this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2025
495 points (99.4% liked)

politics

24944 readers
3287 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ReiRose@lemmy.world 38 points 6 days ago (2 children)

She wasn't even "promiscuous". That absolutely shouldn't Legally matter and doesn't morally matter at all, but the physician wasn't even going for low hanging fruit: she had been with the same man for 15 years and they had a 13yo together?? They were essentially married. Stfu dumb ass physician.

I hope it goes all the way to the Supreme Court (not that she should have to) and I like to think if I ever met said physician I would suddenly recieve divine intervention that, morally, no doctors should have Achilles tendons.

[–] moistclump@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Agreed. But also, i wouldn’t trust anything in the hands of the Supreme Court right now.

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 28 points 6 days ago (1 children)

She was not the property of a man. That's the standard by which these people assess women

[–] ReiRose@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

My gods i wish you were wrong

[–] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 40 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

Not being married doesn't make her less pregnant. What the hell do these people think they're doing for a living -- are they gonna take care of potential babies, or are they there to preach?

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 27 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It's about propagating the religion- the lives of the people are unimportant. The religion grows by enforcing a set of customs, and anyone who doesn't comply is threatened with ostracism or violence

[–] zigmus64@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If they helped her medically, she could live and thrive while not conforming to their rules. They are afraid of other women under their thumb realizing the grass is greener and also pursuing such a nonconforming lifestyle. They know deep inside that their beliefs only are preserved through coercion

[–] zigmus64@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

I meant the ostracism or violence part. It was meant to be tongue in cheek…

It’s certainly making me want to become more religious. /s

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 20 points 6 days ago

They want her to die.

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

“They’re someone else’s problem.”

[–] leftthegroup@lemmings.world 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Picket that doctor's house. Make an example of them and make sure it ends badly (bad from the doctor's pov). Career ending as best case scenario.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] leftthegroup@lemmings.world 2 points 6 days ago

Apparently the whole practice.

We need a freedom "from" religion amendment to the constitution.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

She really should do a crowdfunding and get the heck out of there. Tennessee is trying to kill her and her child.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

How would you solve this problem?

  • Crowdfund participants will want to verify her identity
  • If her identity is exposed, she might get murdered for Jesus
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 1 points 6 days ago

Considering that a grifter used a USB cable up their nose to fake cancer, I don't think it would be an issue for a pregnant woman to get crowdfunding. It is VERY clear that Turdpublicans hate women and their bodily autonomy.

As to the later, Tennessee would kill her anyway through a definite lack of medical care. I think picking up stakes and leaving for civilization would be safer by default.

[–] Yetanotherpaolo@feddit.nl 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Dox the doctor and help him to exit this mortal coil. Along with everyone who thinks this is ok.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 110 points 1 week ago
[–] dastanktal@lemmy.ml 108 points 1 week ago (1 children)

When she reached staff at Sen. Bill Hagerty’s office, they told her, “he’s not obligated to listen to his constituents.”

I fucking hate this country's political system.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 55 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Please tie your message to a brick and gently place it on his desk through the window.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lennee@lemmy.world 87 points 1 week ago (7 children)

as a european I might just not understand the nuance of this but WHAT IN THE FUCK?

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 days ago

Well America has always been the home of the free. Its in their national anthem and a huge part of their cultural identity.

For example, you're free to perform your own bodily functions such a procreation in any way you wish, provided that you're participating in a state sanctioned marriage, and that you belong to a demographic which is desirable to the state, and that your DNA does not contain any markers for undesirable traits, and that you express continued loyalty to the supreme leader eternal.

Its such an enlightened way of life.

[–] DBT@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

As an American, I also say WHAT IN THE FUCK to this.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 95 points 1 week ago (5 children)

The 2025 Medical Ethics Defense Act allows physicians to deny care to patients whose lifestyles they disagree with

“It’s absolutely not ‘pro-life’ — and not very Christian either,” said Rep. Gloria Johnson (D-Knoxville), as she shared the woman’s story after the town hall. “And who else are they not going to treat? I had a friend say: what about someone who’s addicted to drugs or alcohol, or who’s struggling with mental health? If you can just refuse treatment to anyone whose lifestyle you disagree with — that’s not medical ethics. That’s fascism.”

[–] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 11 points 6 days ago

Yikes

Patient Registration Questionnaire Question 856. Patient's preferred computer operating system (OS): Ubuntu LTS

"Yeah, sorry buddy, we don't serve your kind in these offices."

[–] lennee@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Sounds like an attack on medical ethics to me, how is that a defense?

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 week ago

Its just like any other super henious piece of legislation that removes human rights. They give it some sweet helpful sounding name (eg. Patriot Act) so when anyone votes against it they can point fingers and say "THIS COMMUNIST HATES PATRIOTS!" or (eg. Kids Online Safety Act) "THIS EVIL BASTARD DOESNT WANT TO PROTECT KIDS!!!"

Its a fascist habit as old as time itself.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bacon_pdp@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A bunch of American men believe women should not have sex outside of marriage (except with them of course, where women are expected to be nymphomaniac whores).

Basically completely unrealistic and unreasonable shitty people

[–] Beebabe@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

These are the ones upset about being lonely

[–] lena@gregtech.eu 23 points 1 week ago

You understand it, it's fucking insane so your reaction is normal.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 63 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I hate how religious people are given permission to discriminate. Someone else's religion has nothing to do with me. I shouldn't be constrained by a religion that isn't mine and if someone can't provide care based on their religion, then they have no business being in the profession. None at all.

[–] demunted@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"religious freedoms"... Yet cannot find any associated practice in their religious teachings.....

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago
[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ironically, they are going directly against the teachings of the book they claim to love and study daily. The New Testament is full of warnings to treat others as you would be treated, love your neighbor, accept others as they are, abandon worldly concerns and improve yourself before judging others, etc etc. I'm just a bitter atheist pointing out the ridiculous state of their "faith"

[–] Souroak@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 6 days ago

As they say: No hate like Christian 'love.'

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BaroqueInMind@piefed.social 32 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I can bet a significant amount of money the mother is black and they are simply being racist pieces of shit.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

How and when did Tennessee become worse than Texas and Florida? That’s the home of genuine living saint Dolly Parton, isn’t it? Every time I think I can’t become more disgusted by the U.S. I see a story like this. The ongoing gleeful predation and harm of vulnerable people, both domestic and foreign, is beyond the pale. Peaceful options have failed, and all that is left is descent to unimaginable levels of suffering and depravity and, eventually, violence. And all this at a time where the planet is literally dying and we should be doing everything in our power as a species to claw it back. It’s hard not to feel hopeless.

We’ve been considering moving back to B.C. but the way things are going I think that would only buy us a little time. This problem with fascism, capitalism, and general inhumanity is a global problem and there is no escape.

Sorry folks, I usually try to be more hopeful and solution-oriented, but this hit hard today.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago

How and when did Tennessee become worse than Texas and Florida?

When Haslam retired. Which he did because he saw the writing on the wall that there was no longer a place for him.

Haslam wasn't good, but as a corporate lackey, he just wanted to keep the machine running, he wasn't ideologically committed to all the christofascist culture war bullshit, and would push back on it when it would rock the boat too much. For a few years, he held back the rising tide of fascism and the state was less bad than most of its neighbors. But as soon as he left, there was a massive wave of legislation making up for lost time. The people running things now are fascist idiots, whether ideologues or opportunists, unrestrained by conscience or reason. If Fox News runs a story about something, there will be legislation about it within a week.

How did things get this bad? Because the corporate lackies created the material conditions for it. They were happy to work with and spur on the christofascists because it gets them voting Republican. And now they've created a beast they can no longer control or restrain.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›