this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
273 points (98.9% liked)

News

29328 readers
3358 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Beachwood Police Department reported on May 2 the man checked out the hundred books from the Cuyahoga County Public Library Beachwood Branch, and posted a video of him burning the books on social media.

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] muusemuuse@lemm.ee 13 points 5 hours ago

I emailed this library asking them which books they don't expect to be getting back. They told me they couldn’t even release that information but they already are in the process of replacing them. Class act.

[–] Salvo@aussie.zone 1 points 3 hours ago

After this he joined DOGI and went to the Library of Congress.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Boom burning is... Not what it used to be.

It's purely symbolic.

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago

Anybody have 100 bibles I can borrow? You'll thank me later.

[–] gwilikers@lemmy.ml 18 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

On Monday, Heights Christian Church, which describes itself as “open to and affirming of all people, celebrating and finding strength in our diversity + affirming the dignity + worth of every person,” hosted an Action and Press Conference “against this hateful act.”

HCC said the event joins forces with Interfaith Group Against Hate to condemn the action.

Besides condemning the action, IGAH will be promoting support for our libraries. We will also be presenting a plan of action that will include partnering with local bookshops to purchase books, as well as community readings and discussion on topics that promote diversity and free speech. Heights Christian Church

Honestly, pretty good response from the community and church.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 15 points 11 hours ago

Just following the Nazi doctrine to the book...

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 13 points 11 hours ago

Make him pay for new books, add a juicy fine to it so the library can add a new wing, an then put him behind bars for hate crimes.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 79 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

If your faith and beliefs are so righteous, strong, moral and important ..... you would never need to burn books to make others follow your convictions.

Burning books just goes to show how deranged and unbalanced your beliefs are

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 27 points 15 hours ago

God is on their side, but for some reason He can only accomplish His goals by having humans act on His behalf. By coincidence, the same would be true if there were no God at all.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

I wouldn't burn a copy of Mein Kampf, unless that's the only political point of view in the library. I'm sure that library had plenty of right-wing books and were much more popular.

[–] werewolfborg@ttrpg.network 26 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (3 children)

Hopefully they charge him the value of each of the 100 books on top of whatever criminal charges he would get for damaging library property. That should be over $1,000 just because of the sheer amount of books.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 9 points 12 hours ago

1000 dollars? He'll be a gofund me millionaire by the end of the month.

[–] doctortofu@reddthat.com 4 points 11 hours ago

That, and every replaced book should have a big dedication inside, saying something like "purchased with a generous donation of Mr [this twit's name]"

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 2 points 11 hours ago

Hm, I would have said it's not arson if he did it on his own property in a safe manner. But I also don't know if the definition of arson includes any burning of others' property without permission, even if you were allowed to bring the property somewhere where you're allowed to start fires...

[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 41 points 16 hours ago

The book burners are always the good guys, right?

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

As long as the fines he is now due cover the cost of rebuying brand new copies, I thank him for his donation.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

What library lets you check out 100 books at one time? Also was there no red flags, when he was checking out these specific books? I hope he banned from all libraries and book stores for life. Mother fucker should get prison time as well.

[–] zed_arthen@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 hours ago

The main hope of a library is that people will have access to the materials they need and not get blocked by arbitrary low checkout limits. The limit is mostly just to keep one smart ass from checking out over half the library. If you have a smaller library, it may make sense to have a smaller checkout limit. As one who works at a library with a max checkout of 100 items, very few people ever check out that many items and the ones who do are usually super homeschooler’s who use a ton of children’s books in their curriculums. That or people who are working on a very large music collection. Most libraries also use self check units, so staff may not even know if someone is pushing their limit. As long as the books come back and in one piece, they also don’t usually care as increased circulation can actually help library funding.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 4 points 9 hours ago

Yeah, I guess they thought he was doing a big research project on diversity lol. Banned from libraries, sure obviously. Banned from book stores? Why? He's good business! If I owned a book store I'd gladly sell him 100 books, and 100 more when he's done.

I disagree with his views, and he definitely should pay for every book he burned, but I'll defend to the death the right to burn things in protest.

[–] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 16 hours ago

Yes, burning books, always a deed fondly remembered by history.

[–] hansolo@lemm.ee 17 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

"The man is already polling at 40% approval among GOP voters."

[–] azimir@lemmy.ml 10 points 14 hours ago

He's on the short list for the head slot at the Library of Congress.

Anybody got a line on this dude's identity?

[–] VirgilMastercard@reddthat.com 9 points 16 hours ago

Stupid teabaggers, they're absolutely deranged

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 10 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe we can deport them to El Salvador?

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago

trump will probably try to appoint him to run the library of congress.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

And so I assume the library will send the sketchiest bailiffs they can find to collect their fines?

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 3 points 15 hours ago

This nation was founded on the right to free speech and open expression

By literal slavers.

[–] Luouth@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago

Sucking up to orange Shitler