this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2025
206 points (99.0% liked)

News

30655 readers
5023 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Smucker joins a growing number of big food companies that have announced plans to eliminate artificial dyes.

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 36 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I had to check, because I was pretty sure there's already no dyes in their jam and that is true.

You can make jam easily by boiling 2 cups rinsed and hulled (and cut if you like smaller bits) strawberries with the juice of a lemon and 2 cups of sugar for about 8 minutes, scraping the bottom with a silicone spatula or wooden spoon. It will be a nice bright color without any help. If you're not proficient with doing sterile jars, store half in the fridge and half in the freezer.

Turns out the dyes are mostly in Hostess baked goods and other companies they've acquired.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is the way. I make a great sweet and sour sauce with frozen cranberries, sugar, a little butter and water. Making stuff at home is so much better tasting, you don't over eat it and it's cheaper.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Storebought is fine if you need jam and don't have time or energy.

But if you aren't up for eating all of those fresh berries in the fridge before they go bad, there's a reason it's called "preserves." And you can mix different berries, even pitted cherries, or I've added a pouch of açai before, it's all good, just different. If you want it smooth, use a blender or scrape it through a strainer. I've subbed Xylitol for the sugar and it works too.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

Found jordan_the_stallion8.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Unless they had, like, blue raspberry you don't really need artificial dyes in jams, jellies, or preserves unless you're adding a bunch of extra bullshit that overtakes the fruit's natural color beyond the sugar and pectin.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Nah I'd bet it's for better sales beyond reasonable shelf life, fight against oxidation discoloration causing a miniscule drop in sales close to the sell by date.

The difference it makes is marginal but when you lead sales in anything, marginal changes are like millions of dollars.

[–] candyman337@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Companies announcing this like they're doing it because it's good when it's really it's because of a hair brained mandate by RFK

[–] Forester@pawb.social 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean he's a crazy nut but I'm kind of behind this one. I do not think we should be dying our food to make it look more palatable

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Removing artificial coloring doesn’t mean they’ll no longer be dyeing food, it means they’ll be using bugs (cochineal) and algae to do it, along with other natural dyes.

[–] candyman337@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes thank you all this changes is it'll be harder for brands to produce dues and that cost will be passed onto the customer

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

If it was just a cost thing I wouldn’t necessarily mind, but it hasn’t been established that natural dyes are always safer than artificial ones. Sometimes taking a lot of a natural thing and concentrating it also concentrates what would otherwise be a low level contaminant that wasn’t concerning, because you’d never consume enough of the non-concentrated thing for it to matter.

[–] candyman337@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Yes that is also a concern, I agree

[–] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Haven't artificial dyes been banned from most countries because they cause cancer and shit? Fuck RFK but this one seems actually beneficial.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago

Not all artificial dyes. I'm sure some have. And some natural dyes, like logwood, are toxic.

[–] candyman337@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That's not even remotely true

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 days ago

While I support this, my grape jelly is about to look weird.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I think this is great... maybe it'll cut costs

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

For the companies, yup. For the consumers, absolutely not. They'll probably charge even more for the less-adulterated products... Line. Must. Go. Up.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago
[–] TheRealAsmodeus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Excellent news!!!

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

Unlikely. If it was cheaper to use natural dyes, they'd probably already be doing it.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 9 points 2 days ago

Now do hfcs.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago

Why not announce it when you’ve done it? Intent only gets you so far.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 3 points 2 days ago

Cool, fine by me!

[–] 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 2 days ago

Nothing of theirs comes to mind that you'd even have to dye in the first place, hell half their products could probably be used as a dye.

[–] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

JM Smucker and JK Simmons need a buddy cop situation

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

this seems like wisdom very few wizards possess.. magnificent

[–] astrsk@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago

Doubt this is gonna lower prices. I’ll still only buy local jams and jellies.