this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2023
345 points (99.4% liked)

News

22908 readers
3394 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

When Texas college students return to their campuses after the winter break, they’ll discover the lights are still off in their campuses’ diversity offices.

That’s because a new law that outlaws such work at the state’s higher education institutions goes into effect, Jan. 1.

Another 29 laws also will go into effect in the new year that aim to change the economy, tax codes and the criminal justice system.

...

Dissolving diversity, equity and inclusion efforts at public universities: Senate Bill 17 requires public universities to end so-called diversity, equity and inclusion work. Universities will also be unable to offer training on diversity and inclusion for its faculty and staff, or require diversity statements in hiring processes. Universities must also confirm to the Legislature between legislative sessions that they are in full compliance.

...

The law’s restrictions do not apply to class instruction, materials needed for federal grant applications or student organizations on campuses, but multiple university officials have said the law has made hiring new faculty more difficult.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] msage@programming.dev 63 points 8 months ago

The cruelty is the point

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 61 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Makes sense that a state that originally declared independence from Mexico because they wanted to keep up the institution of slavery also doesn't want a diverse university population.

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Fun (in the loosest sense of the word) fact: The Oklahoma panhandle also exists because Texas wanted to keep slavery.

[–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Is the Oklahoma panhandle a euphemism for a gentleman's part?

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

In case you're not meme'ing, its because the strip of land makes Oklahoma look like a pan, with it as the handle of it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma_Panhandle

[–] CaptainProton@lemmy.world 58 points 8 months ago

Asshats seem to do this in the death throes of failed ideas. Lose a case and double down with a pile of new laws that take a decade to untangle in the courts.

This is 100% a replay of racists' loss on segregation, and it's happening in both red and blue states on separate issues: as bigots in red stateslose on human rights for classes they dislike and classists in blue states lose the rich having the monopoly on force/self-defense.

[–] Vaginal_blood_fart@sh.itjust.works 41 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Shit states gonna shit state.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 11 points 8 months ago

They are a rough draft. It's the sandbox for just how awful a government can treat it's citizens before they revolt. So far it's working really well. Except the final draft in 2024.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Can we let them have their freedom so I can stop funneling my tax dollars to their autocratic christofascist fucking messes?

Seriously.. you're right. I'm a coastal elite douchebag. You were right all along. I get it now. By all means, please go your own way. Don't let the door hit your electrical grid on the way out..

[–] chocolateo@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Let's give the state back to Mexico and let them sort it out

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

Republicans love small government. /s

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

Small Government! Freedom!

[–] Anamnesis@lemmy.world -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

While I think this law is overall a bad thing, ending diversity statements is a good thing. They add unnecessary work to an already onerous application process, and mostly serve to just serve to exclude lower class applicants of any race who don't know the right way to write a diversity statement. In practice they're mostly a class signifier and should be abolished.

[–] Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes those poor dumb University hopefuls who don't know how to use google because they are too impoverished to learn how to use a computer and have too much lead poisoning impacted impairments to learn to write a basic essay... To apply for University...

Did they get rid of Legacy admissions by any chance?

[–] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I mean, you can't just Google how to write a diversity statement in a way that matches what a university hiring committee wants. It's like googling how to write an email as a rich alumnus. It's a deep culture that most people don't have access to.

[–] Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

Yes you can. You can actually specify which specific University you are applying to on a search and usually get fairly specific advice and monetarily or connection lacking perspective University students basically make a job and practice of learning that shit for obtaining scholarships and those who feel they want to give back make their stuff known. The ability to research well is selective but so is requiring excellent grades and tests.

Saying "This job requiring a cover letter disadvantages people because writing cover letters is hard" for a highly competitive job that requires a high level of aptitude in writing as a basic requirement for getting the job is kind of a joke. Meanwhile the fast tracks and leg ups for kids based strictly on who their parents are still in place and represent an actual nepotism problem that creates a privileged class that no manner of personal merit will allow someone to benefit from.

[–] NobodyElse@sh.itjust.works -3 points 8 months ago (5 children)

An unpopular opinion I’m sure (for reasons), but do these offices actually achieve anything besides bloating up the already obese administration that sucks money away from the academic side of the university?

[–] makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world 87 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Ah yes, suddenly everyone cares about where money is going when discussing something they dislike.

The thing about diversity and inclusion is that there are a lot of systemic barriers that people don't see until they go looking for them. People who live with disadvantages learn to adapt to them and frequently don't vocalize them to avoid being a burden. Contrary to conservative narrative, these offices do more than promote affirmative action. These offices examine historical architecture to make them more accessible to the handicapped, proactively identify/resolve problems for university brands, provide funds and support to clubs, and help with employment opportunities for students.

Will the closure of these offices immediately create problems for campuses? Probably not. Will there be other issues that pop up that these departments exist to prevent? Almost certainly

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 39 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

It's absolutely bonkers to me that people don't believe there is intrinsic value to mechanical diversity. When I taught student engineering teams, the effects could not have been more obvious. Homogenous groups of "friends" would produce the most lazy, derivative and uncreative work, while it was always that last team of stragglers who had never spoken to each other who would consistently produce actual groundbreaking projects. Most of the time these were middle of the road students in terms of their grades as well.

Being forced outside of a comfort zone literally activates different parts of your brain. It forces you to approach problem solving and teamwork from first principles instead of conditioned and subconscious hierarchy. Seeing this first hand has probably been one of the most formative experiences for me, and I will continue to preach this gospel wherever I go. Just add it to the long list of reasons Texas can suck my tits.

[–] aodhsishaj@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

This is literally how the United States started competing so well in STEM. Literally the only good aspect of the assimilation that came about during the industrial revolution.

https://edsitement.neh.gov/media-resources/backstory-melting-pot-americans-assimilation

[–] Texas_Hangover@lemm.ee -1 points 8 months ago

Is there something wrong with your tits?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Meltrax@lemmy.world 43 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Probably not, honestly, but I truly can't think of a justification for making them illegal. How is outlawing diversity training and knowledge useful to anyone?

[–] steveman_ha@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

DEI exercises in other kids of businesses often seem like performative BS, if we're being honest -- IMHO, this is a really legitimate and simple question. Especially considering the impact bloated admin "costs" (salaries, etc) have on students & society (e.g. student loan debt).

Not reading all the way down, but just wanted to say I think it sucks that you got downvoted for this comment. You've got one less from me, anyways.

But also yeah, they do try and do things that really make a difference. Among other things, they make cross-campus connections to develop initiatives aimed at supporting students from under- represented groups -- not just race or ethnicity, but also things like low-income, first generation in your family to attend, etc.

Things like this can strongly correlate with more distractions, difficulties, and obstacles in students' lives, compared to observations of students from so-called "privileged" backgrounds. Not providing anything that those students from other backgrounds don't have access to -- quite the opposite actually.