this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
433 points (98.4% liked)

politics

26172 readers
4774 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When asked directly about the 22nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits any U.S. citizen from serving more than two terms as president, [Steve] Bannon pointed to how there are “many different alternatives” for Trump to stay in office, but did not provide specifics.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OmegaMan@lemmings.world 1 points 15 hours ago

Of course he will? New president isn't sworn in until 2029.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

An orange vegetable for 2028? Imagine the debates.

[–] wavebeam@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I’m more concerned about who will be president in 2029 and beyond.

[–] skibidi@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago (2 children)

So the constitution doesn't actually prohibit anyone from serving more than 2 terms as president, it prohibits someone being elected to the office of president more than twice (or once if they assumed office for more than 2 years of someone else's term.

In 2029 Trump could be elected as speaker of the house and then Vance and Dr. Evil resign as POTUS and VP and bam, Trump round 3.

Trump could also be directly elected to the Vice Presidency, though the legal ground there is shakier given the 12th amendment.

Ultimately, SCOTUS would need to weigh in because there is enough ambiguity in the constitution to allow for just the scenarios above.

Good thing SCOTUS is chock full of no-nonsense nonpartisan jurists of the highest integrity.

[–] elrik@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (4 children)

The 12th Amendment provides that “no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice President.” As such, anyone barred by the 22nd Amendment from being elected president is also ineligible to serve as vice president, and so a twice-elected president cannot return to power through vice-presidential succession.

If a person is constitutionally “ineligible to the office of President,” they are also skipped over in the presidential line of succession under the Presidential Succession Act (3 U.S.C. §19), which prohibits anyone ineligible to serve as president from assuming the office.

The ghouls in power currently don't understand or don't care, and by the time this is tested, it will likely be rubber stamped by the supreme court. But, there's still value in understanding ahead of time that no, that is not a constitutionally valid approach.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 6 points 2 days ago

the Presidential Succession Act (3 U.S.C. §19), which prohibits anyone ineligible to serve as president from assuming the office

"No it doesn't. Your statement is now literally incorrect."

  • USA SC
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

though the legal ground there is shakier

Like everything he's done every single day since inauguration

[–] DBT@lemmy.world 60 points 2 days ago

He 100% doesn’t plan on leaving when his term is up. This stupid ass Epstein Ballroom that he’s having built (amongst other things) is proof of that.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 152 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I don’t know if this happens, or if it doesn’t. There should be zero tolerance for even joking about this. The only thing that I will assert is this: If this happens, and some combination of: another branch of government, state governments, the public, law enforcement, the military, and the media, don’t immediately halt everything and throw his as in out, then the United States is over. I don’t mean ‘over’as a descriptor for decline. I mean it’s just immediately done. There is no nation, there are no laws and we have no constitution. The entire project ceases to exist immediately.

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 52 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Psst… it’s already over, because that’s what Billionaires want.

[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 32 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Lol, the vast majority of Americans will never tolerate Kings, and we mean it. We're willing to die to ensure it never happens here. I know you don't believe me, so I'll just say sit back and watch us torch our billionaire class and eat their flesh. You'd be surprised what Americans are willing to do to ensure No Kings. Its not just a protest slogan. We fucking mean it.

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm in Australia. We have a king and it's no big deal. Thailand has a king and it's no big deal.

What you have on your hands is an imminient dictator. You don't want that.

[–] 5in1k@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago

No, I don’t want either. Call it a king, call it a dictator. They can both eat shit. Fuck your king, fuck Thailand’s king. Their continued existence is an affront to every human being that breathes.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

You already have a king, so there is that! But yeah I’d love to see what you describe. But dude, he tore down the WH and it’s all crickets.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] leadore@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

True, we won't tolerate a king. OTOH, more than a third of us are more than happy to tolerate a dictator.

I really hope it’s true.

My gut doesn’t believe it is.

My heart still hopes.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 123 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

To the watchful observer it is very clear that there is a plan. Deploying troops to urban areas, buying a voting machine manufacturer, installing Project25-vetted admin workers everywhere, .... the list goes on. It does not take a genius to see the intent.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Not to mention expanding the bunker at the WH. Dude knows he's absolutely going to try to stay President no matter what happens. Expect full Franco.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 17 points 2 days ago

I think we need G.I. Robot in the whitehouse

[–] Frostbeard@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Watchfull?! Its blatantly obvious for even the blindest bat that they are not going to give up their front man who keeps the assholes behind the throne in power

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Addled mushbrain probably won't be able to form actual sentences by that time. Not that he could do that before.

Education is important. And not doing drugs. And not being a worthless narcissist nepo who has never worked an honest day in his pathetic life. And not being stupid. And not being a thief, a pedo, and a rapist...

[–] nao@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

Not that any of that matters to his fan base

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 days ago

Yes, of course he is (if he's still alive). His term doesn't end until Jan. 20th, 2029.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Tell me you don't understand how election/inauguration works without actually explicitly saying it…

[–] MilitantAtheist@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

They understand, they just don't care.

[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 62 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I don't think he will be cogent enough to not be shitting himself by 2028. Bannon et. al, keep acting like Trump is a fit, lean, 57 years old and not the fat, addled 79 year old following his own father into the sunset of dementia.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago

He's already shitting himself. The smell is apparently horrid.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I honestly doubt that Donnie has a single more year left, let alone that he'll sit out this term, let alone that he'll do another one.

But when the Cheeto is dead, shit is going to hit the fan

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So? If the Founders COULD have Predicted Trump they WOULDNT have Written that Amendment!

-School Shooting Supporters!

[–] Juice@midwest.social 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The 22nd amendment ratified in 1951?

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

School shooting advocates aren't smart. That's why they are ok with school shootings. They don't go there anyway so it doesn't personally affect them.

[–] g8phcon2@k.fe.derate.me 44 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Unless he dies he'll be President in 2028, his current term isn't set to expire until 2029

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 34 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This feels like the sort of intentional ambiguity someone like Bannon would do to test float an idea. If people freak out he'll just point to the technical truth and if they don't he's taken a step to normalizing the dictatorship.

[–] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Idk, they make it abundantly clear in that interview that they are angling for a third term and skirting the 22nd amendment. He can blabber all he wants about technicalities but at the end of the day he explicitly states he'll have another term, shit he even said two if that's what they need to "finish what they started."

Just think about a 90 year old Donnie rolling around the oval office in a mech suit or something with his head in a glass jar Futurama style. We're gonna be so great...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (4 children)

The man is going to be in his mid 80s! Retire for the love of god! Go drink a mojito on the beach like a normal fucking person!

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago

He's a narcissist. Letting go of ANY shred of power is unimaginable, because he deserves EVERYTHING. Any scrap of power he has relinquished has been at legal gunpoint.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He went on to call Trump a “vehicle of divine providence.”

How to make fascism even worse: mix it with a religious cult

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ryokimball@infosec.pub 25 points 2 days ago

I mean, yeah. And he wasn't president in 2024. That's how election cycles work.

(Just pointing out the stupidity, obv the whole thing is batshit)

[–] figjam@midwest.social 6 points 2 days ago

The Plan: Weekend at Bernie's

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

Bannon sieg heiled. Fuck em.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 4 points 2 days ago

They have a plan?

Holy shit you guys, these ghouls aren't lizard people! They are god damned cylons!

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Knowing him it’s just concepts of a plan 😂

load more comments
view more: next ›