as a GUI pleb i just doubleclick the file, which opens kate.
i edit the file and click save, get asked for my password
and all is fine.
this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
616 points (98.0% liked)
linuxmemes
24652 readers
958 users here now
Hint: :q!
Sister communities:
Community rules (click to expand)
1. Follow the site-wide rules
- Instance-wide TOS: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
- Lemmy code of conduct: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html
2. Be civil
- Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
- Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
- Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
- Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
- Bigotry will not be tolerated.
3. Post Linux-related content
- Including Unix and BSD.
- Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of
sudoin Windows. - No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
4. No recent reposts
- Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
5. π¬π§ Language/ΡΠ·ΡΠΊ/Sprache
- This is primarily an English-speaking community. π¬π§π¦πΊπΊπΈ
- Comments written in other languages are allowed.
- The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
- Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
6. (NEW!) Regarding public figures
We all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations. - Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
- We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
- Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed. Β
Please report posts and comments that break these rules!
Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
that's way too simple, the linux gods demand more esoteric suffering
How dare you use computers to do stuff the way they were invented for?
Had an idiot "fix" a permission problem by running "sudo chmod -R 777 /"
And that is why sudo privileges were removed for the vast majority of people.
Shared this before, but someone I know did a chmod on /bin which nuked all the SUID/GUID bits which borked the system lol.
Surpsingly easy enough to undo by getting a list of the correct perms from a working system, but hilarious nonetheless
seems reasonable to me, root is just a made up concept and the human owns the machine.
Oh... That sounds like a nightmare. How do you even fix that? There's no "revert the entire filesystem's permissions to default" button that I'm aware of
You restore the system from backup
If you are lucky your system is atomic or has other roll back feature. Otherwise it's reinstall time.
I guess you could set up a fresh system, run a script that goes through each folder checking the permission and setting it on the target system.
I think they had to reinstall. It was part of a Hadoop cluster and that was extra finicky.
load more comments
(1 replies)
A fellow nano user! There are dozens of us!
Hell yeah gotta embrace the pain of using archaic key bindings that you'll forget until the next time you need to edit a file in the terminal, you must suffer like man. Modem and sane terminal editors are for pussies! If it doesn't load in 0.01 ms it's bloated.. Whatever you do don't install anything like micro, just keep suffering!
load more comments
(8 replies)
Getting flashbacks of me trying to explain to a mac user why using sudo "to make it work" is why he had a growing problem of needing to use sudo... (more and more files owned by root in his home folder).
load more comments
(3 replies)
Total noob. Any experienced user knows it's
run0 micro file.txt
How dare you using a 21st century terminal editor that keeps you sane? You're supposed to learn a whole new set of archaic key bindings! And suffer!
sudo chmod -R 777 /
It's safe because it's sudo! Like sudo rm -rf /*
At one of my prior positions they outsourced all the junior engineers to this firm that only had windows desktop support experience.
Actual escalation I got:
contractor: I am trying to remove this file that is filling the drive but it won't let me
me: show me what you are doing.
contractor (screenshot): # rm -f /dev/hdc
another one did rm -rf /var to clear a stuck log file, which at least did solve the problem he was having.
After that I sent out an email stating that I would not help anyone who used he rm command unless they consulted with a senior first. I was later reprimanded for saying I wouldn't help people.
I was later reprimanded for saying I wouldn't help people.
I've heard that before. "No. I won't close the circuit breaker while you're holding the wires." "Boss!..."
Back in the olden days we used to nfs mount every other machines file system on every machine. I was root and ran "rm -rf /" instead of "./".
After I realized that it was taking too long, i realized my error.
Now for the fun part. In those days nfs passed root privileges to the remote file system. I took out 2.5 machines before I killed it.
Back in the olden days we used to nfs mount every other machines file system on every machine. I was root and ran "rm -rf /" instead of "./".
I still do. With NFS4 even more than ever. Won't let it go unless for a SAN.
Now for the fun part. In those days nfs passed root privileges to the remote file system.
no_root_squash
much?
Like I said, olden days.
Holy smokes. That must have been before 1989 (that's when RFC1094 was released, explicitely prohibiting to map the root user to UID 0). I thought, I was old...
I did this in a cleanup script in a make file with an undefined path that turned the pointed dir to root after a hardware change
thank rngesus I was in a user account with limited privileges
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(5 replies)
why tho?
If it's a file I have to modify once why would I run:
sudo chmod 774 file.conf
sudo chown myuser:myuser file.conf
vi file.conf
sudo chown root:root file.conf
sudo chmod 644 file.conf
instead of:
sudo vi file.conf
Inane. Intentionally convoluted, or someone following the absolute worst tutorials without bothering to understand anything about what they're reading.
I have questions:
- Why are your configurations world readable?
- Why are you setting the executable bit on a .conf file?
- Why change the files group alongside the owner when you've just given the owner rxw and you're going to set it back?
- If it was 644 before, why 774?
- Why even change the mode if you're going to change the ownership?
- Why do you want roots vimrc instead of your users
- Why do you hate sudoedit
- Why go out of your way to make this appear more convoluted than it actually is?
Even jokey comments can lead to people copying bad habits if it's not clear they're jokes.
This was a joke right? I was baited by your trolling?
I felt kinda bad doing that at first. then your absolute rage made my doubt's melt away.
doubtβs
I see what you did there
load more comments
(1 replies)
sudo dolphin
Then I act like a Windows user and go there via the GUI because I didn't feel like learning how to use nano.
load more comments
(7 replies)
sudo = shut up dammit, obey!
obligatory... (well, you know the rest)
personally, I prefer the good ol double bang (!!), but whatever floats yer boat, and all that.
I mean if you double bang me I'm likely to do whatever you want, too.
load more comments
(1 replies)
You meant sudo vim, ok?
(disclaimer: joke. Let the unholy war start)
Great one. Many thanks!
load more comments
(9 replies)
If your file is not in your home directory, you shouldn't do chmod or chown in any other file
load more comments
(2 replies)
view more: next βΊ