this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2025
307 points (98.4% liked)

News

33602 readers
1741 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The contempt I feel for these people is unreal...

top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shittydwarf@piefed.social 69 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If this person were to drown in a shallow puddle humanity would be unquestionably better off

[–] DeathByAshaman@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 week ago

Shallow puddle, deep puddle, car accident...

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

That sounds pretty good for business too they should write an article about your idea

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 43 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sociopath. I hope a roach crawls up his urethra.

[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Poor roach. Might as well let it be a candiru, which may actually enjoy the opportunity and experience.

[–] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 40 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The Palantirs in Tolkien's world twisted and corrupted those who used them into evil, paranoid creatures (like Saruman).

This seems like life imitating art.

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It wasn't the palantirs themselves, it was the fact that Sauron had one and used to to twist others to his will.

I think you can still draw the parallel. As in, palantir the company is a mechanism for villains to corrupt the society around them. Or something like that

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 24 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Rolling back anti-slavery laws would also be good for business.

In fact some new laws making anyone whose net worth isn't at least 50 million USD, a property of a randomly assigned mega-corporation, would be amazingly good for business!

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I would say 'don't give them any more ideas' but we both know they already have that idea AND are working to make it so.

[–] tym@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Someone's gotta pick the berries now. Good thing food assistance has a work requirement of at least 20hrs per week!

[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Why you speak as if this frogboil hasn't already happened?

[–] novibe@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Nah you gotta feed and house the slaves. With workers you just pay enough they don’t die and many will even live in cars and eat trash.

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

Wiping Palantir off the face of the earth would contribute substantially to the upward march of humanity.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

CEO's only say this shit when they've already broken the law. I have no doubt in my mind this dude has committed war crimes.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Meaning they should just be arrested and charged already, and not by some special agent, but by a rookie cop just barely out of high school and policy academy and it should be their first felony arrest. Make it as humiliating as possible for them.

[–] Sculptor9157@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was going to make a joke about being harsh for humiliating the cop... But no. Fuck 'em.

Yes, I meant humiliating for the CEO, not the cop. For him it should be a casual Wednesday.

[–] Talaraine@fedia.io 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Eh, not to be 'that girl' but the context of this article doesn't seem to match the title. What he's saying is that if the government WANTS to keep it's activities constitutional, meaning they will succeed in any later litigation, they need detailed information before each and every strike so they can make wise decisions.

His argument is that only HIS company can provide that detailed information...so the government needs to keep paying them.

Ragebait?

“Part of the reason why I like this questioning is the more constitutional you want to make it, the more precise you want to make it, the more you’re going to need my product,” Karp said. His reasoning is that if it’s constitutional, you would have to make 100% sure of the exact conditions it’s happening in, and in order to do that, the military would have to use Palantir’s technology, for which it pays roughly $10 billion under its current contract.

[–] ctrl_alt_esc@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 week ago

Thanks for the additional context, but that's a dumb argument. There is no constitutional ground for these strikes, with or without his bullshit product, because there is no war. They're committing straight up murder which is (still) illegal.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Someone’s been taking the wrong message from Megadeth

[–] blarth@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 week ago

*hears metal guitar *

“This must be about hate and anger!”

Well, yes, but not like that…

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Didn't Dave Mustaine eventually become an outspoken conservative? Like, how the fuck does that ever happen.

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago
[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I hope he becomes a victim of a hate crime.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why would it be a hate crime?

[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So? Doesn't mean any crime against him is because of that? What if it turned out Brian Thompson was a closeted homosexual. It doesnt make his killing a hate crime.

[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean that as in I hope is republican friends plug his nazi ass.

Maybe another 4chan nihilist...

[–] berno@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Alex Karp bad

[–] 100@fedia.io 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

it goes both ways, you cant complain if your enemies target civilians or use biological or chemical weapons

They believe they are a cut above the rest. Basically is they expect the enemy to act with extreme restraint while they exercise none whatsoever.

[–] thoralf@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago

And next they request slave labour to become legal again, right? Because that’s good for business as well.

[–] chromeleon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

That's not what he is saying. This Gizmodo article is trash but at least it gives you the actual quote so you can find out what he really said.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

It is hard to argue he isn't correct.

However.... Wow. It's so shocking to see how happy people are these days to flaunt how evil they are. It's not like evil people didn't exist before, but it's almost like they are celebrated these days.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

He fully intends to use his technology to oppress citizens.