this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
1034 points (99.0% liked)

Comic Strips

18205 readers
3534 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 134 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Teacher: See, I told you there were real world applications for limits

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 59 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The real question is, to how many iterations does the hamster say "Eh, good enough"

[–] essell@lemmy.world 61 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] Asetru@feddit.org 30 points 2 days ago (2 children)

No need to be insulting. What's a guinea?

[–] essell@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

What a high class lady like your granny used to charge

[–] vonxylofon@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A coin equal to 1 pound and 1 shilling.

Then what's a new guinea, and why does everyone talk about their father?

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah but it's clearly a malicious hamster giving the haircut

[–] essell@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Can I get that printed on a t-shirt?

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago

Well, there's the problem! It's only half off for his protection - nobody likes hair in their cuye.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Well, "hairs" are quantized phenomenon...

So at some finite time, it will be all gone. At least if the thing is happening fast enough for it not to grow back at a similar time-frame.

[–] syklemil@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Kinda. At the last strand I expect them to switch to length.

But yeah, at some point should be good enough

It's already about length.
The guinea pig's hair is getting cut, not ripped out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 3 points 2 days ago

Thankfully there is a finite number of hairs, if we don't consider hair length as another variable

[–] reboot6675@sopuli.xyz 47 points 2 days ago (2 children)

When I was a kid I encountered this problem when I wondered what would happen if I half-empty a bottle of soda, re-fill it with water, and repeat. Will it eventually become just water or will there always be some soda left? It boggled my mind for a while, then I forgot about it until I reached university calculus haha

[–] ButteryMonkey@piefed.social 53 points 2 days ago (4 children)

You invented homeopathy! Just with more steps (literally).

[–] sxan@midwest.social 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You mean less steps. True homeopathy dilutes until there's no measurable amount of the substance left; it's just pure sugar/water/alcohol. You're supposedly getting benefits from "the vibrations."

Of all the pseudo-science quackery, homeopathy is one of the most idiot-prone.

[–] ButteryMonkey@piefed.social 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No, I do mean more steps, because homeopathy dilutes a smaller volume of target material, they actually would perform fewer steps than dilution via halving.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Homeopathy often dilutes by taking far less than half of a solution and diluting it in a large amount of fresh solvent. One process repeatability empties the entire container and refills it with solvent.

If you were diluting something by replacing only half with solvent, you'd have to do many more steps to get as pure solvent as homeopathy produces.

Homeopathy is a tremendously wasteful way of washing a container. It's hugely wasteful, and being a homeopathic environmentalist is oxymoronic.

[–] ButteryMonkey@piefed.social 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That’s exactly what I mean.

The soda dilution by halves would have far more dilution steps to reach pure water than homeopathy.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ah. I read you backwards, by bad.

[–] ButteryMonkey@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago

All good, language is freakin hard, man!

All that matters is we got there in the end :)

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

I get benefits from sugar water alcohol.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The answer is that eventually all trace of the soda would be gone because there are only a finite number of atoms of "soda-stuff" and eventually you'll end up with a situation where there's only one molecule left, which - assuming that wasn't the water part of soda in the first place - will have a 50% chance of being in the half that's removed before the next dilution step. Theoretically it could survive infinitely many rounds of this, but the chance of that is basically zero.

How many times is that though? For a litre of soda, the lower bound is about 85. A hundred ought to be more than enough. (And 300 times would be enough to dilute the entire observable universe assuming it was soluble in water, so that's a reasonable upper bound.)

You'd almost certainly stop tasting the soda quite a while before that though. After 20 dilutions you're into parts per million soda to water.

Things become more complicated if you replace the soda in this experiment with holy water. It seems to be agreed that 50/50 holy to regular water remains holy, but after that, some believe that dilution can be repeated forever (presumably being left to sit for a while after that step) while others claim the holiness disappears once the dilution goes beyond 51%, regardless.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 3 points 1 day ago

It's easy to test for water holiness. If you drop the bottle and it bursts into flame molotov-cocktail style, it is still holy water.

Source : Belmont et al., Wallachia, 1986

[–] racketlauncher831@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

"If something can happen, it will happen."

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 day ago

Zeno's Barber

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The sum of all haircuts is 2.

[–] kogasa@programming.dev 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 7 points 1 day ago

If you sum the hair removed from one lil guy you'll get 1. If you sum the hair removed from all lil guys you'll get the amount of lil guys.

But yeah, you're right. I think they're looking at the problem differently. We don't care about how much hair it has at each step. It can't gain hair from a hair cut.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 0ops@piefed.zip 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well there's a discrete number of hairs on that rodent thing, depending how the barber rounds they'll have to cut the last hair eventually. Unless they only cut half of the last hair?

[–] kamen@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

... then they cut one half of the remaining half.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Finite number of hair cells

[–] kamen@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Finite number of atoms as well, and yet scientists can split those too.

[–] FundMECFS@quokk.au 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At this point you’re splitting hairs… wait…

[–] voodooattack@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

You madlad. This is the greatest comment I’ve ever seen

[–] Jerb322@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I remember a comedian that had a joke similar to this. He had a volunteer come on stage, handed them a piece of paper and ask them to rip it in half. Then he told them "continue to rip it in half and eventually you'll hear a large Bang".

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I mean technically there isn't a finite number of atoms because there isn't a finite number of anything because everything is part of the same energy field with varied energy states caught in self reinforcing patterns and when you "split" an atom you simply break the pattern allowing rapid entropy to a stable state.

Tldr: the solution to this paradox is that it is impossible to split anything in half, you can only rearrange it.

[–] TomMasz@piefed.social 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Zeno tried to warn us, but did we listen? Noooooo!

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Well, I listened to half of his argument...

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

it took me a while to understand that the guinea pig(?) in the window is meant to be the reflection of the one outside. Because the surface is roughly parallel with the viewer, the one outside is pointing to the left, so the flipped pig should also be pointing left.

[–] Thavron@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago

Yes the artist doesnt seem to understand reflections.

[–] Kcap@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

"The haircut does not exist!"

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

beat me to it

[–] CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago
[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Should have centered your axis around the global center instead of the local center.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Go six to eight times, then ask another barber to do the rest and a huge discount.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BandanaBug@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is one of those times you are hoping someone put Nair in the conditioner. It's rare to yearn for, but that little guy needs the help

load more comments
view more: next ›