this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2025
184 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

75758 readers
4342 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 71 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Black Mirror had an episode about this.

Surprised it took someone this long to actually make it.

I forget the name of the episode. If you're curious, it's on Netflix, it's in season 3, and it's right before San Junipero. It was bleak AF, which is why the only happy (and arguably the best) Black Mirror episode came right after it.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 23 points 1 month ago

It's Shut Up and Dance, my fav

the only

I disagree. For starters there's also

Episodes from the first five seasons with happy endings (the way they're presented, at least), spoilers duhUSS Callister Hang the DJ Be Right Back (though the stakes aren't that high either) Arguably one from Bandersnatch

Also, I don't like San Junipero as much as others do because the final conflict goes way too fast and the way it was resolved felt abrupt. Still nice though

[–] CallateCoyote@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, with quite a plot twist. The entire time I was practically yelling at the tv “who cares, then let’s them release the video of you jerking off and own it. We all do it!” Then at the end, “… oh.”

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

Right, the part I don’t get is, the video of you isn’t going to include what you’re looking at. And if it does you can say they faked it. They could put anything there. They don’t have a shot that includes both you and the screen. They can get sound though, so they can match sound, but that can be faked too. Strip out the audio. Separate the sounds of what you were really watching from the ambient sounds (and the grunts/moans from you) and then dub those sounds over the new audio and it should be passable.

Also, I just wouldn’t do anything embarrassing with a camera pointed at me. I’d cover the camera or point it away from me. Even sitting on the toilet browsing, back cameras point down at the floor, front camera points up, maybe gets the top of my face? Nothing private is seen by the camera by my best intentions. I just do this naturally. I guess others don’t?

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 month ago

RATs existed for a long time but you needed to manually hit record I think? I’m assuming this is just some extra automation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stickly@lemmy.world 61 points 1 month ago
[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 58 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Been receiving emails about this for years now. Finally can trust those messages.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 53 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've been trusting them for years. It's a miracle that they were able to setup a webcam I've never owned in my life and have it filming where I always go to spank one out.

[–] zerofk@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

They did the same to me. I think they’ve got cameras set up all through my house. So I started walking around naked so they’ll have something nice to look at. I haven’t gotten a thank you yet though.

[–] gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com 42 points 1 month ago (4 children)

don't stream, download your porn from usenet like a civilised person

[–] rapchee@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

i get how usenet is better than streaming from a popup filled website, but i fail to see how it is better than torrenting
qbittorrent has built-in search as well

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You don’t understand the difference between Usenet and torrents.

[–] rapchee@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

i haven't used it, only read some available documentation, but it seems like a subscription service to access a server with stuff of dubious legality on it, but please correct me if i'm wrong. i kinda want to get into it but, as i was saying, i fail to see how it is better than torrenting

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

It’s better because it basically has everything that torrent sites have, since the same groups upload everything to both, but it’s all done over SSL encrypted connections so your ISP can’t see what you’re downloading, so you don’t need a VPN and you are downloading directly from servers so it’s much faster and you don’t have to worry about the number of seeders, nor do you have to seed yourself. You have many different providers you can sign up to, and many different indexers to help find what you are looking for. It also can download parts of the same content from different sources and combine them to make a whole.

Once you’ve tried it, torrenting feels so amateur and insecure and outdated. Ideally you just set up both, which is what I have done with transmission running in a docker container with a built in VPN, but the torrents are the “last resort” when the content I want can’t be found on Usenet - which is very rarely.

[–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Doesn't this also mean that the server can be a single point of failure? Whereas in a torrent swarm it's distributed and more resilient?

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's not like it's just some server in some persons house. They're hosted by companies on server farms that have guaranteed uptime figures and most have 2000+ day retention of data. I've been using it for 10+ years and have never had any server failure type issues.

[–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 month ago

I was thinking more about legal actions. But then again torrents need trackers and search sites. It seems like it's hard to shut down pirate bay though. I just have a feeling that usenet flies under the radar a bit, but if it became mainstream, it might be easier to shut down a server than a shifting swarm of peers?

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 month ago (5 children)

It's also a fscking mess to set up a Usenet downloader, especially since it'd be a bunch of buggy weird stuff ending with -arr in the names and web UIs.

And no, torrenting isn't outdated and isn't amateur. In Usenet messages are replicated over all services offering that newsgroup. I hope the downsides are clear.

Some kind of Usenet with global identifiers of messages and posters, and with something like Kademlia to find sources for a specific newsgroup(to get all the other side has in it)/post(to get it specifically)/person(their public key), would be much better than just replicating each message everywhere with a local identifier.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Well you could use the -arr stack but you could also just set up SABnzbd which is the same difficulty to set up as qbit/jackett.

I haven't touched the -arrs myself, just go to my indexer, click download, it goes into the correct folder which sabnzbd automatically picks up and starts a-downloadin', then it transfers the complete files to another folder.

But I use both, and slsk, and ytdl. Why limit myself?

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 month ago

OK, I'll try it.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

empornium FTW!

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In my day the popular kids would share it over bluetooth.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Theoriginalthon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

You could but you know there is nsfw content right here on Lemmy

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I haven’t touched a webcam in years but I just touched myself 5 minutes ago

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lots of folks I’d imagine use their phones, which has cameras on both sides

[–] vaionko@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 month ago

Why the hell can't I get a phone without a front camera? I never use it and it creates an annoying hole in my screen

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The spam messages have been duly ignored for years. LOL.

"If you have access to my computer, why are you blackmailing me? You could just steal the money from the accounts."

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No 2FA for transfers at your bank?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] meejle@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

Surprised the UK age verification selfies haven't been used to extort people yet. It'd be so easy (and is such an obvious reason why the law is bullshit).

SecurAge🛡️
"Log in with Google to verify your age."

"Sorry, we weren't able to verify you using your Google Account. Please take a selfie for verification."

"Now give us £1000, or we'll send your picture and details of the porn you were trying to access to everyone in your contacts."

[–] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 month ago

This is what they would see if I was being targeted.

[–] teft@piefed.social 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That only works if you're ashamed about rubbing one out.

[–] realitista@piefed.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Seriously, go ahead and try to give someone that shit. No one would be surprised I watch porn and I don't do it in any sort of interesting way. I'm guessing no one would even want to watch it.

[–] teft@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago

Worst voyeur video ever.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 month ago

Let them watch. Bwahahaha

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’ll reply the same way I do to the scam attempts: Do it bitch.

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 8 points 1 month ago

Also if you are sending my family a copy, send it to my email address too. Thanks.

[–] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Damn, they got a picture of some gaffer tape, that's cool.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago
[–] pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

hardware camera disablers.

[–] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

also called two year old post it note that has never been taken off

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This, thank you Framework! Mic too!

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 6 points 1 month ago

"Reaction videos" are already too common.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Why am I not surprised that this shit's freely available on GitHub.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

These days it's pretty weak blackmail shit. A little AI doctoring can create the same videos... So even if it's possible, that doesn't mean it's plausible, and nobody cares what you do in your bedroom by yourself.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

A friend of mine had this happen to him and he just told them to release it, nothing happened. He was willing to take the embarrassment if it did though is the crucial thing.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Is this a new thing? I remember hearing about this like a decade ago

load more comments
view more: next ›