this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2025
28 points (57.3% liked)

Technology

71396 readers
4492 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago

Perhaps the actual answer is for people to learn self control.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 27 minutes ago

Ehhhh no.

I can get behind "ban spying on me."

I can even get behind "ban social media, especially the kind that makes you sell yourself, though pseudononymous link aggregators are less the issue."

But "no more torrenting at work, no more reading digitally while pooping, no more encrypted chats, now have to carry a book, a camera, an mp3 player, my GBC, and a dumb phone, just to make up for the phone?"

No.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

Is Jacobin just garbage or am I just seeing only garbage articles?

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 12 points 12 hours ago

No. Smartphones convicted the murderer of George Floyd. Smartphones have shown to the world the police brutality that happens at peaceful protests. Technology isn't inherently evil, it's how its used.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 12 hours ago

How about no. I've been wanting a pocketable "do everything" device since I got a Tiger Electronics Pokedex as a kid.

How about better regulations on the obscene amount of data collection going on behind our backs? I can't count how many times I've come across even just websites that have a giant "accept all cookies" button, but in order to reject any, you have to dig through layers and layers of "settings". The most I've seen was 80+. And that's just websites.

I'm about to wipe my phone and go all-in on Calyx OS.

Me who has a disability which prevents me from speaking and hearing people and renders me bedridden.

“Okay, guess I’ll die then”

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 15 hours ago

The problem is with planned obsolescence and capitalist drive to always make more. The device itself is not inherently bad, it's a glorified calculator.

[–] TurboHarbinger@feddit.cl 5 points 14 hours ago

Hey David, can you guess how many people are reading your article from a smartphone? Convenient, isn't it.

Want to complain about smartphones? Write a book... or something that can be published on fucking paper.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 20 points 21 hours ago

Ban social media and advertising/marketing. Smart phones are just a small computer.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 22 hours ago

I'm pretty far down the luddite/makhaevist wormhole... But this is just a garbage idea.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 91 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ban smartphones makes about as much sense as ban drugs or ban guns. It does nothing to address root causes and will do little to change anything for the better. Societal issues take more than “make X illegal”.

[–] Darleys_Brew@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

If USA banned guns, they might have a few less shootings.

[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 1 points 15 hours ago

Battling anything is built of two parts, making it immoral, and making it illegal. Making it illegal makes it easier to argue that it's immoral, because many people take cues for their morality from legality, but if you want to keep it illegal you have to maintain the cultural belief in its immorality. Each reinforces the other.

[–] ricdeh@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is literally not a problem with smartphones, the problem is about the software you decide to run on it. A smartphone is simply a very powerful pocket computer.

[–] LPThinker@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I agree, except that we are legally not allowed to control the software on our phones in lots of cases. Notifications, ads, upgrades, etc. are all controlled by the manufacturer and it's illegal to override their software on the device you own.

Add to that that specific pieces of software are becoming increasingly necessary to function in society, and you start to see that it's not really a matter of individual choice, anymore than people shopping at walmart can be blamed for buying processed, sugary foods when that's 90% of what walmart stocks (And all they promote), and walmart is the only affordable option in their community.

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 hours ago

Illegal? What jurisdiction? There are tons of Lineage OS users and I haven't heard of anyone getting arrested for using them.

[–] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

I've been able to turn off notifications for anything on my phone. Only the few apps I choose to allow still give me notifications.

I am fortunate to have a job that does not require a cell phone, I can leave it behind for hours at a time without affecting my work. I know this is not the case for everyone, but it should be an option.

At the very least, a phone required for work should have a separate phone number and email account, and should turn off automatically after the employee clocks out for the day. Some countries already have laws about this stuff, we should do that more.

[–] 52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 day ago

Do it anyway. I use adb to modify my phone and make it suck less. I also look forward to the day (if it ever comes) where Linux phones are a viable replacement option.

[–] 6nk06@sh.itjust.works 58 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Smartphones are fine, it's just a small computer that can make calls and is connected to the internet. You're using it wrong.

If people can't control themselves or their kids, it's not my problem.

[–] Ibuthyr@lemmy.wtf 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The rise of fascists isn't your problem? Believe it or not, they'd never be this strong if it weren't for brainwashing the masses via smartphones.

[–] 6nk06@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

We had the same propaganda with books, radio, and TV. Should we ban those things too?

[–] BangelaQuirkel@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not your problem yet

That being said: just banning smartphones isn’t gonna cut it.

[–] 6nk06@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's a lot of problems that I would never solve on my own, and both politicians and citizens don't want to change: social media and AI are destroying humans, shitty parents dont want to take care of their kids, and climate change is destroying the world. It's inevitable but the smartphone that I use is not responsible.

[–] yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Author admits smartphones are ubiquitous, and doesn't at all consider, in a hypothetical situation where everyone unanimously agreed to stop using them, where all this e-waste will go?

Also, how do you disillusion the millions of people that use them religiously?

I get the sentiment, but only a significant technologically literate society would really appreciate the need for greater control over their devices and actually possess the skills needed to modify and configure them.

[–] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago

Current smart phones will become e-waste either way. On that front, the benefit would be forcing all manufacturers to stop creating more e-waste for the future.

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 4 points 22 hours ago

Author admits smartphones are ubiquitous, and doesn’t at all consider, in a hypothetical situation where everyone unanimously agreed to stop using them, where all this e-waste will go?

Pretty much every single smartphone in use right now will be ewaste 20 years from now, and most of them will be within 10. So we have that disposal problem already regardless. Hypothetically, if everyone were to get rid of their phones, we'd at least stop creating even more future ewaste.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

Many of us want to disconnect, but we can’t do so alone — not without losing touch with the world around us. Disconnection, today, carries real social and economic costs. Until such time as smartphones and social media can be democratically governed or nationalized — liberated from the imperative to profit off our attention indefinitely — a ban may be the most realistic path to reclaiming our lives.

If the author can't stop using whatever website he's upset about without requiring everyone else to have their smartphones banned, that sounds like a him problem.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] match@pawb.social 18 points 1 day ago (5 children)

smartphones are one of rhe hundreds o things that would probably be just fine and good if it weren't for capitalism

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 hours ago

Idk, Smartphones under Feudalism can be just as bad, if not worse.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 0 points 15 hours ago

classic lemmy

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

All claims and no reasoning.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 22 hours ago

But people clicked it, and it's the only thing that matters. Of course banning smartphones completely is a stupid idea, but it's a wild claim that draws attention.

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lembot_0003@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Smartphones make us more social, allowing us to reach each other ad hoc, not just by planning the meeting for a week. They makes us more free by providing helping tools like GPS and similar. They make us happier by helping to kill time while standing in the line or riding on the bus.

You're doing something wrong.

load more comments (8 replies)

No. If you wanna ditch the Internet, go right ahead.

[–] fistac0rpse@fedia.io 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

can we just ban people in general instead?

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

And then what? Go back to the stone age?

Kids waiting to get picked at school and their parents have emergency, how are they gonna inform the others to get picked up? Are they gonna just let that kid suck it up and wait for hours, just like the good old times?

[–] nullPointer@programming.dev 1 points 16 hours ago

1-800-collect

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

What? Corded phones exist, and most schools and offices have at least one in each room. Dumb phones exist. Pagers exist.

Smart phones are not the only singular solution for easy, quick contact.

[–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 3 points 21 hours ago

The stone age = any time before 2005 apparently 🙄

load more comments
view more: next ›