this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2025
388 points (97.8% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

7485 readers
24 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 89 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In the 4th year of the 3-day special military operation, victory is near

[–] eta@feddit.org 34 points 4 days ago

Ukraine: Look at me, I'm doing the special military operation now

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 34 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Ukrainians used drones and a complex planned out attack to destroy russia's military equipment...russia just used a pencil instead!

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well you have to understand, Soviet Russia beat the US in the Space Race by sending cosmonauts with pencils. The Americans spent tens of millions of dollars developing a pen that works in space. They are wasteful. It's not like pencils create any graphite dust that could potentially clog the air filters on MIR.

[–] Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It would also be crazy if instead of spending millions on R&D, they just bought the pens from a company at MSRP...

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Normal pens need gravity to work. IIRC NASA did actually buy the pens at MSRP, and the guy that invented the pens wasnt at all involved in the space program. He was solving a different issue, whos solution happened to work for NASA

[–] Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

"the guy" who invented the space pens is a whole entire company that makes many things and is staffed by many people.

The "space pens" are just their normal pens but with pressurized ink cartridges and special ink (and the development was paid in full by Fisher) but they were bought at MSRP by NASA. And because everything NASA does is public domain, you can actually see the original PO for the pens! They spent $2.25/pen in November 1967 which would be worth about $28 today.

[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 51 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I swear to god. I was scrolling and read this and actually thought it was serious at first. Had a good laugh afterward, so thank you.

I thought I accidentally unblocked hexbear or something Lmao.

[–] Shawdow194@fedia.io 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Needs more garbage incorporated into the design

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is peak Russian design. Made by AI and copying a so called German design.

[–] pixelkitty@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

The Sheißpanzer ™️

[–] Hazmatastic@lemmy.world 27 points 4 days ago

Wild picture, that reminds me, did you know that in 1998, The Undertaker threw Mankind off Hell In A Cell, and plummeted 16 ft through a Torpolev Tu-95?

[–] houstoneulers@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Please let cyber trucks be their next big mobile advancement

[–] wieson@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago

Check out LARPing as a dwarf ramzan kadyrov

[–] Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works 17 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Already anticipated by the Ukrainians as they wheel out their newest anti-plane drones.

Fitted with a bouncy ball on the ventral side of the drone to allow for "skipping" into place under the plane prior to upward thrusting.

Sometimes the charge goes off immediately, sometimes it takes a little floorplay to prime. Preliminary testing has resulted in 9/10 devastated planes and 1/10 hybrid plane/drone offspring with a nuclear family.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Vintage Story allows you to skip stones off of water, because they decided to model that. I wonder what the modeling code of a drone skipping across a battlefield looks like.

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Approved use of image generation

[–] daw@feddit.org 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 1 points 3 days ago

I don't think people in this sub in particular care all that much

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 13 points 4 days ago (4 children)

The amazing thing about this to me is these were aircraft worth hundreds of millions of dollars each, parked out in the elements.

Even without the threat of enemy action, surely that would cause maintenance issues?

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 34 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The budget for reinforced hangars is floating in the form of giant yachts around the world

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The US basically stores hundreds of B-52 airframes out in the elements. Admittedly the worst those airframes see is the occasional haboob, aka sandstorm, or some torrential rain, but that's only a few days a year.

Of course that is the boneyards in NM and AZ. The operational ones are kept in hangers at Air Force bases in the middle of the Continental US. I don't know if those are climate controlled, but it wouldn't surprise me if they were.

Oh, right. The B-52 is the plane that the USSR was copying when they made the bombers that were just blown up.

Also storing them in a hanger wouldn't matter to most of these drones since more often than not the hanger doors are left open, and even when closed they are typically made of sheet metal. So the Ukrainians would have just blown a hole in the sheet metal before driving the next drone into the bomber.

This operation was some serious Tom Clancy style sci-fi military intelligence porn come to life.

[–] Justas@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You could just store them in tarp tents or something. Also, build a bunch of fake tents around, now you doubled or tripled the amount of targets the Ukrainians have to hit.

But Russians don't think that way. Maybe, they don't think at all?

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The Ukrainians have satellite photos and live drone coverage. They have proven their abilities to penetrate both camouflage and Russian cope cages.

Meanwhile the Russians can't manage to produce their own microprocessors, electronics, or even basic fabrics. What makes you think they are spending their limited rubles on tarps?

[–] Justas@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

I'm not sure that they can't make basic fabrics. Tarps aren't that expensive and they can make them themselves? They could also use things like bedsheets?

If they had a lot of plane-shaped piles of fabric along the runway, it might be difficult to tell which ones hide an airplane beneath, especially if you moved them around every day during the night.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Hangar space is incredibly expensive in the bulk quantity and size needed for a large air force with some of the largest planes on the planet.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, but compared to the capital cost of the aircraft, is it really that expensive?

[–] eta@feddit.org 9 points 4 days ago

As far as I know Russia was moving planes around to maybe prepare a bigger operation. Since they can't build hangars for all planes everywhere they parked them outside. And planes are made to withstand the elements so it's not so bad for them to stand outside for a while. If the conditions were too bad for long time storage you could just fly the plane somewhere else aswell.

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Where is fluffy spicy feeler tank – version

I swear they are verifying results of failed ML models for Grok using a Code Bullet failed intern

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Ha ha thank you for the real laugh!

[–] dave@feddit.uk 2 points 4 days ago

Is that Otto at the controls?

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I think they are trying to protect against those spicy explody drones that keep landing on their cool toys.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The only thing that makes me even a bit sad is that much like the Anotov AN-225 Mriya, these Russian versions of the US BUFF can't be replaced.

I don't approve of what they have been used for, and don't approve of their use at all. Much like I don't approve of the US using their B-52s, aka Big Ugly Fat Fucker, aka BUFF.

I hope Ukraine manages to force a Russian surrender before all of the examples of halfway decent Soviet engineering are destroyed. We need to keep some of them, if only as examples of what NOT TO DO.

[–] breecher@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

Nah, burn them all.