this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
66 points (98.5% liked)

Ask Lemmy

38148 readers
1176 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 13 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

One of the most common is that people were stupid in the past. Humans have been roughly the same intelligence across history. There was lack of technology and knowledge, but ancient people were far more intelligent than many give them credit for.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

I love bringing this up to people who laugh about "how dumb old people were".

I then remind them that people just five years ago thought that 5g towers were mind control devices that activated the microchips in vaccines. I then proceed to explain to them that it's possible to level two fenceposts 10 meters apart using nothing but a hose filled with water and Archimedes Principal.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 3 points 16 hours ago

Ancient Aliens is based on the assumption that ancient humans were too stupid to do anything unassisted

[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 11 points 1 day ago

That we have gotten dumber.

Or smarter.

Or more moral.

Or less moral.

Anyone who says that is trying to sell you some ideology.

If you know your history, you know humanity has fundamentally always been humanity since we started writing shit down. Possibly earlier, but then we can't be sure because no-writing-itis.

Some of the oldest texts we have are old men cranking about the kids these days.

There's stories of people being awful and exploiting each other. There's stories of people taking care of each other and of their surroundings during dark times. There's stories of people being weird little guys. We have just sorta always been ourselves.

[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 5 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

That everything is getting better all the time.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 77 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Average life spans. People in ancient times didn't drop dead at forty. They regularly lived to be advanced ages we would consider normal. It's just that infant and young child deaths were so common it really drags down the average.

[–] tangible@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago

Also a horrific amount of mothers dying in childbirth didn't do wonders for the average.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is just the typical modern misunderstanding of statistics.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

To be fair, I doubt people understood statistics much better back in the day, either.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

And there were poor or no records of birth, they guessed at people's age of death.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That's not actually true. People died of a variety of infections and disease we treat easily today, many people were malnourished. The big historical boosts in lifespan were after antibiotic discovery, insulin, and GPCR cardiac meds.

No, people did not life longer before 1900.

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Mid-adult deaths dragged down the average. Child deaths really dragged down the average. The point is that the interpretation of "40 year life expectancy" is caused by misunderstanding averages, not from some massively inferior physiology of prior humans. Yes, more things readily killed you, but it wasn't a mid-life ticking time bomb. Excluding infant death bumps expectancy up around 10-20 years

[–] williams_482@startrek.website 1 points 23 hours ago

A bit of column A, a bit of column B.

Yes, 50% child mortality skews life expectancy statistics heavily, but any 40 year life expectancy estimate is clearly filtering out at least some portion of childhood deaths. By our best estimates: of the 48% of people who survived age 10, slightly less than half were dead by 45. Of those who clear 45, less than half reach 65.

Those early deaths aren't driven by "inferior physiology", but disease and malnourishment (as the previous commenter noted). It was possible to live into your 80s, but you had to be very, very lucky to pull it off.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

So common as in literally half of kids died.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (7 children)

"Beer and wine were invented because drinking water was unsafe."

No, people have generally always known how to find clean drinking water and understood its importance. Beer and wine got made because they were delicious, nutritious, and got ya drunk.

"Medieval Europeans needed spices because all of their meat was rotten."

No, they had the same physiology we do and would have been just as disgusted by rotten meat. They would eat fresh meat when in season, and they knew how to preserve it by smoking, salting, drying, pickling, or fermenting it. Medieval Europeans wanted spices for the same reason we do, because they taste really good.

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

“Beer and wine were invented because drinking water was unsafe.”

No, people have generally always known how to find clean drinking water and understood its importance. Beer and wine got made because they were delicious, nutritious, and got ya drunk.

Sounds like someone who misheard a different fact. Which is why sailors drink low proof alcohol on long voyages. Because they couldn't safely store water for such a long time. Water turns green and becomes undrinkable if you store it in a barrel. It's one of the things that helped unlock ocean travel in the 1400's.

Alcohol occurs naturally in nature. It did not need 'inventing.'

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

Alcohol occurs naturally in nature. It did not need 'inventing.'

I think they meant “mastering the production process”

Or we could say the same for nuclear fusion reactors

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Im totally sure these are just myths. Its like the americans traveling abroad asking for coke in the bottle. If your traveling and getting something from an inn you know the alcohol is likely safer than whatever standards they have for water. I mean they did not have germ theory but over time people would realize alcohol is safer. If your poor you will eat some marginal things and hide the flavor although granted spices were expensive till they were not and its pretty well known wealthy people put a bunch on to show off and when it got cheap that is when the fancy cooking with proper pairings became a big thing. poor people getting spices im sure at some point was like. omg! you had to be a lord to have a meal like this when I was a kid.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 day ago (5 children)

No, people have generally always known how to find clean drinking water and understood its importance.

Citation very needed. People thought some water to be better than others, and the Romans went as far as building out aqueducts to their favourite springs, but an understanding it can cause water borne disease, and that it can look and smell fine but be bad, is decidedly modern. Health effects weren't necessarily thought to be confined to drinking either - holy water and baptisms being an example where just contact was thought to confer something.

The spices thing is legit, though. How long would you last eating no spices whatsoever? Trading gold for an equal mass of pepper suddenly doesn't seem so dumb.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

that it was brutal and terrible

https://aeon.co/essays/why-inequality-bothers-people-more-than-poverty

But research conducted among the Ju/’hoansi in the 1950s and ’60s when they could still hunt and gather freely turned established views of social evolution on their head. Up until then, it was widely believed that hunter-gatherers endured a near-constant battle against starvation, and that it was only with the advent of agriculture that we began to free ourselves from the capricious tyranny of nature. When in 1964 a young Canadian anthropologist, Richard Borshay Lee, conducted a series of simple economic input/output analyses of the Ju/’hoansi as they went about their daily lives, he revealed that not only did they make a good living from hunting and gathering, but that they were also well-nourished and content. Most remarkably, his research revealed that the Ju/’hoansi managed this on the basis of little more than 15 hours’ work per week. On the strength of this finding, the anthropologist Marshall Sahlins in Stone Age Economics (1972) renamed hunter-gatherers ‘the original affluent society

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 33 points 1 day ago (4 children)

"There didn't used to be so many LGBTQ+ people back in the day"

It's because folks were forced into the closet with threats of institutionalization, prison, physical harm, marginalization, and even death. And then there probably was a time when there were fewer gay people, because HIV ravaged the gay male population in many parts of the world while our leaders turned a blind eye because it was killing "the right" people for a time.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Go even further back, and nobody gave a shit if you were gay. Or were even considered weird for not doing gay stuff.

[–] frisbird@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago

In fact, it generally wasn't even a category. It was just a behavior

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also a lot of the people who were openly gay throughout history had their identity hardwaved away. They were roomates!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DigDoug@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Protestants spread the myth that people in the middle ages thought the earth was flat to try and discredit Catholicism.

Ancient Greeks proved the earth was a sphere as early as the 4th century BC.

[–] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And Eratosthenes calculated its circumference to within a few hundred kilometers because he treated the earth as a perfect sphere instead of the oblate spheroid it is

[–] ProfessorScience@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

My favorite is that in the same vein, Aristarchus estimated the size of the sun to be much larger than the earth (although he still severely underestimated it because it's so hard to measure), and therefore proposed that the earth should orbit around the sun. And the main problem with his theory was not any religious objection, but rather that his model would imply that there should be parallax visible among the stars. Unless they are, you know, ridiculously far away.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Life back in the day was so much easier!

Just so dumb on so many counts.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago (19 children)

I will concede that it was simpler. But definitely not easier.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Corsets were awful: only when you tight laced, and the majority of women didn't. Corsets and stays were designed to support the boobs and smooth out clothing. That's it.

No ankles: yes ankles. Skirts were usually above the ankles for practical reasons.

Feudalism bad: yes and no. It meant everyone had a job and housing. Homelessness didn't exist until the end of feudalism.

[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Oh, one more addendum to this, another myth related to Corsets:

"The silhouette of the 19th century was achieved by squishing a woman's organs to the point of death"

This was rare. Ladies were instead padding everything else. You'll look like you have an impossibly thin waist if you've basically strapped a pillow to your arse and another to your tits.

[–] williams_482@startrek.website 5 points 23 hours ago

Feudalism bad: yes and no. It meant everyone had a job and housing. Homelessness didn’t exist until the end of feudalism.

There were absolutely homeless and destitute people in feudal societies. Quite a lot of them, really, although the individuals in question likely didn't live very long. We have many references to beggars from this period, as well as some insight into attempts to curtail them.

Someone who finds themselves displaced from where they used to live can't just wander onto some lord's land and start farming. That land is already full of people who are producing just barely enough to feed themselves (after said local lord's taxes are accounted for). A typical peasant family has more labor available than is required to till their rather small allocation of farmable land, which itself is often insufficient to feed them. Any surplus labor is spent working land of one of the local "big men" to cover the gap. Supporting an additional person off the street, even one capable of putting in a good shift, is no easy task in this period.

It's easy to romanticize the past from a great distance when looking at the problems of our present, and produce some wildly incorrect conclusions as a result. Feudalism (to the extent that this term refers to any specific system at all, scholars don't use it very much these days) was a deeply unfair system with a host of structural problems, and had far fewer safety nets for the unlucky members of society than any developed country has today.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Feudalism was essentially slavery without the formal ownership.

[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 1 points 1 day ago

The Ankle thing was less about the ankles themselves and more about how a lady (and by 'lady' I mean specifically rich women, who did in fact wear skirts that touched the floor in a lot of time periods) lifting her skirt implied an invitation for further intimacy while not being indecent.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] moondoggie@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The eighties didn’t look like the eighties for most of us. The eighties looked more like the seventies.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tm12@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“How did everyone know how to blow on the cartridges without Twitter?”

We went to friends houses and learned.

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not even that. I mean the game didn't load up correctly, so you replug it. Then 'clean' the contacts - and just blow in the cartridge.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›