this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
344 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38308 readers
712 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Please more!!!!!!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

it is still overvalued anyway. they havent shown the profitability and growth potential that its current price reflects, not even after plunging as much as it did.

[–] HappyTimeHarry@lemm.ee 4 points 5 hours ago

tsla stock price was around $230 when musky used it as collateral for whatever loans he took out for the purchase.

[–] TanyaJLaird@beehaw.org 10 points 11 hours ago

Drop that fucker til it's in the ground.

[–] 68silver@beehaw.org 4 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

And yet Musk is fixing NASA's screwup today by rescuing people.

[–] PeteZa@lemm.ee 5 points 6 hours ago

Sure, like he’s “fixing” the government?

[–] Vodulas@beehaw.org 17 points 9 hours ago

You mean Boeing's screw up. They were the designer/manufacturer of the capsule that had issues. Plus Musk has very little if anything to do with SpaceX engineering or operations (Gwynn Shotwell is in charge of operations). Mostly he just does "Funny" shit like telling engineers to make Starship more pointy.

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 14 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

Aand still +30% from year ago.

Is "Tesla is going bankrupt" then new "Putin has cancer"?

[–] PeteZa@lemm.ee 5 points 5 hours ago

Trump apparently tried claiming it’s illegal to boycott Tesla. They’re most likely not happy about it lol

[–] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.funami.tech 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The entire stock market is likely overvalued by 25% or so. This is a regression to the mean, accelerated by the fact that Musk no longer seems to care whether Tesla is successful or not. Probably because he sucked out all the money via that incentive package the board approved a few months ago.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The pay was in stock options. It essentially doubled his ownership of Tesla from 12% to 25% so he in fact cares a lot about the price.

The stockholders are definitely morons for agreeing to it. Pay the fashgeld and you never get rid of the fash.

[–] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.funami.tech 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't know that, thank you! Also apparently a judge has blocked the awarding of the package?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Yes, we'll see if it sticks. The prior argument was that Elon effectively controlled the board, and when he convinced the shareholders to vote in favor as well he lied/threatened them and invalidated it. This is just cynicism but I wouldn't particularly expect that to stick, but who knows?

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago

If your erection lasts for more than 1h, see a medical professional or stop watching the Tesla stock prices

[–] pineapplepizza@lemm.ee 61 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Too big to fail. Prepare for gov bailouts.

[–] sanzky@beehaw.org 52 points 1 day ago (1 children)

they have only survived so far because hype and government money. they have never been profitable. the stock could halve again and it would still be overvalued

[–] Reil@beehaw.org 15 points 1 day ago

It's like 20x too high as it stands going by p/e ratios compared to the rest of the auto industry. Like 5-6x too big compared to tech companies. It's wild.

[–] sqgl@beehaw.org 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The stocks are merely at pre-election levels and look like they have now stabilized unfortunately.

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Down 5% today, not super stable. Could have been a dead cat bounce last week.

[–] sqgl@beehaw.org 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The instability is great for inside traders eg those who knew about the Whitehouse lawn stunt in advance. That was not a dead cat bounce, it was the stunt.

But the trend since the stunt has been stable enough.

I certainly will be looking at the graph each day rather than reading articles describing it.

Reminds me of how people laugh at the yo-yo tariffs, totally ignoring how insider trader buddies of Trump must love it. Is an overall economic decline going to bother them in comparison?

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 57 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's illegal! TSLA is not allowed to drop. Prepare for your mandatory stock purchase, citizen.

[–] makuus@pawb.social 15 points 1 day ago

You jest, but I would seriously consider the possibility that he’ll sue anyone selling the stock, and sue the government for not investing in it expressly.

I mean, god, the tantrums he’s thrown at having advertisers take breaks—because I don’t think any of them truly left—from Twitter should be proof enough of the possibility.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 3 points 23 hours ago

And then the citizens will own a chunk of Tesla? And we will see our investment pay off when it does well?

Pretend I made that into padme/anakin meme.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 day ago

To the floor!

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 28 points 1 day ago

Let’s go for ten weeks! Then twenty!

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At the end of the day, there are actually better electric cars now for the price. Even starlink is starting to get major market competition for cheaper.

[–] remington@beehaw.org 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Even starlink is starting to get major market competition for cheaper.

Please elaborate.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Everyone and their dog wants to gunk up LEO with their soon-to-end-space-flight-forever space junk

[–] psud@aussie.zone 3 points 19 hours ago

Ok, so list the ones I can buy today

[–] Byter@lemmy.one 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Objects in LEO fall quickly (months to single-digit years) without station-keeping, mostly from atmospheric drag. Anything we put there wouldn't contribute to a long-term Kessler Syndrome situation. It's geosynchronous Earth orbit (GEO) we have to worry about, but once you're up that high there's a lot more room for everything.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 4 points 12 hours ago

Kessler syndrome is specifically about LEO, and the damage done by debris from collissions, though. Like, that was Kessler's whole thing.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

One study suggested all that burn up is bad for the ozone letter though

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also introduces small amounts of bad metals in the air. It's one of the reasons wooden satellites are starting to be sent up.

[–] Jayjader@jlai.lu 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Doo you happen to have a good, informative link? Or perhaps a company name I could look up?

This sounds incredibly cool.

[–] ivanovsky@lemm.ee 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Disclaimer: I'm stock illiterate. Are his other companies also trending down? Or are they not publicly traded or whatever? Is it known what % of his wealth comes from Tesla (vs Starlink or SpaceX)?

[–] jansk@beehaw.org 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Most of his other companies are not publicly traded, so there isn't much direct comparison. But Tesla has widely been known to be hugely over-inflated for years and years now, the bubble had to burst sooner or later. It is definitely being hit harder than the rest.

[–] Banzai51@midwest.social 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Tesla was overinflated because it was run as a software startup, where they had money pouring in from venture capital. They had money coming in, but it wasn't simply from sales. Let's see if that stalls too.

But wasn't his Tesla shares used as collateral for the Twitter financing? If Tesla tanks enough, won't his Saudi banking backers raise hell?

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 day ago

I’m waiting for Musk to have to sell his stock.

[–] Kraiden@kbin.earth 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] IceAgeTower@feddit.it 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

How considerate of you to write in a way fascists can read more easily

[–] Didros@beehaw.org 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Not sure if calling Australians fascists or not

[–] IceAgeTower@feddit.it 2 points 11 hours ago

Never look up for the keywords "Mussolini+Loreto" then

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wonder if Elon is probably going to bail on Tesla after he gets all his SpaceX stock hooked into government contracts and stuff.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Some youtuber was saying as much. A lot of his wealth is tied up in Tesla and a lot of Tesla's valuation is tied up in Musk. But Starlink is making far more than Tesla, he owns a larger portion of it than Tesla, and he's selling Tesla shares. If he makes the right moves he can entirely walk away from Tesla and leave the shareholders holding the bag.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

holding the bag

And not doing shit that tanks the stock price and sales.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago

There are good indications that the stock is overvalued by as much as 10 times, even after the recent drops in stock prices. A lot of that appears to be propped up by his hype. If the stock just normalizes to values typical of other car companies, it will be a major blow to anyone that owns the stock.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›