this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
227 points (97.9% liked)

science

25079 readers
398 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 71 points 2 days ago (3 children)

How about 15?

Also, I wonder if they controlled for people who do specific kinds of work where coffee explicitly helps in the labor.

[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 76 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How about 15?

Fight dementia today, by dying of a heart attack at 45 instead

[–] Berengaria_of_Navarre@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

15 is a fine number. I once had 15 in two hours. I'm fine.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I discovered a hack deal by just pouring extra shots of espresso into the coffee. One cup, 10 shots, one gram of caffeine. Expect the barista to glare with concern, it’s part of the deal.

I did once have two quad espressi while waiting for a flight at stupid o'clock in the morning at Stansted airport. The guys in Costa coffee mostly just found it amusing.

I was also once approached by an alcoholic who chastised me for drinking coffee in a bar in the middle of the day instead of "a real drink". I offered to take a shot of vodka for each espresso he drank and "we would see who dies first". He didn't take me up on my offer.

[–] homes@piefed.world 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

How does any form of “labor” not fit that criterion?

[–] agingelderly@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Yeah that doesn't make sense. More like if the people drinking 3-4 cups a day are doing mental work vs physical work

[–] MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Im not convinced that picking Amazon packages, operating heavy machinery, doing data entry, or copy editing would have vastly differing performance changes from coffee consumption.

However…

I would imagine that an office worker might have more ready access to coffee, such as a communal coffee maker, than someone with less sedentary workspace.

[–] ugandan_airways@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

Read in a book about coffee that without coffee the Industrial Revolution wouldn’t have happened. Coffee fuels capitalism by making people work.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I believe surgeons, dentists, and people who do similar small-scale hands-on work, like precision soldering, avoid coffee, because it makes for shaky (but alert!) hands. There are likely enough others that I'm not thinking of.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 13 points 2 days ago

"Who are you again?I haven't had my coffee yet."

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 2 days ago

I'm on my way to having anti-dementia, then.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

In this case, it appears to be the caffeine. Also, with these sorts of large studies, the amount is self-reported, so "a cup" is whatever the person reporting considers to be a cup, it's not some controlled amount.

Key Points

Question: Is long-term intake of caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee associated with risk of dementia and cognitive outcomes?

Findings: In this prospective cohort study of 131 821 individuals from 2 cohorts with up to 43 years of follow-up, 11 033 dementia cases were documented. Higher caffeinated coffee intake was significantly associated with lower risk of dementia. Decaffeinated coffee intake was not significantly associated with dementia risk.

Meaning: Higher caffeinated coffee intake was associated with more favorable cognitive outcomes.

[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

Yea, "associated" does the work here. More research is needed into daily mental activities. It could simply be that those requiring more caffeine are also more stimulated day to day.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Did they account for the coffee achievers? Maybe they threw off the curve.

Link for the kids

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Remember the definition of dementia is a bit counter-intuitive. It’s “not important” what sort of neural degradation you are dealing with, the diagnosis is defined by how much it affects you. A lot of the things that “reduce” dementia are actually things that help you work around the damage so the impact in your life is reduced.

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

how are they defining "cup"? 16 oz? 8? some coffee roasters advise using 6oz "cups" as a measurement, some say 8

[–] tomkatt@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don’t know regarding the study, but as a rule coffee “cups” are commonly either 4oz or 6oz.

6oz is the most common measurement for a “cup” of coffee as far as I know.

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

which is hilarious because a "cup" for me is more than 3 times that

[–] tomkatt@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Yeah, my average “cup” is like 16-18oz.

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 7 points 2 days ago
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Only 2-3 cups?? I think I have dementia risk credit.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

We can start a scam like carbon-credits, and sell off our extra coffee usage to others who don't drink as much!

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Causation vs correlation. I’m thinking caffeine keeps your brain stimulated which lowers risk of dementia. You can probably equally keep your brain stimulated other ways especially if you already have an active lifestyle.

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

especially if you already have an active lifestyle

There's no need to attack me so hard

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Haha doesn’t have to be physically active

[–] FreeBeard@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Iirc the causality is thought to be about opening vesicles and increasing blood flow in the brain.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

My guess is that people who regularly drink coffee are supporting some sort of regular mental activity, like a job or school.

[–] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 day ago

Could be due to fiber. Reduce cholesterol, improve gut health

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Guess I'll die

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I drink coffee because I'm tired because I didn't sleep enough.

caffeinated coffee lowers risk. not sleeping increases risk.

does that mean that I can replace sleep with caffeine?

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] Brosplosion@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Read the article? They found that decaf did not confer the same benefits

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 8 points 2 days ago

Given that they specified "caffeinated tea" as also conferring benefit, I would guess it's the caffeine that's the active substance here.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

More is better, right? . . . MORE IS BETTER?!?!!

*shlurp*

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

The most pronounced associated differences were observed with intake of approximately 2 to 3 cups per day of caffeinated coffee or 1 to 2 cups per day of tea.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If this is true I’m gonna be the smartest person in the nursing home.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Correlation does not equal causation

Edit: although half the rate is very interesting

[–] Chais@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

But it does nod in a direction and wiggle its eyebrows suggestively.

load more comments
view more: next ›