this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
305 points (99.7% liked)

politics

23071 readers
3433 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TomAwsm@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

Concepts of a process!

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 hours ago
[–] Rookwood@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 11 hours ago

Why didn't you link the NPR report?

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 95 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

You're telling me the Fox News guy couldn't cut it? A conundrum indeed.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 51 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Watch, the next nominee will be Sean Hannity

[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 20 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Maybe Hannity, Carlson, Rogan, Portnoy, and Shawn Ryan can viciously vie for the position in an electrified pentagonal arena.

[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Rogan leaving his podcast for this would be an incredible net positive.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

He wouldn't. He'd just discuss the war plans on the podcast!

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 4 hours ago

hes still important to fox as a mouthpiece, murdoch wont let him go just yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] j0ester@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

Sounds like his merit was not merit enough.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Hopefully the next appointee knows to keep war crimes secret so nobody has to mention them and we can kill thousands of innocents in Yemen with less details leaking to the press.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 8 hours ago

I can forgive the murder of everyone in an apartment building, but not being sloppy on opsec!

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Why, because he was too much qualified? Next one is going to discuss war plans in a public irc channel

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago

Irc is to technical for them. It'll be on nazitter

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee 80 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

What's the conversion of scaramuccis to hegseths?

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 118 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (9 children)

Assuming he's out and replaced tomorrow (makes the conversion easier), he'd be in position for 88 days.

That's 8 mooches (or 2 Trusses for our friends using the metric system).

  • 1 Mooch = 11 Days
  • 1 Truss = 44 days (or 4 Mooches)
  • 1 Hesgeth = 2 Trusses = 8 Mooches
[–] dumbluck@midwest.social 19 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

LOL "or two Trusses for our friends using the metric system"

I needed a good laugh, thank you

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 55 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

That nazi being in office for 88 days seems fitting, doesn't it?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago

Not as fitting as being in office for 0 days, TBH.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)
[–] tischbier@feddit.org 1 points 58 minutes ago

Oo let’s shorten it— ‘AUS! 👉‘ might work better with a naughty dog like Pete haha

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OCATMBBL@lemmy.world 19 points 15 hours ago

1 Hegseth = 1 octomooch

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 17 points 15 hours ago

The metric conversion is very useful thank you

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee 19 points 15 hours ago

I’m sure it would tickle him to have left after 88 days.

Appreciate the mafs.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 10 points 15 hours ago

When this baby reaches 88 days, you're gonna see some serious shit.

  • Doc Brown
[–] OwlPaste@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago

This is amazing 🤩🤩🤩

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 24 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 52 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

They found someone worse already?

[–] YoiksAndAway@lemmy.zip 76 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Start to worry if Kid Rock starts cancelling tour dates.

[–] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 32 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] HaveYouPaidYourDues@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

Here comes the pillow man

[–] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 48 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Imagine replacing your own hand-picked Sectary of Defense after only three months and it's considered a win.

[–] HiddenLychee@lemmy.world 11 points 13 hours ago

Pretty sure he did this every few months his first term

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 8 points 14 hours ago

three months

7.81 Mooches to be exact.

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I wanna know if he’ll pick an even bigger white supremacist?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Impossible. He'll be doing harder drugs.

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

I mean we already have heroin Bobby running the health department.

[–] Jode@midwest.social 17 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I heard Aaron Rodgers is looking for something to do...

Or maybe take Brett Farve before his stupid ass tries to run for governor of Wisconsin.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

They're both QBs, though. Aren't they a better fit for Secretary of Offense?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ryrybang@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Remember, losing his job should only be the most minor thing he faces out of all of this.

He should face felonies for leaking classified information and for actively creating non-traceable government records. He should be spending time in solitary for this, based on other prosecutions.

Just like his boss.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago

I'm honestly surprised they're even worried about optics at this point. They pretty much haven't seemed to care about really anything that's been done or said by team Trump.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 14 points 15 hours ago

I was really hoping they'd keep him, rather than replacing him with the next most sycophantic rich boy in line.

We all know they tolerate rank incompetence and have no care for the lives of americans. Keeping hegseth would be saying that much louder, so now it's someone else's turn to endanger our lives.

[–] Wazowski@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago

Fuckin LOL, next guy will be even worse.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Ah. Finally a fictional Marvel character will become part of the predisent's cabinet.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Probably Wilson Fisk or Lex Luthor, although on second thought, they may be too competent for this administration.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›