gets the most votes per month has to pay a share of the instance bill for the month

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί