this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

NFL

50 readers
5 users here now

A place for NFL news, game highlights and everything that excites you about American Football.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Before diving in, I just want to wish everyone a nice holiday week, and safe travels to all those doing so.

NFL 2023 - Offensive Line Rankings

If you are interested in the Math & Methodology just keep reading, or for even more: NFL 2023 - Comparative Offensive Line Ratings

If you are math adverse and just want to read the team offensive line capsules (all the charts and data are still there if you wish to review them): NFL 2023 - Offensive Line Rankings

TLDR: Just look at the last 2 columns on the main chart posted below.

Example Offensive Line Capsule

NY Giants Offensive Line Capsule

The Role & Metrics of the Offensive Line

For the offensive line ratings, we are going to assume that the offensive line's 4 main objectives are:

  • Open holes for the rushing game
  • Identify, adjust and negate blitzes
  • Protect the quarterback for a reasonable amount of time
  • Win & hold blocks as a unit

In addition, like any other player or unit on the field, they should accomplish this without drawing fouls.  Since this is basically a given for all units/players, I won't list it as a main objective, but offensive lines will be scored on their ability to avoid costly penalties.

NFL 2023 - Offensive Line Metrics & Ratings - The main chart is listed alphabetically. The final columns show the rankings in descending order.

The List of Offensive Line Metrics

  • Rushing Yards Before Contact x 2
  • Blitz %
  • Pressure %
  • Blitz Deflection %
  • Average Pocket Time
  • Sack %
  • Estimated Penalty Yards
  • Overall Block Win%

Let's look at each objective and identify the metric(s) used to measure the line's effectiveness.

Opening Holes For The Rushing Game

Clearly one of the offensive line's main tasks is to run block effectively.  An offensive line that cannot run block and create opportunities for ball carriers is going to find itself forced into a lot of predictable pass block situations.  Without the threat of an effective running game, defensive players can sit on pass routes and pass rushers can pin their ears back.

The metric to be used to measure run block effectiveness is Rushing Yards Before Contact(YBC), and this will be the only rushing metric used..  While  the ball carrier's ability is certainly a part of the metric, the size of the hole, or the time until the first defender can make contact with a ball carrier, is primarily a result of blocking.  And while wide receivers and tight end blocking is also a factor, we can simply assume that all wr/te blocks are equal(which they surely are not), and assume these blocks are simply an extension of the line blocking(or that the wr/te in the play assume linemen status for the play).

Because the run game can in and of itself win ball games, and an effective run game compliments an effective pass game, the value of this metric will be doubled(the score each line receives for this metric is multiplied by two).  Thus the score you see in the Standardized YBC column is the sd value, and the next column shows the YBC score(its SD value * 2).

Pivot tables were needed to sum up totals like every players that has rushed the ball for each time to calculate YBC. You will see more of them below.

Pivot Table for YBC for each team. If we expanded the table you would see every player that has rushed ther ball for each team along with their respective stats.

Identifying, Adjust To, And Negate Blitzes

This is probably the most difficult and important task assigned to the offensive line.  Before providing time for a quarterback to throw, the line must identify the pass rushers, call the line protection, and still be aware of any misidentifications or additional blitzers not accounted for pre-snap.  If any of this goes wrong without a blitz, it can lead to a negative play.  When it goes wrong with a blitz, the potential for disasterous outcomes rises significantly.

We are going to assign three metrics to measuring this task:

Blitz % - An offensive line that faces a high amount of blitzing will score more higher in this metric.  The purpose of this metric is to measure the amount of blitzes the line has had to face while producing the stats it has.  It should be clear that a line facing 30% blitz % who gave up just 5 sacks, is probably more effective than a line who faced a 15% blitz % and gave up 5 sacks.  Either the blitz pickup of the latter line is not good OR they are getting beat without a blitz.

Pressure % - Pressure % is simply the amount of hurries, knockdowns and sacks as a cumulative total, changed into a percentage by dividing that sum by the amount of pass attempts, scrambles & sacks.  It assigns equal weight to a knockdown, a hurry and a sack even though they each have different Expected Point values, and affects on down/distance/outcome.

For measuring purposes, offensive lines that allow the least amount of pressure will score highest.

Blitz Deflection % - This is a metric you have never heard of because I just made it up.  I am defining Blitz Deflection % as [1 - (Pressure % / Blitz %)].  Let's look at a simple example of what it is and why it may be a valuable metric.

Let's assume a line has faced a Blitz % of 25%.  Let's also assume, that every blitz leads directly to pressure.  Thus a Blitz % of 25% should lead to a Pressure % of 25%.  Essentially, blitzes always work.  Thus if a team faces 25% Blitzes, then the average line would allow 25% pressure.

A line that could keep pressure % BELOW Blitz % would be doing a better job than a line who's Pressure % was higher than their Blitz %.  If this happens the line must be giving up pressure outside the Blitz and negating little to none of the blitzes sent.

Looking at the chart, Baltimore's offensive line has faced the blitz on 30.68% of designed passing plays.  Their pressure % is a mere 14.49%.  While this cannot show the exact breakdown of how often Baltimore's offensive line picked up the blitz and how many time they allowed pressure without a blitz, it should be obvious that line is picking up blitzes.

The ratio [1 - (14.49% / 30.68%)] = 52.78%.  Thus Baltimore's offensive line is deflecting 52.78% of blitzes.

Conversely, let's take a look at Pittsburgh's offensive line in this metric.  The Steelers Offensive line faces a blitz 18.08% of the time(by far the lowest % in the league, Cincinnati is second least blitzed at 21.61%).  However the Steeler offensive line allows a pressure % of 25.32%.

The ratio [1-(25.32 / 18.08%)] = -40.35%.  The Steeler's line is not deflecting any blitzes and giving up pressure outside of being blitzed.

Just remember Blitz Deflection is not measuring the actual amount of blitz pickups, but the theoretical amount a line is negating blitzes.

The Blitz % Data

Protect the Quarterback for a Reasonable Amount of Time

Regardless as to whether the blitz pickup has been identified and executed properly, the offensive line is still tasked with giving the quarterback enough time to go through his reads and complete the passing motion.  It would be great if the qb is still standing and in the pocket when this is completed, but sometimes things go wrong and quarterbacks get sacked.

The two metrics being used in this portion of the offensive line ratings are fairly straightforward.

Average Time in The Pocket - The amount of time the quarterback has before contact or being flushed is average time in the pocket.  It should follow that allowing more time for the quarterback would be good, and allowing less time bad.

This is a bit of scheming that plays into this as some times have an extremely quick read system that inherently gets the ball out faster than other schemes looking for deeper, or double, routes. But it is a fairly reliable indicator on the ability of the line to pass protect and form a workable qb pocket.

Sack % - Sacks are the worst kind of pressure as they come with loss of down and yardage by the very definition of a sack.  This is an inverse metric in that it is better to have a lower sack % than a higher one.  Lines that allow a lower % of sack will score well, while porous lines will score poorly.

Minimize Penalties

Another metric in measuring offensive lines will be their ability to avoid getting in their own way.  Every penalty on each individual line is collected and the entire line is responsible for the total penalties.

Pivot table summarizing every lineman's penalties for each team

For estimating penalty yardage, a false start is 5 yards, holding and any other penalty is 10 yards(the other penalties are a mix of 5 yard and 15 yard infractions, thus I decided to use 10 yards as the punishement for each.  Offsetting and declined penalties are still counted.  Multiplying out the types of penalties and the estimated yardage for each results in an estimated total penalty yardage total for each offensive line.  This is also an inverse metric.  Lines that have been penalized the most will score poorly, while the mistake free lines will score high.

Winning Blocks - Overall Offensive Line Blocking Win Rate

The final metric is another metric you may not have seen before, Overall Block Win Rate.   To calculate this metric, ESPN's Pass Blocking Win Rate and Rush Blocking Win Rate percentages were used for each team(which just so happened to be published this week).

ESPN Win Block Rates for Passing and Rushing - Note how compact rush block win % is, the highest 72% is ranked 7th and lowest 70% is ranked 25th. The 7th rank Pass block win rate is 64% and the 25th best is 50%, a much bigger range.

Then the breakdown between passing and running plays for each team were taken into account.  To find the overall block win rate, the pass block win rate was multiplied by the passing play %, and the rush block win rate was multiplied by the rush play %.  Turning the resulting metric back into a percentage, leads to overall block win rate.

For example, a team has a pass block win rate of 60% and a rush block win rate of 70%.  They pass 60% of the time and run 40% of the time.  What is the overall block win %?

Overall Block Win % = [(0.60*60)+(0.70*40)]/100 = 64%

You can see all the data and calculation in the main chart.  Perhaps you think everything before this section is nonsense and overall block win rate % is the true measure of offensive lines.  In that case, here is the ranking based solely on Overall Block Win Rate %

Overall Block Win Rate when pass/run ratio is factored in.

Final Offensive Line Ratings & Rankings

Summing up the score from the 8 metrics(and doubling the YBC value), we arrive at a final rating for each of the 32 offensive lines.  Like any rating system there are sure to be disagreements and niggles in the methodology. 

The Offensive Line Ratings see Baltimore, Philadelphia, Miami, & the LA Rams as the having the best offensive lines.   It sees Houston, Pittsburgh, Carolina, and the extremely woeful NY Giants as having the worst performing offensive lines thus far in 2023.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] srjohnson2@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Anyone with eyes can see the biggest problem with the Bears o-line is Fields.

[–] bauboish@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

This is the PFF grades fwiw. Keep in mind that PFF does rank based on what they think the line will be for the upcoming week. Rather than aggregate performance.

1 Lions 2 Ravens 3 Colts 4 Eagles 5 Vikings 6 Falcons 7 Cowboys 8 Chiefs 9 Dolphins 10 Bills 11 Texans 12 Bucs 13 Broncos 14 Raiders 15 Browns 16 Steelers 17 Saints 18 Packers 19 Jaguars 20 Niners 21 Commanders 22 Chargers 23 Bengals 24 Bears 25 Seahawks 26 Patriots 27 Rams 28 Cardinals 29 Panthers 30 Giants

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bumfuzzled_Hobgoblin@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

I didn’t think it was possible to do worse than us but I knew Washington would pull through!

[–] NitroSparger@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

I'm not gonna pretend to know a whole lot about OL play, but two of KCs highest categories are pocket time and sack %, which has a lot more to do with Mahomes than the OL.

[–] Dumachus156984@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Why the hell is blitz% an offensive line metric?

[–] Girthwurm_Jim@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

The fact that we are not dead last on this list completely invalidates it for me.

[–] gyman122@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Great stuff! Love to see this kind of work being done in-season

[–] Higgins8585@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

I'm so tired of every year having a bad line. It's mostly coaching, scheme for sure but talent isn't there.

Look at any of the top lines, they probably have 2 very good linemen and 3 good ones. Bengals only have 2 good ones (Orlando, Karras), one pretty good (Jonah), 1 meh (Cappa, regressed this year) and 1 trash (Volson).

Even if bengals change scheme and coaching they need some upgrades at guard.

[–] COVID_DEEZ_NUTS@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Maybe this will shut up Panthers fans who keep saying Stroud is more successful because of his oline play. We are playing well despite our o-line, which is broken and using 3rd stringers at multiple positions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZachTrillson@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Every day I get more proof that the Ravens are the best team in the league

Super Bowl XLVII rematch incoming

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Astaphor@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Kind of crazy how our line has still been as good as it’s been with all the injuries and playing a 7th round second year guy at LT

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ninjalo1@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Yup. This seems accurate. The O-Line cost(specifically Steele) us against the Eagles. On top of the beatdown the 49ers dealt.

The Cardinals just seemed like a very Dallas thing to do. I put that off on every facet of that game.

[–] Corr521@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Vikings finally have one of the best OLs in the league and Kirk has a season ending injury...

[–] Pittyswains@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

NYJ having one of the better pocket times but just miserable in everything else. Is this a result of ZW being awful? Feel like defenses can just constantly blitz because he can’t read and react to it.

[–] jaguar_28@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The jaguars line offends me that’s for sure

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fishounds2@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Somehow Washington isn't the worst

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sarcagain115@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Chiefs have had 12 holding penalties? Damn. It's felt like a lot but that's... Not ideal. I'm surprised we're so low on "other penalties" - felt like Jawaan Taylor was getting at least two illegal formation penalties ever game weeks 2-5. I bet that's not being picked up.

[–] saudiaramcoshill@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Titans ranked 31st by PFF, 21st by you. Not that PFF is the bible, but the eye test strongly favors their methodology. You've gotta clean up weightings or something because there isn't a chance in hell the Titans aren't bottom 5 in the NFL. Bottom 3 is more likely.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Around_the_campfire@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Wow, our offensive line is apparently in a shape befitting a former Olineman as GM.

[–] Vendetta_2023@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Wait, the Rams are ranked 4th and the Lions 12th? What is this nonsense. Lions are top 3 easily.

[–] Wet_Bubble_Fart@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Wait is this telling me that it's not Geno Smith's fault? Holy shit Seattles offensive line is atrocious

[–] demonicpixiestix@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

How in the holy fuck are we overall #4?

I'm not disputing any part of your evaluation, but I'm just so flabbergasted. How? How are we doing all these good things and just... nothing to show for it.

[–] mikerhoa@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Man this is going to make the Zach Wilson truthers' heads explode. They've been swearing up and down that Jets' line is the worst in the history of the sport.

[–] GogettheDrill@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Now you guys see why Trevor has not been playing as well as he should be

[–] Original_Wear_6635@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Is any fanbase happy with their oline? Everyone always comments that their oline sucks

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bread_meat_cheese@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Impressive. Very nice… Lets see Paul Allen’s offensive line metrics and rankings.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NotUpInHurr@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (4 children)

There ain't no way the Titans' O-Line should be ranked this high. We couldn't block a kid in crutches lmao

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Awesomeg11@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (4 children)

The conclusions drawn by different places when ranking olines is so interesting. Its also interesting to see the difference in opinion from watchers of the game and people / sites that meticulously rank olines. Everybody minus eagles fans but including baltimore fans think their oline is horrible. Good to know for us that the baltimore line is actually really good (which is a conclusion both you and pff have drawn).

[–] BuffOrange@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

I've been saying this for years. It's always the OC or OLs fault. Third is the WR who gets open all the time and drops it once in a while.

[–] wierdjokes@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Our oline performance is somewhat inflated because teams are trying to contain Lamar too. Defenses have to respect that he can simply take off.

That being said, Baltimore's oline has also actually been good.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AssinineAssassin@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Other than some poor false starts in home games, our line has played very well.

I don’t know many fans that think our O-Line has been horrible this season.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] The-Implication-0@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Our O Line is gonna be so good next year if we find a competent center and Teven Jenkins stays healthy. Also if we can find a QB who doesn’t hold onto the ball forever…

[–] shellsquad@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

If the Oline has improved since Fields last played, then in theory, Fields should be able to make more throws and take less sacks. These next few games will leave little doubt about him moving forward, and Fields truthers will either be very loud or cease to exist. The latter is still unlikely, but they will be shut down quickly if they make excuses again.

[–] CopaceticVindication@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

This is literally the 2nd time basically since I started watching football that the dolphins oline isnt absolute dogshit lol.

[–] BendubzGaming@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Only 61% success rate when we have the best Tackle in football is shocking

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ShopCartRicky@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Jacksonville's line should honestly be worse. If Trevor wasn't so good at getting the ball out quick and moving in the pocket, he'd be contending with Howell for sacks.

To add a little more context, Trevor's preferred method to move/escape in the pocket is to step forward and our guards and center are routinely in line to sit on his lap like a mall Santa.

[–] notmoleliza@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

49ers OL is similar in regards to pass pro. Run blocking has traditionally been fine. But if they didnt have Jimmy's super fast release or Purdys short area shiftyness 49ers QBs would be permanently concussed.

My nickname for former QB CJ Beatherd is the Iron Pinata because of how many times he got blown up and getting back uo

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SmoothFred@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago
[–] croissant_titty@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (4 children)

This is bullshit because it doesn’t say my oline is the best

[–] SuddenSurplus@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

but that just means Goff/Gibbs/Montgomery are doing more with less.....

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Patchy_Face_Man@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (6 children)

Here’s something disgusting: Our line has been 100% healthy the entire season. Fuck.

[–] onetimequestion66@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I feel like you guys keep throwing money at good lineman I genuinely don’t understand how it’s consistently so bad

[–] Patchy_Face_Man@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Coaching. As others have said. Play calling hurts to. Barely running the ball is no fun for the line and sets them up to fail.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] 15blairm@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

OP is obsessed with playing around in excel midseason

[–] rockiesfan4ever@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

This is interesting and I wonder if you could take YPC for RB, subtract out the YBC and then see how well they are at "extending" plays and breaking tackles

[–] CodyNorthrup@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

I hate our OL so much outside of literally only Trent

[–] Deep-Secret@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

My only take on your entire post is that I hate how you chose to represent the Chiefs with KAN instead of KC. It took me a while to find us lol

[–] notmyplantaccount@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

They look like the abbreviations from the old Tecmo Super Bowl game, so I'm kinda ok with it.

[–] LightningMcDream@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] paak-maan@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Given that we’re much higher than I expected on here I genuinely couldn’t find us for a long time.

load more comments
view more: next ›