this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2025
141 points (96.1% liked)

News

36018 readers
3725 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Paywall removed: https://archive.is/kSLC2

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 72 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] fonix232@fedia.io 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I propose we make some minor changes to the standard guillotine though, as potentially we will need to use it in a zero gravity environment when these fuckers try to escape to space.

I believe a pair of micro-rockets would give the blade assembly the appropriate near-gravity acceleration, but we do need to run the numbers to ensure we don't end up with single use devices. That would be so wasteful.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Let's hook it up to righteously trained AI and let them try to talk it out of guillotining them. If they manage it they just get to lose all their money instead of their head.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Why not a slow hydraulic cylinder to push the blade down?

[–] Damage@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 months ago

Just adapt a normal mechanical, flywheel press. They work quite fast, great output.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 2 points 2 months ago

Cuz rockets are cool.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 20cello@lemmy.world 58 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Is there any big tech CEO who's not a total moron or that's a specific requisite needed for the role

[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 46 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not necessarily morons, although many are, just sociopaths. They are so rich and powerful and removed from normal society, they don't have to care.

They don't have to work hard, they don't have to think critically, they don't have to compromise, they don't have to worry.

It's like the monarchs and aristocracy of old, so far removed from society, most things we consider virtues are considered insulting to them.

Remember when Bill Gates "worked" for a few hours at a Dairy Queen scooping ice cream? It's a demonstration of elitism, they can choose to play working class for an afternoon, like an outfit they try on.

Oh how quaint, the little workers going about their day scooping ice cream and making fries! Mummy, I want to try to be an ice cream worker today!

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 months ago

Them having to adapt due to a job loss looks very different than what it is for the median American. If every American had an unlimited, worry-free safety net to support them while they navigate employment disruptions, you wouldn't be hearing the guillotine noises you hear today. In fact you'd be able to realize some form of "creative destruction" and working conditions would drasticaly improve since people would actually afford to quit bad jobs.

[–] bystander@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It is all as intended. They didn't stumble into this.

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

Almost none of them are morons. They are all cunning, sophisticated and they spend all their time on work and their goals.

No need to underestimate them.

If anything their weaknesses lie in arrogance, ignorance (not the same thing as being stupid) and low tolerance of dealing with challenges they haven't encountered. As things stand today, this weaknesses haven't really caused them any problems, but that doesn't this will always be true.

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

You can even strip 'big tech' out of it. Overwhelmingly I met C-Suites that were the "fail up" type.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 42 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

It's ok. In ten more years these CEOs will just have to work through the societal disruption of a violent revolution.

Like, how many times does history need to repeat itself for the ruling class to not understand where this leads for them? It leads to guillotines.

Literally the only thing able to stop the violence of unemployed masses is, not AI, not drones, not the police, not the military; it's socialism.

We get their violently or non violently. But the ruling class has already decided it's the former. It's exciting to live during the fall of the American empire. But in 100 years; America will not exists in the form it does today. Unfortunately, history tells us the next 100 years will not be good for us.

[–] ElectricAirship@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 months ago

You give a rich person an inch and they take a mile.

[–] verdi@feddit.org 4 points 2 months ago

All of these tech CEOs come from de jure democracies that are de facto oligarchies. It's how they grew up and all they know. Working class people are Untermenschen for them.

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

They are different. They are special. It couldn't happen to them. They are too smart. Not like those idiots that were deposed and murdered.

/S

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Deal with it you powerless peasants, or die, idgaf I'm a billionaire!

-Sundar Pichai, probably

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Accurate AF

[–] Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How about we adapt by raising taxes on you assholes and funding social programs?

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 9 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Here's an idea, 90% instant wealth tax on billionaires, and use the influx of money for UBI. Then they're free to cut all the jobs for AI.

Rinse and repeat this every year until billionaires simply... don't exist.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] guynamedzero@piefed.zeromedia.vip 23 points 2 months ago

Obligatory FUCK GOOGLE

[–] Doubleohdonut@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Careful what you wish for buddy. When we're all unemployed, we'll be coming for you.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

He will have his army of Tesla killer bots by then.

[–] C4551E@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 months ago

First they'll need the robot-building robots, and before that they'll need the maintenance robots that fix and troubleshoot all the robots. All of this will be designed by the engineering robots, which also don't yet exist

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What jobs? This shit can't even tell you the time.

It's your boss who is firing you to cut costs. AI is the excuse.

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Technically its an excuse to take money away from these jobs and invest them into their own self satisfaction or AI.

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 months ago (3 children)

We need a film series like The Purge but instead of the idiot masses killing each other is the working class legally hunting down the wealthiest and the winner gets to decide how to distribute their prey’s wealth. They can decide to keep it but they will become the next target.

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"DON'T dream it, be it" - if you want something done, write the film yourself. seriously!

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I 100% agree up until the point where my writing skill is somewhere in between a very skilled hamster and a mentally handicapped hamster.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ImperialATAT@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Like a Robin Hood version of The Purge? In my head I see a cute fox but what I want to see is a I know what you did last summer wolf.

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

It’s prestige cinema. People will pay big bucks to watch the 3D version at the local theater.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 months ago

Says the guy that is one of the highest on the proverbial food chain.

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Is it actually wiping jobs?

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)
[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I remember reading a report earlier this year which said that most people who used AI at work found that they didn’t have much use for it and it didn’t make them more productive. So that tracks.

Makes sense that tech CEOs are still pushing it as the miracle tech which will make humans obsolete, though.

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

CEOs are still pushing it

Anything to fuck over people.

[–] Apocalypteroid@feddit.uk 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

My jobs is fairly low level administration, and I have point blank refused to use the AI tools they are trying to force on us. My reasoning to management is that I've never needed it before. My reasoning to my colleagues is that I'm not fucking training it to replace me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

People are saying no but I think it actually is starting to take jobs.

I'm a software engineer and my company is forcing us all to use AI to write code and we basically just review it at this point and test it then fix any issues.

About a year or two ago there was this big change. They said we are "shifting left". A hot new trend in the tech industry where we eliminate quality assurance teams and instead the engineers test their own code. At the time it seemed odd. Why would I test my own code that I already tested? It seems the shift was to lay off those people so the engineers could take over the testing jobs when theirs are automated away.

Now they are starting to question all the managers who don't write code or use AI tools. They have noticed the managers are redundant now too so I don't think they have much time. My manager is vibe coding like crazy.

We also have product managers who are vibe coding now too. Everyone is just trying to hold on to their livelihood as long as they can. It's like battle Royale of who can justify staying on to manage AI agents.

It's insane.

And I know people will say that the code isn't good enough but I assure you it is. Because it's all based on our existing code base that was very well written and has high test coverage requirements. It's very good at following well defined patterns. They just pump a ton of money into it and give it more context.

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

About a year or two ago there was this big change. They said we are "shifting left". A hot new trend in the tech industry where we eliminate quality assurance teams and instead the engineers test their own code.

Yeah, that is absolutely not what Shift-left is. Shift-left is essentially an implementation of TDD, and QA is still a vital component of that. I think you are right in that management used it as a scapegoat to fire people.

However, if what you are saying in the rest of your post is accurate, you need to GTFO that company, fast. It's only going to be a matter of time before the product craters from all the vibe-coding.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I have golden handcuffs for now but it's a very large company with lots of products so my plan is to stay as long as I can while keeping my resume up to date. Also experimenting with some business ideas.

Ideally I can do my own thing one day without all this nonsense.

[–] kowcop@aussie.zone 9 points 2 months ago

The dudes suit probably costs more than most Americans make in a year .. the ones that haven’t lost their job to AI

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago

~~we ~~ you will have to work through societal disruption

FTFY, because he won't have to, and won't work through societal disruption, he will just buy another Ferrari with his extra money or some shit

Having said that, AI as it currently is isn't AI, it's fucking LLMs, and LLMs as they are today won't do any of this shit that is being promised. LLMs pretty much have platoed out, and won't be getting any better soon.

The AI bubble will burst, it's just a question of how quickly and how much of the world will explode with it

And yet again, not only did everyone in power let this bubble form AGAIN, everyone in power AGAIN three everything they got on top of it, believing that the rainbow s end really did have a pot of gold. When the economy eventually breaks badly, AGAIN, those in power will bail out the CEOs with OUR money, blame some easy target that isn't them, and claim there was no way to avoid any of this shit. A few pretend to care laws will be put in place, they won't do shit to prevent the next bubble, but not that it matters because those laws will then be revealed again 5-10 years from now because they'll be remotely standing in the way of the next bubble that is going to be awesome for ~~everyone~~ the top 0.1%

So. Can we now finally outlaw multi millionaires and abovd? Can we now finally cap personal networh at 10-20 million dollars and any income above that goes 100% to taxes? Can we finally cap company networths at 1 billion, maybe 1000 employees, max? Any income above that, 100% to tax

I don't want a single trillion dollar company, I want a million million dollar companies

[–] Chais@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

I'm all for replacing managers with LLMs. Both spew incoherent nonsense that only accidentally coincides with reality and people smarter than them are left to interpret it.

[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago
[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

Cool, cool. How the fuck are we supposed to adapt when AI is doing all the jobs because employer would rather get free labor from a robot than fucking pay a human being? How the fuck are we supposed to earn an income, house ourselves, or feed ourselves? Time to burn it all to the ground and go back to hunting, gathering, and bartering. Sundar doesn't look delicious, but we'll eat him anyway.

[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I work for a Fortune 100 Company and I was just told we won't be issuing full Copilot licenses because the ROI just isn't there.

load more comments
view more: next ›