this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2025
271 points (98.2% liked)

Science Memes

16009 readers
3416 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 219 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)
[–] Goun@lemmy.ml 105 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 94 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Makes download speeds great, but upload drops off a cliff

[–] Goun@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

You another fan behind your phone facing towards the router

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 5 points 2 weeks ago

not if you mount the fan on the ceiling, and let it lift up the air

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

...never stops buffering.

[–] Redfox8@mander.xyz 4 points 2 weeks ago

I sell the truth, that is my fan. Mits off! You now owe me $5.

[–] Gyroplast@pawb.social 55 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I still have a soft spot for troll physics. Needs more magnets, though.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 weeks ago

would you be interested in talking to a scientist?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 weeks ago

What astounds me is despite being a crappy drawing, the person drew that fan with proper perspective and proportion.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yeah, but that makes the waves more choppy and stormlike which increases degradation of the equipment on the other side as the waves collide more strongly against it.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The moving parts could disturb MIMO

[–] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So better use a fanless Dyson fan? 🤔

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] agegamon@beehaw.org 4 points 1 week ago

NSFW

~~Only~~ Wififans 😳

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] zxqwas@lemmy.world 102 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It will probably reflect some of the radiation. Wifi reception will be poorer behind the aluminium and possibly better in front.

A cheapskates version of a directional antenna.

[–] raltoid@lemmy.world 43 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

Indeed, although this type of thing was more common with older wifi generations, so I'm not surprised kids these days wont know.

For example: We cut the top off an old beer can, poked a hole and stuck it onto the antenna to have stable download speeds across a courtyard.

[–] Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

I remember like 15 or 20 years ago the popular thing was printable papercraft doohickeys that you'd cut out and glue together with aluminum foil on the backside that were like little satellite dishes that mounted on the antennas that were supposed to boost/aim your wifi signal. I gave them a try, but if they made a difference it wasn't big enough to be noticeable.

[–] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 weeks ago

Reminds me of the diy antenna made out of copper wire, an empty CD spool and a single CD on its back. Those antennas could work as far as 1km if there was no obstruction, or 400m through light obstructions. It was awesome.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Clearwater@lemmy.world 77 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I unironically do something similar to this. In my area, the only options are a dogshit local WISP, Starlink/other satellite, or (where possible) cellular.

I am one of the "lucky" people who are able to use cell for my internet, however whether it's the cell company having a craptastic network, software/hardware bugs on the my customer equipment, or a combination of both, there is only ONE cell tower I can connect to which yields a useful connection.

All other towers result in the equipment failing to connect to the tower, connecting but failing to get an internet connection, or only yielding download speeds 5Mbit of less.

I have found that by shoving sheet metal around my ISP's equipment, I can quite easily block off the non-functional towers and ensure they're never connected to. I don't think speeds are any better, but it does help with reliability.

[–] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I wonder if it's not only boxing the other towers but also boring the signal to the one you are aiming at, because you put a big mirror behind

[–] knightly@pawb.social 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Both to some degree, realistically. I used an old collander as a signal reflector for a wifi dongle on the end of a USB extension cable and was able to boost the signal up to about 4x, or maybe half the range of the purpose-built and highly directional Yagi antenna I eventually bought to replace that kludge.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 42 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Long live the Pringles cantenna

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

~~pringles can is too small for 2.4ghz cantenna,~~ it's near cutoff frequency but just barely, you need 10cm-ish diameter can or shorter 16cm-ish can

[–] Pencilnoob@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I once made one of these with a bigger can and mounted it on an old 10' satellite dish. Managed to get Wi-Fi across several thousand yards without issue

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Wardriving intensifies

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago

Keeps out the conspiracy-based posts and only lets facts through.

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 5 points 1 week ago

I can't tell if this is legit or an elaborate troll.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 weeks ago

I have put my router in a 4 m parabol antenna, with this the signal has also improved somewhat, it only prevents me from using the sofa that is next to the router.

[–] roserose56@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 week ago

I did this back in 2010-13, to get better internet in my house! It was a video from a youtube, where he used cereal box with aluminum.

[–] LostXOR@fedia.io 17 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This can actually be beneficial if your router is right at the corner of your house. The foil acts as a reflector for some of the radiation that would've been wasted, and thus improves the signal quality within your house.

[–] zout@fedia.io 49 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

To actually be beneficial as a reflector, the foil would need to be a specific distance from the antenna, which should be a certain fraction of the wavelength. Source: I used to make parabolic reflectors out of milk cartons about twenty years ago.

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 7 points 2 weeks ago

This is basic interference physics.

[–] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 36 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I am 80% sure this is a net loss with modern mu-mimo radios, and it will absolutely trash your phy rate

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 19 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

MU-MIMO (Multiple-User Multiple In Multiple Out) does [math] to assist in directing signal to multiple clients at once via multipathing, which this reflector would fuck with the math of in (I think) a detrimental way. Regardless of its impact on that technology, higher-end wifi phy rates (the negotiated modulation rate between 2 stations, i.e. the wifi access point/router and your phone) would get shredded by having a reflector bouncing signal between the multiple antennas, forcing clients into artificially lower speeds for a [potential] marginal boost to gain.

This stopped being a helpful thing to do somewhere around the transition between wifi 4 and 5 (802.11n --> 802.11ac)

[–] keepcarrot@hexbear.net 11 points 2 weeks ago

I remember going to a LAN that got its wifi from a local library via collander-boosting. Those were the days, and carrying around CRT monitors was sort of like exercise

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] three@lemmy.zip 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Geodad@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

In all different directions...

Back in my day, we used a Pringles can.

[–] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

When I was a kid we would connect a coat hanger to the TV to get the news from 2 towns over

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We still do. It's a fun trick.

[–] Geodad@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

I still go war-driving from time to time. 🙂

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Remember windsurfers? You put them on the single antenna of your old linsky router.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not as effective as the anti-5G wire cages.

[–] Glitterbomb@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I stumbled onto these on Amazon last night actually. The user submitted video reviews are insane. I was screaming. I got to the head scarf that blocks the 5Gs and I had to stop.

EMF BLOCKING BASEBALL CAP

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] loomy@lemy.lol 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That is indeed a photograph of something someone has done

[–] loomy@lemy.lol 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›