this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2025
43 points (86.4% liked)

No Stupid Questions

44480 readers
1752 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Title basically says it all. Would it depend if it was the US, Russia or China starting it?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 2 points 28 minutes ago

It will not be a war between the major super powers but a break up of the globe along those lines.

The US will continue its war on South American, mainly Venezuela right now. Russia will continue to chip away at the EU and push into their territory. China will take Taiwan, but mainly just focus on making money off both fronts. Africa will continue to be exploited by US/Russia/China.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 2 hours ago

WWI started with the assassination of a national leader that most people had never heard of, but it dominoed throughout the world into a conflagration that killed millions.

A nuclear war is more likely to start like that. Some dumb country gets their hands on a nuke or two, and what fun is a shiny new toy of you can't play with it? Once one goes off somewhere, it could spread fast, as nations either defend themselves, or seek revenge.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 27 points 13 hours ago

We'll all be on the losing side, that's for sure.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 11 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

If WWIII breaks out we're all gonna fucking die. Will there be any countries left after 24 hours?

[–] davepleasebehave@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Isn’t there a movie with that premise? They survive but have to watch over a few months as radiation in the northern hemisphere works its way south. They’re already dead but have to wait months for it to happen

[–] Creepo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Had to look this up is it On the beach?

[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Good chance yes non-aligned nations.

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 46 points 23 hours ago (28 children)

I’m on the side of the poor, weak, disabled and oppressed.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 25 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ICCrawler@lemmy.world 1 points 5 minutes ago

Well, the cool thing about life is that despite humans making up stories that declare themselves the pinnacle of it, when every human is wiped out, life won't care and will flourish without them mucking up the works.

load more comments (27 replies)
[–] Tuuktuuk@piefed.ee 21 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It is possible that WW3 has already broken out, but is not called that way yet. WW2 was not immediately called WW2 either. It took some time for it to grow to the dimensions that enabled it to be called a World War.

As in the previous two world wars, some countries will be switching sides. Just like USA has been doing now, hopping between the side of the Russia and the side of humanity about once per week, depending on how their president is feeling about things each morning.

If we are currently in WW3, then the sides are very confusing:
USA is against China but on the side of the Russia.
China is on the side of the Russia but not really against anyone. Except its own minorities?
EU and UK are against the Russia but not against USA or China.

[–] notgold@aussie.zone 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

We have always been at war with them

[–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 3 points 17 hours ago

I love how they claim Antarctica, like those penguins are defending the beachheads.

[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 15 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

That depends on when it will break out. If it's tomorrow, China and Russia will be buddies or at the very least will be in a non-aggression pact situation. Most of Europe will side against Russia but might be more mealy mouthed towards China (even if they decide to start it by going after Taiwan and that escalates from there). The US will, as it is tradition in a world war, not enter until much later or unless attacked first. And on whose side? Depends on one person's bowel movement on that day an no longer on treaties and commitments. One of the many crucial areas to watch will be if the US honors the security alliance with Japan.

I say it depends on when because if we give it another 25-50 years, attitudes may shift. The US could try going for a more sane leadership and affirm its NATO membership. Sentiments towards Russia may shift in Europe, especially if the US is progressing further towards Idiocracy.

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

The US will be bankrolling Russia. Russia is weak and poor. The only reason they're still in Ukraine is China. And once they've conquered that, the US will happily help them invade the rest of Europe.

[–] CovfefeKills@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

The empire-ambitious Axis of convenience: US, Israel, India, China, Russia, various Islamic kingdoms etc vs. whoever is willing to get in their way.

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I'm from New Zealand. We've traditionally been a US ally but the situation being what it is at the moment, I think there's a good chance we'd try to stay neutral.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Sorry bro. Not gonna happen.

Australia and NZ really have to stand together just because of the geography. Australia is critical to NZ's security. If a superior force conquers Australia, then NZ wouldn't be able to resist in isolation. Logically then it will always be in NZ's interest to stand along side Australia.

Similarly, Australia needs a bigger more powerful friend to stare down our neighbors like Indonesia and bullies like China. That friend has been the US for the last 70 odd years, and with AUKUS that alliance will be greatly strengthened.

In any conflict since the dawn of time people have wistfully hoped that their own clan or tribe or city or country could stay neutral, but the reality is that to maintain your neutrality you need to be strong enough to defend yourself without assistance.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 points 6 hours ago

Australia's biggest trading partner is China. It's absolutely against their interest to have any kind of conflict with China. But being a puppet state of the US, they're probably gonna do that anyway.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 22 hours ago

New Zealand will go where its billionaire expat refugee community tells it to go.

[–] sbeak@sopuli.xyz 6 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

If the U.S. started the Great War Part III, it would probably be due to an invasion/takeover of a Russian-aligned country (e.g. Iran)

If Russia began the third big one, it would probably be due to either a) invasion of another European country (e.g. Finland, the Baltics) or b) some huge scandal that may or may not be truthful where American/European/NATO/whatever spies are found in Russian soil, prompting a justification to declare war.

If China were to start the war, it would almost certainly begin with either the hot topics of Taiwan or the South China Sea. I doubt the Chinese would risk a war for either though, and would only go in when the U.S. are distracted in some other war (e.g. if Trump goes in on Venezuela)

edit: or it could be over natural resources. Again.

[–] discocactus@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

China would go to war to protect their energy supply. If the US and Russia+Saudi team up its game on. Looks what's happening now...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bigfishbest@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I'm on the side of the Vietnamese

[–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 4 points 17 hours ago

Pho around and find out.

load more comments
view more: next ›