this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
647 points (98.4% liked)

News

30555 readers
4729 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hedge-fund billionaire Bill Ackman plans to bankroll a New York City mayoral campaign, arguing that his affluent associates are poised to flood the election with money in an effort to defeat Democratic Socialist frontrunner Zohran Mamdani.

Ackman said he was “gravely concerned” because he believed the left-wing candidate’s policies would be disastrous, triggering an exodus of the wealthy that would endanger New York’s public services by hollowing out its tax base.

Arguing that his own support of President Trump would automatically disqualify anyone Ackman might put forward, the activist investor said he was making a public appeal: Anyone capable of taking down Mamdani in the Nov. 4 election should step forward and volunteer.

“Importantly, there are hundreds of millions of dollars of capital available to back a competitor to Mamdani that can be put together overnight (believe me, I am in the text strings and the WhatsApp groups) so that a great alternative candidate won’t spend any time,” he wrote.

“So if the right candidate would raise his or her hand tomorrow, the funds will pour in.”

It’s unclear whether New Yorkers would honor such a candidate. The recent intervention by Elon Musk in Wisconsin’s state supreme court election indicated the voting public does not always respond well to billionaires using their money to sway races.

New York mayoral races are notoriously unpredictable due to the city’s chronically low turnout. In 2017, for example, Bill de Blasio won reelection with only 14% of registered voters coming out to support him.

A large influx of New Yorkers heading to the voting booth because they are as concerned as Ackman could easily affect the outcome. If Cuomo can hold on to enough fundraisers, political pundits also point out, it’s possible he could run as an independent like Adams, splitting the left vote and spoiling the race.

Ackman, however, argued all these factors would support the emergence of a centrist candidate looking to position themself on the national stage. It could even be another businessman like Bloomberg, he suggested, although Ackman in an earlier post appeared to indicate he would not seek to run himself.

“For the aspiring politician there is no better way to get name recognition, build relationships with long-term donors, and to showcase oneself,” the hedge fund manager wrote, pitching the campaign like a business deal. “The risk/reward of running for mayor over the next 132 days is extremely compelling as the cost in time and energy is small and the upside is enormous.”

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Honestly, I'm really liking how this race is shaping up. Adams is refusing to drop out because, well, he can't; the second he loses power he stops being useful to the Trump administration, and then he's vulnerable to prosecution. Cuomo is also staying in because he's a narcissist, and Ackman is willing to throw money at anyone else who wants to run.

So that means the centrist shit-libs and conservative ghouls are splitting their vote between at least two, probably three candidates, while the progressive vote will go entirely to Mamdani. I'm still wary of DNC fuckery, but so far, so good.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Is the NYC Mayor General also ranked choice? Vote splitting is less impactful with ranked choice.

Still, it would be nice to see what a democratic socialist executive can do with NYC.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Great question, IT IS NOT! Only the NYC primaries and special elections are ranked choice, but the general elections are still first-past-the-post! So Cuomo and Adams will most certainly hurt each other if they both refuse to drop out!

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Hopefully, the DNC won't do something stupid (e.g. support someone other than Mamdani).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Billionaires trying to buy elections

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's really no excuse for this

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Ackman said he was “gravely concerned” because he believed the left-wing candidate’s policies would be disastrous, triggering an exodus of the wealthy that would endanger New York’s public services by hollowing out its tax base.

Fucking seriously.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Those rich people aren't going anywhere. Theres not another New York City. They're not gonna pack up their factories and offices with datacenters and move them elsewhere.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago

And it's all because he's ~~a dirty democrat~~ ~~a dirty muslim~~ ~a dirty ~socialist~~ will let poor people be less poor and rich people be a little less rich

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 44 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Bill Ackman is evil and actively harming the NY and US economy. He wants people to become poorer year after year, until they can't spend on consumption anymore, and that will cripple the economy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 51 points 2 days ago (11 children)

So let me get this straight. Current tax law favors billionaires. He’s concerned that progressive policies will target taxing billionaires forcing a mass exodus of billionaires thereby undercutting the tax base. In other words they’re already not paying taxes but taxing them more will make them leave. Make it make sense.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 321 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Billionaires are against Mamdani, eh? Something tells me he is the right guy for the job then.

[–] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I mean, this guy must live in an insane bubble if he doesn’t understand that this will help Mamdami more than if he had endorsed them. I am sure NYC voters will just rally around a guy who, through funding, owns its allegiance to billionaires.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Remember when Bloomberg tried running for president for like 2 weeks?

Somehow I expect similar effect, burning cash without budging almost anyone.

[–] kemsat@lemmy.world 59 points 2 days ago (2 children)

So they are ok with spending hundreds of millions of dollars, just not in any way that actually improves the city for the people that live in it?

It’s not about the money, it’s just misanthropy.

[–] e461h@sh.itjust.works 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Exactly. The ‘public services’ he wants to save is bribery to avoid paying his fair share. This guy is offering a ‘powerful people’ club membership so he can avoid giving back to a society that enabled his mindblowing fortune. Our system has gotten so used to it he’s totally good with saying it all out loud as if he’s some sort of victim.

Society’s cancer.

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago

A leech trying to explain why it's good it's sucking your blood.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 210 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Billionaires are scared. That's a good sign ..

[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Luigi saved lives and billionaires cried.

[–] ObtuseDoorFrame@lemm.ee 57 points 2 days ago (7 children)

What's super ironic to me is that taxing them actually makes them safer because if they pay their fair share people wouldn't want to murder them as much as they do now.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Billionaires control the actual weapons of murder, surveillance, torture, etc. They're completely protected regardless of their tax bill. One Luigi isn't going to change that.

[–] ObtuseDoorFrame@lemm.ee 1 points 22 hours ago

One person has already made a massive difference, and the ruling class is scared. What if we had 100 Luigi's? How about a million? How about 100 million? Luigi is inspiring people. Maybe he was the first snowball of an avalanche.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 174 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

So kind of this guy to give Mamdani an incredible basis for an ad campaign.

Like, for real, does this rich fuck not understanding that the vast majority of the American populace wants to see more blue shells? Honestly, how could it be more clear? All Zohran has to do is something like:

There’s an old proverb that says you should judge a person by the enemies they’ve made. Well, I’ve made an enemy of the billionaire Bill Ackman, and he’s pledged a blank check to whoever runs against me. But, there’s good news: votes decide elections, not money. I’m not listening to the money. I’m listening to the voters. I’m listening to you. Let’s win this together.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 22 hours ago

does this rich fuck not understand

No.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ThePiedPooper@discuss.online 27 points 2 days ago

Anyone who the billionaire hedge fund manager is planning to bankroll is the guy you probably should be voting against.

[–] AHamSandwich@lemmy.world 74 points 2 days ago
[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 62 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's wild that they billionaires are openly just saying "whoops, we can't be letting the people elect someone good for them, here let's fix that".

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

It's beautiful. Mamdani and any other socialist will campaign on this hard. These mfkers have gotten really dumb having amassed wealth in an environment where their ancestors had made relative peace with the working class in part by propagandizing that rich people are food for the workers. They seem to think that the status quo where people aren't wholesale anti-rich is a stable equilibrium. I guess they're not reading the latest data.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] besselj@lemmy.ca 114 points 2 days ago

Billionaires should not exist.

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 27 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

As a potential independent candidate Cuomo didn't poll that bad if you don't consider that:

  • the 39% he got are the same as Mamdani, so it would be 50/50 at best
  • as a known quantity, this 39% are probably his ceiling
  • it still didn't factor Schumer effectively endorsing Mamdani on social media

Political players are in still in flux, but, for the right wing of the Democratic Party, moving against Mamdani is getting riskier and riskier by the day. Not only would they lose the "unity" argument to mobilize the left close to the midterms, but the risk of suffering an humiliating defeat is too great.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

So hes a Trump supporter but doesn't like Sliwa so he's just going to fund an independent? Lmao.

Its good that he's not just funding Sliwa, looks like a rift is forming in the red party.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 99 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Ackman said he was “gravely concerned” because he believed the left-wing candidate’s policies would be disastrous, triggering an exodus of the wealthy that would endanger New York’s public services by hollowing out its tax base.

wtf? Is this really the route they're going to take? I know, pay your fucking share of taxes and then there wouldn't be a "hollowing out."

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 85 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A billionaire just causally announcing that he can influence, finance and promote an election using his money in order to get what only interests themselves ... rather than in allowing democratic processes elect someone the people actually want and need.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›