We got senator musk now? 🤣
this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
345 points (94.6% liked)
politics
21792 readers
4404 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Yeah that got me too!
What a misleading and poorly written headline.
I've never heard of the site Mediaite before. I didn't click the link, but plenty of AI slop sites are popping up and headlines like this are a good way to spot them.
EDIT: apparently the sites been around for a bit, and this seems to be a one off headline issue. The credited writer appears to have several articles without issues apparent at first glance. Another article says "White House attorney" but it's an attorney that's acting as a liaison. Maybe just a nitpick. Some sensationalist headlines. Same as I've seen elsewhere so nothing too egregious.
Mediaite has been around for 15 years https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mediaite
Thank you for the link! Will edit my comment to reflect it's not new. It seems there's some question as to its journalistic merit with the wiki stating "The New York Times has described the site as "a blog that chronicles the gossipy media world"", but it seems it's been around for a bit at least.
Its owned by Daniel Abrams, the guy who created Live PD and its spiritual successor, On Patrol: Live.
Such a strange sentence. Makes you "garden path" (reanalyze the syntax after already being deeper into the structure). Minimally need a "that" after "Senator".
Though it's uncommon usage, so that's actually a tick against it potentially being AI generated.
need a "that" after "Senator".
You mean 'who', right? Senators are (usually bad) people so let's not treat them like objects.
"That" or "who" are both commonly used for animate arguments. And given it is an object here, "whom" would be the most pretentious option.
Wait, I read the article and the headline is pretty much on point? What am I missing?
"Senator Elon Musk" is ambiguous phrasing. Obviously, what is meant is "Senator [that] Elon Musk", but it could also have been calling Aparthiedman himself a senator.
It reads like a gardenpath sentence.
For example (made up on the spot so excuse me if its crap)
Muscle man made harms others when using force
[Muscle that was made by man]
I like "The old man the ship"
Elon Musk isn't a Senator. The title as written reads that way by default.
A that shoved in the middle would fix that.
Senator Elon Musk Called a ‘Traitor’ Gets Rid of His Tesla: Don’t Want a Car Built By An ‘A**hole’
This sounds like Elon is a Senator and was called a traitor; when it was actually Musk calling a Senator a traitor.
Try:
Senator, who was called a 'Traitor' by Elon Musk, Gets Rid of His Tesla: Don’t Want a Car Built By An ‘A**hole’
Can't read with adblocker.
Poor grammar aside, the headline is inaccurate. I am all in favor of people dumping Teslas, but Musk neither designed nor built any of them. He paid people to design them, then he paid people to build them. And by all accounts, he did not pay them well or treat them kindly.
He designed that cybertruck. Or maybe his son did.
Wait, you’re telling me he was not the chief engineer of space x whole simultaneously being the world champion at a video game?
He seems to only have one actual skill, but to be fair, being born rich is very difficult to master.
Unfortunately, I don't think there is a way to edit the title, but I think this article would have been clearer with a comma. I'm going to leave it up, but sticky this here with a clearer title: "[The] Senator [Who] Elon Musk Called a 'Traitor' Gets Rid of His Tesla: Don't Want a Car Built By an 'A**hole'."
Titles can absolutely be edited in Lemmy.
The user who submitted it could fix it, but I don't think the mod can.
I did not buy a Tesla today and am thus in violation of the law.
Musk is the president, not a senator. What a misleading headline.
The.
THE Senator...
Three letters, you couldn't spare THREE FUCKING LETTERS?
When these publication headline writers pass-on I hope the undertaker hideously abbreviates their tombstones!
Dude I had to read the post headline like 4 times to figure that out. It was so confusing. At first I was like "shouldn't this say copresident Elon Musk?"
Senator? The fuck?
This would make more sense: Senator Who Was Called a 'Traitor' by Elon Musk Gets Rid of His Tesla: Don’t Want a Car Built By An ‘Asshole’
Also, it's Mark Kelly
Edit: fixed who called who what
Thank you for your service.
The title gave me a headache.
Two additional words to the title make it easier to read.
THE Senator THAT Elon Musk called a “traitor” gets rid of his Tesla.
Can also replace that with who I reckon. Or whom? Where’s the grammar nazis when you need them. Oof they’re going to have to rebrand aren’t they since real nazis are back!
Also I hate title case. Why is it a thing?
Words to live by.
This is the actual content link https://xcancel.com/CaptMarkKelly/status/1900574148906086817
Damn those replies are nasty.