this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
407 points (98.1% liked)

News

36457 readers
3117 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A couple of 20-year-old developers make $500,000 a month promising to help men to stop watching porn, but exposed their private porn watching habits.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] poke@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Wow this comment section is actually awful. If you're somehow seeing this early on in the list: get out of here before it's too late. There are some really, really toxic takes in here.

[–] cristo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

You weren't kidding, it's baffling how they came to some of these conclusions.

[–] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Got to give them a hand. They really found a vast and **untapped **(emphasis) market.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

First they came for the gooners, but being gooners they already came themselves.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 30 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

People are so fucking weird

[–] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago

Repression is what does it. Check out Japan after our puritanical takeover. They're... different now.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Masturbating I get, becoming addicted to something you enjoy I get, using a third party app to try to break your addiction seems dumb but I get how desperation can make you dumb

What I absolutely can't get is what anyone could productively do with this data. Like, I don't even think blackmailing someone with this could work. The worst you could say about someone with it is that they had a porn habit they didn't like and were trying to change it, and anyone rational is just gonna say "I don't see what's the big deal with watching porn, but good on you for attempting some kind of self improvement I guess."

[–] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Oh No NaKeD mAmMaLs

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I'd imagine someone who watches something illegal would be judged pretty harshly by their peers even if you can't deny that they were trying to seek help. Like, if someone were to seek help for homocidal thoughts, and their employer and friends found out, I can't imagine they'd have a job and many friends left. If there are any influential people who used this app, and were into some unsavory things, I could definitely see there being some blackmail going on.

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 19 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Fucking dorks lmao

Ftr, women do this too with their menstrual cycles. Stop using apps to report your most intimate info and then being surprisepikachu.jpg when they harvest your data lol

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 33 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

"Porn addiction" is being pushed by fundamentalist christians, to force a complete total porn ban, nothing more.

Sex addiction, to some degree, is literally coded into your brain, unless you're a certain kind of asexual.

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 10 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

What would you like it to be called then when someone spends 4+ hours a day, 5+ days a week masturbating to porn, feels terrible about it, tries to quit, and then immediately caves and falls right back into the same cycle?

How do you think a person like that feels when they're hit with all these accusations the second they open up about wanting their normal life back? Reading these comments honestly makes me sick. Just fucking imagine the backlash if almost any other mental-health issue affecting tens of millions of people got ridiculed here the way porn addiction does.

I'm sure you can find recovering alcoholics who equally advocate for alcohol prohibition, but you'd have to be out of your damn mind to jump on someone the moment they mention cutting back on drinking and start accusing them of being a puritan or whatever. Yet somehow that passes for sound logic when it's about someone trying to quit porn.

[–] paultimate14@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Prior to Christian fundamentalists influencing the academic world in the last couple decades, there used to be a distinction between "addiction" and things like "compulsory behaviors" or "habits".

Alcohol has physiological withdrawal symptoms.

Calling this out is not to undermine those who have real behavioral issues, but to highlight the malicious influence of these very real and VERY well-funded groups. This isn't some conspiracy theory- there are plenty of documents from government agencies about how sexual restriction and shame is used to control people. The Islamic State pretty famously used this in their recruiting and training programs to radicalize people.

The fault lies not with porn, but with societal repression of sexuality. There will always be people who have behavioral issues- most of which are not sexually related. And any well-functioning society should have the resources available to help those people.

Here's a person "addicted" to eating drywall. Should we pass laws mandating age verification for purchasing construction materials now? Should we make a bunch of apps with sketchy security to help people track their drywall eating habits?

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Nobody here is advocating for banning porn or even restricting anyone's access to it. I've never met a single person struggling with what I call porn addiction - whether it clinically qualifies as addiction or not - who wants to restrict other people's access to it.

There doesn't need to be any ideology attached to one's personal desire to quit or cut back on their porn consumption.

[–] paultimate14@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

That is always where the argument goes. That is what the Christian Fundamentalists that u/ZILtoid1991 was referring to are calling for. It starts with claiming that this is some huge problem plaguing whatever country they are in, and inevitably leads down the road of invading privacy and authoritarian control.

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk -1 points 2 hours ago

Are you seriously not able to acknowledge that some people simply want to fix their own lives and don't care what others do with theirs? Does everyone talking about their porn addiction have a secret agenda? Is that really what you think?

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 11 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] one_old_coder@piefed.social 19 points 10 hours ago (6 children)

Same. The nofap thing always felt wrong to me. You cannot claim publicly that you don't masturbate unless there is some kind of "god will be happy if I behave well according to the bible or some other shit."

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

US has always been weird about sex. If it weren't for alcohol, it would never happen.

look it up, corn flakes and Graham crackers were both designed to prevent masturbation.

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

I think they're pretty effective. Have you ever tried to masturbate with corn flakes and graham crackers? It's rough.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›