this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
269 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

72686 readers
2878 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 75 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Honestly, I've always thought the best use case for AI is moderating NSFL content online. No one should have to see that horrific shit.

[–] HowAbt2day@futurology.today 22 points 1 month ago

Not suitable for Lemmy?

[–] ouch@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What about false positives? Or a process to challenge them?

But yes, I agree with the general idea.

[–] beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 month ago

Or a process to challenge them?

😂😂😂😔

[–] tarknassus@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

They will probably use the YouTube model - “you’re wrong and that’s it”.

[–] brorodeo@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Bsky already does that.

[–] head_socj@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago

Agreed. These jobs are overwhelmingly concentratedin developing nations and pay pathetic wages, too.

[–] towerful@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

Yup.
It's a traumatic job/task that gets farmed to the cheapest supplier which is extremely unlikely to have suitable safe guards and care for their employees.

If I were implementing this, I would use a safer/stricter model with a human backed appeal system.
I would then use some metrics to generate an account reputation (verified ID, interaction with friends network, previous posts/moderation/appeals), and use that to either: auto-approve AI actions with no appeals (low rep); auto-approve AI actions with human appeal (moderate rep); AI actions must be approved by humans (high rep).

This way, high reputation accounts can still discuss & raise awareness of potentially moderatable topics as quickly as they happen (think breaking news kinda thing). Moderate reputation accounts can argue their case (in case of false positives). Low reputation accounts don't traumatize the moderators.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 41 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Great move for Facebook. It'll let them claim they're doing something to curb horrid content on the platform without actually doing anything.

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago

The marketing behind AI must feel like a runners high. “Something has AI”

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

This might be the one time I'm okay with this. It's too hard on the humans that did this. I hope the AI won't "learn" to be cruel from this though, and I don't trust Meta to handle this gracefully.

[–] chrash0@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

pretty common misconception about how “AI” works. models aren’t constantly learning. their weights are frozen before deployment. they can infer from context quite a bit, but they won’t meaningfully change without human intervention (for now)

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean, you could hire people who would otherwise enjoy the things they moderate. Keep em from doing shit themselves.

But, if all the sadists, psychos, and pedos were moderating, it would be reddit, I guess.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

My guess is you dont know how bad it is. These people at Meta has real PTSD, and it would absolutly benefit everyone, if this in any way could be automatic with AI.

Next question is though, do you trust Meta to moderate? Nah, should be an independent AI, they couldnt tinker with.

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 23 points 1 month ago

moderation on facebook? i'm sure it can be found right next to bigfoot

(other than automated immediate nipple removal)

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Only if the also take the full legal responsibility for the AIs actions.

[–] muusemuuse@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago

They don’t even take responsibility for things now.

[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

The business model IS dodging any kind of responsibility so... yeah, I think they'll pass.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 20 points 1 month ago

Well hey that actually sounds like a job AI could be good at. Just give it a prompt like "tell me there are no privacy issues because we don't care" and it'll do just that!

[–] philpo@feddit.org 11 points 1 month ago

In the other news: Meta pays another 3 billion Euro due to not following the DSA and getting banned in Europe.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think AI is positioned to make better decisions than execs. The money saved would be huge!

[–] mitrosus@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The money saved goes where?

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It goes to pay off the debt of all of the nations in the world and will then usher in a new age of peace, obviously.

[–] mitrosus@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

Haha. That says it all.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

A bold strategy, Cotton

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Would be a shame if people had so sift through AI generated gore before the bots like and comment it. But seriously, good on them.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Oh man, I may have to stop using this fascist sewer hose.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Following Tumblr's lead, I see...

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

That's gonna end well😉

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago

great idea..!

[–] wwb4itcgas@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

I've never had a horse in this race, and I never will - but I'm sure this will work out well for those who do. /s