this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2026
526 points (99.4% liked)

politics

27192 readers
3700 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 87 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

The Dumbest <thing> In History is Trump's bag, baby. It's his home territory. An enduring legacy he has painstakingly built over decades. It's a tall bar to clear, but I think Trump can top the Emu War.

I can't predict anything this administration does, but it seems very possible we attack on MLK day.

[–] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago (2 children)

but it seems very possible we attack on MLK day.

I'd be curious to hear your reasoning for this.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 32 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

I think he'd love to rename it after himself somehow. And if they did an instant takeover, that would be Trump's "V-Day."

I wouldn't bet money on it, but if I had to, that's the day I'd pick. They are ramping up the rhetoric more than they ever did for Venezuela.

I think his birthday is coming up. That is a strong contender as well. "Happy Birthday, Mr. President. We got you Greenland."

"Wow, no one has ever gotten me one of those before. Can I do the whole Prime Nocturn thing with the Danish gals?"

That might be a better bet, even.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They are ramping up the rhetoric more than they ever did for Venezuela.

I mean I wouldn't say that. They quite literally murdered people regularly in the lead up to that with the boat thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ProIsh@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If I'm thinking like an idiot a la trump I'd think then when we celebrate mlk we're actually celebrating takeover of Greenland day. In his mind maybe replacing a holiday he dislikes. Maybe another purity test for his idiot followers

[–] Amberskin@europe.pub 11 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Even if the US military achieve complete control of Greenland in a short time (they will not, and will learn the danes know how to fight in the snow), the first thing the next admin will do is to pull off, bring the troops home and negotiate the possible war reparations.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 68 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I don't think this dude realises that he is talking about the dumbest president in American history, but then again he did get into the White House TWICE, so i'm not really sure who's stupider? him or those that put him there and are STILL rooting for him...

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 40 points 6 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It shows you how rigged the voting system is in favor of the Republicans for the presidential election. They have rejected the illusion of democracy at this point let alone the practice.

They have gerrymandered, used religion, the courts, infiltrated voting systems, and not to mention producing constant propaganda with a heavy reliance on othering people to ensure they win even when their numbers are less.

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 23 points 6 days ago

I think he might be the dumbest world leader in history, honestly.

Like, there have been some real morons throughout the world, but this guy really takes the idiot cake.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Republicans and the voters that voted Trump are definitely the stupider part of that situation. Being fooled by a fool makes you pretty stupid. Failing to detect the blatant lies of a pathological liar makes you stupid. Thinking the obvious flaming sociopathic narcissist is on your side makes you stupid.
The only way to be that stupid is by a lifetime of indoctrination that up is down. Americans have been indoctrinated for a century that freedom is the ultimate highest value, higher than life itself, without ever actually making a good definition of what freedom is! And Trump is a sociopathic narcissist, with no conscience no respect for anything or regard for other people and little self control, and that is seen by most of the American population as the ultimate expression of the freedom they idolize.
Americans are also indoctrinated to admire being rich, as a sign of skill and intelligence. And since Trump is rich and famous, Americans think he is intelligent, despite his fortune is based on his inheritance.

[–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 55 points 6 days ago (1 children)

An attack on Greenland would trigger Article 5. An attack on one is an attack on all. It would start a world war.

Trump said that electing Kamala would lead to world war 3. Every accusation is an admission.

[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I think the EU would capitulate. They know they can't fight the US. But it would likely be the end of NATO.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There are options. Dumping US bonds would collapse the US, and the only thing that makes it hard is the US economy collapsing would be a bad thing for the EU right now.

Also, protracted resistance. Greenland is harsh territory, and Nordic weekend soldiers regularly beat US marines in exercises in cold weather warfare.

The USSR lost half a million in Afghanistan, 50k to fighting, 450k to the environment. And they didn't need to resupply via the Atlantic.

Also, the Nordics probs have the world's best submarine interdiction fleet, and most of the Cold War era US anti-sub stuff is actually reliant on Greenland, Iceland and the UK cooperating.

Nordic subs regularly score hits on US carriers in exercises.

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It would be the end of NATO as it stands, there's no reason the remaining countries couldn't continue the alliance or start a new one.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

Would technically have to be a new one, NATO wasn't designed to handle this sort of scenario. Of course New NATO would be an America-free roughly equivalent, with some different governance to prevent things like a single county impeding something everyone else wants.

[–] saimen@feddit.org 4 points 5 days ago

NATO already is mostly EU + US and then only Canada, UK, Turkey and some smaller ones which all are (politically) very close to the EU (much closer than to the US at least).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 50 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Dumbest war in history so far.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Rhoeri@piefed.world 41 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Considering that Trump will go down in history as politics’ dumbest fucking member, it’s not a stretch.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (5 children)

I mean it was ronald reagon up to this point but trump well being trumped is going to have a whole new meaning after this.

[–] Therefore@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (6 children)

There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again.

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago

That wasn't even stupidity. He just realized partway through the sentence that he didn't want there to be an audio clip of him saying "shame on me." So he tried to change it and made it so much worse.

If anything this makes him more relatable.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Dumbest war in history for far and away the dumbest U.S. president in history?

Sounds about right.

You forgot most openly corrupt.

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 15 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Well, this is the dumbest head of state in history. The only other one I can think of that comes close is Berlusconi, but at least he didn't have the world's largest military.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 8 points 5 days ago

They want to kill nato but do not have the juice on their own. So taking greenland in adventurism they figure could overcome that, I suspect.

The president and many of his people are compromised by russia, and in league with them, (israel moreso but that is neither here nor there,) and this is what they want, to set nato against each other while he and the us secretly help far right client parties in those states get elected then fix themselves in power.

T

[–] saimen@feddit.org 6 points 5 days ago

There are several people who met trump personally saying he is the dumbest person they have ever met.

[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 19 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I agree it would be the dumbest war in history. And there was a war over a bucket.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 7 points 5 days ago

well I mean Trump is the dumbest president in history too, so...

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

IDK, there have been a lot of dumb wars. I don't think that's a competition worth grading though.

[–] WildPalmTree@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Going to war with an ally over territory you have free access to has to place near the top though!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Really shouldn't have used a superlative, now Orangeman will want another subtitle.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 13 points 6 days ago (5 children)

The Americans will gain absolutely nothing that they don’t already have.

Not true. They'll gain the thing that they actually want, possible mineral and oil fields, even though nobody is asking for it. Trump sees dollar signs, even though as per usual it's terrible business, but he has a military to enforce his wants so we're all fucked

Trump is a mobster wannabe if mobsters were just terribly dumb

Even the oil companies don't want Venezuela, yet he invaded it for them anyway

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

Also he probably looks at a Mercator projection map and thinks New Trumpistan would be just YUGE. Trump the great they will call him in his own imagining of history.

[–] paranoia@feddit.dk 9 points 6 days ago

US companies can apply for mineral extraction in Greenland if they want, there is nothing stopping them. Greenland would be quite happy for the tax.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They already have access to mineral and oil rights in Greenland. This is literally just about the words on the map, just like Gulf of Mexico.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

And we have a military base there, too.

I think someone wrote some gaslighty DARVO piece in The Atlantic taking this "reasonable" position about how we "had" to acquire Greenland at any cost.

I still don't understand how any of their reasons are real reasons, other than Donvict wanting to feel like his tiny peen is yooooge and still works.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 15 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Idk, invading the wrong country for 20 years was also pretty dumb. Maybe not for american standards, but for every developed country.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

Never underestimate the power of large groups of dumb people doing very dumb things.

The redcaps are not a majority, but they got Donvict into office and Donvict probably has something like the Sarah Palin Floor for support - somewhere in the high 20s percent to low 30s percent, I'd wager. That's millions of very stupid people that are cheerleading dumb things.

[–] jollyrogue@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 days ago (7 children)

There are dumber ideas.

Invading Mexico or Columbia ranks higher. You know countries with people who have experience fighting guerrilla wars and have existing relationships with arms dealers.

Invading China probably takes top spot though. Don’t start land wars in Asia, especially with a peer state who has most of the world’s manufacturing capacity.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

No, Greenland ranks higher than Mexico or Colombia I'm pretty sure. Because even if the US wins, there's nothing to gain strategically, only lose. Greenland being part of Denmark which is part of NATO, the US can literally just ask Denmark "hey can we build military bases on your kewl island" and Denmark likely would've been like "ok sure" before all the recent shenanigans. The stated goals are literally achievable without declaring war on allies.

I don't think Trump will invade China - or if he does, I don't think that the rest of the chain of command would listen to him anymore. THAT would indeed be the stupidest thing he could do. Everybody will lose if that happens, but especially the US.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bullerfar@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

How is it dumber to exercise militiary actions, in countries that are already busy in the CIA schedule and does drug operations on a weakly basis, than attacking a god damn ally which hasn't done US any harm what so ever?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 days ago

As a member of a country that was until rather recently at war with Denmark, if the Americans want to fight the Danes, they'll have to fight us too.

[–] borQue@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 days ago

Don't say that to Donnyboy... he'll get a red face and stamps his feet

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 10 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Even dumber than the one Australia lost to a bunch of kangaroos?

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 6 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Falklands on notice

load more comments
view more: next ›