this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
291 points (96.5% liked)

Not The Onion

16813 readers
2878 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 hours ago

wow, getting desperate with the marketing over there.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 3 points 2 hours ago

So he fired the Nanny in favor if chat GPT?

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 18 points 4 hours ago

"Those first few weeks it was constantly," he says of his tendency to consult ChatGPT on childcare.

Dude, I wouldn't trust ChatGPT for plant care 😂

[–] aaron@infosec.pub 8 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Presumably he means the financial success of chatgpt paid for the coterie of staff he employs to look after the child he never sees.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 17 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Why would you admit you're a complete moron like that?

[–] formergijoe@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Because other complete morons will now buy the product?

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 3 points 4 hours ago

I would do it if it got me a million dollars

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Wtf is a supremo actually don't tell me I never wanna use it again

[–] neomachino@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I can't think of a single thing I would trust chat gpt with, especially when it come to my kids.

I'm trying to rationalize what you could even ask it that's not a single Google search away with a forum or blog post written by (hopefully) human fucking beans who have gone through the same thing you're experiencing and figured it out.

For every parenting question you have there's 100 different answers, at least 20 of them are reasonable, pick one of those 20 and figure it out.

While writing this I tried something. Chat gpt told me a 4 month old needs around 14 ounces of milk in a day if their breast feeding. Which is about half the actual number. I think the recommendation is ~25 /day, my kid drinks ~30. If I gave him 14 a day I think he'd learn how to walk just to kill me.

[–] v_krishna@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Mustakrakish@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

All that really says is its inconsistent

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 12 points 5 hours ago

Put that child in a foster home before he abuses it even more.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 19 points 10 hours ago

This guy's kid is going to be so fucked up

[–] C1pher@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Jesus crist, this guy is lucky he even has a child, unless he used ChatGPT for that too :D

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 3 points 9 hours ago

Altman: "How does one have a baby?"

ChatGPT: "You see, when a mommy and daddy love each other..."

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Come on lol, that’s obviously hyperbolic

[–] vinceman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 hours ago

Why is this a "come on lol". In what world is what Sam Altman doing responsible?

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 4 points 10 hours ago

We have mistaken rationality for a philosophy rather than a methodology, and efficiency for a virtue without any particular end in mind.

To have a unique, personal, subjective, divergent human experience is to sin against your prescribed algorithm.

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 23 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Is he admitting ignorance to something that literally tens of billions of people have done, including people who can't read and never knew what a computer was, or even how to make fire? This is the guy who we should trust with making an "artificial intelligence"?

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

To be fair, programmers don't make great dads, it's rather hard to program your kid

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 hours ago

Dr Skinner enters the chat

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 3 points 11 hours ago

Ok, guys, at least Mr Sam is wannabe Steve Jobs and not wannabe a Hitler's orange hair twin

[–] GeekFTW@lemmy.zip 136 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Imagine waking up one day and admitting to the world that you are that goddamned fucking useless of a human being? Mind boggling.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 42 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

oh dude, my brother and sister in law have this story they like to tell about me where they abandoned their three year old child at a park because they expected me to be there. they never contacted me about watching or caring for their kid, i just busked there every other thursday. i had a doctor's appointment so i wasn't there. the way they tell it, i'm the villain (their neighbor found their child wandering around the park and brought them home. apparently i'm at fault for being 30 miles away the entire time) but, uh, they really like the story.

my brother does not know why his circle of friends keeps shrinking.

[–] shadowedcross@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 hours ago

Your brother and sister in law sound like they were made for each other, both insane.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 13 points 19 hours ago

You have to understand that like 50% of the American population are even more useless than him.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 21 points 17 hours ago

If he literally knew nothing and was worried for his child he could have hired a well paid live-in nursemaid and forgotten about the money it cost the next half hour.

Instead he used his child as an experiment.

“Hey dad, are you proud of me?”

“I’m proud of the value you created for me and the shareholders.”

[–] Kintarian@lemmy.world 70 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

I wonder why all the tech bros are completely off their rockers.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 25 points 22 hours ago
[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Lack of empathy, born with golden spoons in their mouths

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago

what a fucking useless human.

I vote we start calling me Elon Jr.

[–] ApeNo1@lemmy.world 36 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

ChatGPT prompt : “How do you make arrangements to have a live in nanny to take care of your child?”

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 42 points 21 hours ago

You know what? I believe him.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 14 points 18 hours ago

so he's an idiot, got it

[–] Naich@lemmings.world 63 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

I mean it's fair enough. It's not like anyone has ever done it before. There is literally no information available about this uniquely modern process.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 11 hours ago

plus it's such a horrendously complex thing that you definitely can't largely figure out on your own

hey my infant keeps leaking this foul smelling brown stuff, what's going on??? if only i had access to AI so i could figure this out..

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world 14 points 18 hours ago

then why even have a baby? the joy of caring for that child--of experiencing fatherhood--is a big reason for having babies.

not taking steps to learn how to be a father is like buying a hog and slapping training wheels on it. you're never going to get to really enjoy that ride.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 17 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It just goes to show. Financial success doesn't equal a good person (or parent, in this case)

[–] brax@sh.itjust.works 6 points 18 hours ago

Pretty sure it's an inverse correlation or maybe a bell curve with some outliers on either end.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 17 points 21 hours ago

Holy shit we are definitely living in a satire simulation running as a VR experience for people living in a less funny but just as brutal reality.

Like holy shit you can't write this shit, this has got to have people at The Onion quaking in their papery and layered exteriors.

[–] LostWanderer@lemmynsfw.com 21 points 23 hours ago

Sam Altman at this point is a parody of a human being, one that failed upwards in spectacular fashion. I can't wait to see the postmortem of why AI failed, and this weird advert for AI to be cited. ROFL

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 13 points 21 hours ago

Altman reminds of all those robot Zuckerberg memes.

[–] RockBottom@feddit.org 15 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

What would be Darwin‘s response?

[–] Naich@lemmings.world 2 points 11 hours ago

He'd fuck off to the Galapagos and hide from all the idiots.

load more comments
view more: next ›